Hello,
Quoting on the subject, I had gone through a review article for Gnome 2.14 and I began wondering if FC5 release notes should mention a reviewed hardware requirement for GNOME 2.14 based desktop installations, as per the facts delivered in this review article ( http://www.linux.com/article.pl?sid=06/03/17/0350228 ).
"Still, even allowing for my unscientific timing, the increase in speed is impressive. It should be especially welcome on older, RAM-challenged machines."
For some reasons I am not using rawhide as of now, so some one else would be in a better position to suggest and test further, Rahul ?
I will also like to mention couple of facts that member developers of FC team from developed countries could learn during Linux Asia 06, (since those are not qouted much anywhere else) that in developing nations, power disruptions affected and low on resources machines .... --> expect Linux installations self recoverable, --> expects software suspend an important feature, --> expects lower hardware requirements.
Rahul, Chris, Greg ?
Thanks & Cheers, Kevin
Kevin Verma wrote:
Hello,
Quoting on the subject, I had gone through a review article for Gnome 2.14 and I began wondering if FC5 release notes should mention a reviewed hardware requirement for GNOME 2.14 based desktop installations, as per the facts delivered in this review article ( http://www.linux.com/article.pl?sid=06/03/17/0350228 ).
"Still, even allowing for my unscientific timing, the increase in speed is impressive. It should be especially welcome on older, RAM-challenged machines."
For some reasons I am not using rawhide as of now, so some one else would be in a better position to suggest and test further, Rahul ?
The requirements specified in the release notes can be still considered reasonable. I have been running it with reasonable performance on lower end systems though.
I will also like to mention couple of facts that member developers of FC team from developed countries could learn during Linux Asia 06, (since those are not qouted much anywhere else) that in developing nations, power disruptions affected and low on resources machines .... --> expect Linux installations self recoverable,
Should happen at some point. check out rescue mode automation at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/AnacondaWorkItems.
--> expects software suspend an important feature,
There has been some integration work done earlier. It should work on many systems for Fedora Core 5. If it doesnt, kindly file bug reports with the hardware details.
--> expects lower hardware requirements.
The work that has been happening on the OLPC front - http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/OLPC should help clean up dependencies and yield some performance benefits for low end systems.
Rahul, Chris, Greg ?
Thanks & Cheers, Kevin
The work that has been happening on the OLPC front - http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/OLPC should help clean up dependencies and yield some performance benefits for low end systems.
Going off-topic, but I think that the olpc related softs should be in extras...
-- Pat
Patrice Dumas wrote:
The work that has been happening on the OLPC front - http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/OLPC should help clean up dependencies and yield some performance benefits for low end systems.
Going off-topic, but I think that the olpc related softs should be in extras...
Most of the base operating system modifications would just be integrated into rawhide itself. For the rest, there is a plan to setup a repository for OLPC already. The above wiki page has several details, for participating and keep track of the discussions.
On 3/18/06, Kevin Verma kevinverma@gmail.com wrote:
I will also like to mention couple of facts that member developers of FC team from developed countries could learn during Linux Asia 06, (since those are not qouted much anywhere else) that in developing nations, power disruptions affected and low on resources machines .... --> expect Linux installations self recoverable, --> expects software suspend an important feature, --> expects lower hardware requirements.
<remark>
I am not sure that using the terms developed and developing countries in the context of Fedora is very healthy even if the mentioned requirements are valid. Those are just requirements of _people_ or certain interest groups and that is a proper distinction in contrast with economical, geographical, racial...
Bela
I've just been reading the final release notes of FC5 and the hardware requirements seems reasonable enough, cheers folks.
Bela,
I am not sure that using the terms developed and developing countries in the context of Fedora is very healthy even if the mentioned requirements are valid. Those are just requirements of _people_ or certain interest groups and that is a proper distinction in contrast with economical, geographical, racial...
You have a valid point that I guess I'll try to take care about but if you can please kindly keep the racism out of our decent community, cheers
Oh by the way if some one can please hit me with light, for what did serial mouse did wrong ?
On 3/21/06, Kevin Verma kevinverma@gmail.com wrote:
I've just been reading the final release notes of FC5 and the hardware requirements seems reasonable enough, cheers folks.
Bela,
I am not sure that using the terms developed and developing countries in the context of Fedora is very healthy even if the mentioned requirements are valid. Those are just requirements of _people_ or certain interest groups and that is a proper distinction in contrast with economical, geographical, racial...
You have a valid point that I guess I'll try to take care about but if you can please kindly keep the racism out of our decent community, cheers
devel@lists.stg.fedoraproject.org