I would prefer irssi over epic, having made the switch a while ago, its been stable and very intuitive.

On Tue, 18 Jan 2005 12:35:29 +0800, Colin Charles byte@aeon.com.my wrote:

Hi,

For FC-4, what would folk think about removing epic and replacing it with irssi in Core?

irssi currently sits in Extras, and we could very likely just move epic to Extras after the swap.

Thoughts?

Colin Charles, byte@aeon.com.my http://www.bytebot.net/ "First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win." -- Mohandas Gandhi

-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

Am Di, den 18.01.2005 schrieb Colin Charles um 5:35:

For FC-4, what would folk think about removing epic and replacing it with irssi in Core?

irssi currently sits in Extras, and we could very likely just move epic to Extras after the swap.

Thoughts?

Colin Charles, byte@aeon.com.my

Hi Colin,

I think this is a good idea as there are certainly much more irssi users than epic fans. irssi is actively developed and has powerful features like the proxy ability.

Alexander