2012/2/21 Jon Ciesla limburgher@gmail.com:
2012/2/21 Michał Piotrowski mkkp4x4@gmail.com:
Hi,
Is there a chance to get httpd 2.4 in Fedora 17 http://www.apache.org/dist/httpd/Announcement2.4.html ?
This is the first major release from a few years and has some nice features.
Not likely this late in the cycle, though the timing is great for f18.
How about SPDY support? http://code.google.com/p/mod-spdy/
Firefox supports SPDY http://hacks.mozilla.org/2012/02/spdy-brings-responsive-and-scalable-transpo...
If there are any "work in progress" packages for mod_spdy I would like to help test them :)
-J
-- Best regards, Michal
http://eventhorizon.pl/
devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
-- in your fear, seek only peace in your fear, seek only love
-d. bowie
devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
W dniu 13 marca 2012 21:59 użytkownik Michał Piotrowski mkkp4x4@gmail.com napisał:
2012/2/21 Jon Ciesla limburgher@gmail.com:
2012/2/21 Michał Piotrowski mkkp4x4@gmail.com:
Hi,
Is there a chance to get httpd 2.4 in Fedora 17 http://www.apache.org/dist/httpd/Announcement2.4.html ?
This is the first major release from a few years and has some nice features.
Not likely this late in the cycle, though the timing is great for f18.
How about SPDY support? http://code.google.com/p/mod-spdy/
Firefox supports SPDY http://hacks.mozilla.org/2012/02/spdy-brings-responsive-and-scalable-transpo...
If there are any "work in progress" packages for mod_spdy I would like to help test them :)
From now Jetty server also supports SPDY
http://webtide.intalio.com/2012/03/spdy-support-in-jetty/
2012/3/13 Michał Piotrowski mkkp4x4@gmail.com:
2012/2/21 Jon Ciesla limburgher@gmail.com:
2012/2/21 Michał Piotrowski mkkp4x4@gmail.com:
Hi,
Is there a chance to get httpd 2.4 in Fedora 17 http://www.apache.org/dist/httpd/Announcement2.4.html ?
This is the first major release from a few years and has some nice features.
Not likely this late in the cycle, though the timing is great for f18.
How about SPDY support? http://code.google.com/p/mod-spdy/
Firefox supports SPDY http://hacks.mozilla.org/2012/02/spdy-brings-responsive-and-scalable-transpo...
If there are any "work in progress" packages for mod_spdy I would like to help test them :)
There's nothing stopping you from packaging up mod_spdy or any other modules that add support for the protocol.
Peter
2012/3/21 Peter Robinson pbrobinson@gmail.com:
2012/3/13 Michał Piotrowski mkkp4x4@gmail.com:
2012/2/21 Jon Ciesla limburgher@gmail.com:
2012/2/21 Michał Piotrowski mkkp4x4@gmail.com:
Hi,
Is there a chance to get httpd 2.4 in Fedora 17 http://www.apache.org/dist/httpd/Announcement2.4.html ?
This is the first major release from a few years and has some nice features.
Not likely this late in the cycle, though the timing is great for f18.
How about SPDY support? http://code.google.com/p/mod-spdy/
Firefox supports SPDY http://hacks.mozilla.org/2012/02/spdy-brings-responsive-and-scalable-transpo...
If there are any "work in progress" packages for mod_spdy I would like to help test them :)
There's nothing stopping you from packaging up mod_spdy or any other modules that add support for the protocol.
I will try tomorrow - I've got mod_fcgid package sources for reference.
Who can mod_spdy if I make the spec file for this?
Peter
devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
W dniu 21 marca 2012 15:13 użytkownik Michał Piotrowski mkkp4x4@gmail.com napisał:
2012/3/21 Peter Robinson pbrobinson@gmail.com:
[..]
There's nothing stopping you from packaging up mod_spdy or any other modules that add support for the protocol.
I will try tomorrow - I've got mod_fcgid package sources for reference.
Who can mod_spdy if I make the spec file for this?
I wanted to write "Who can adopt mod_spdy" :)
I created a feature page https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/F18SPDY
If someone accidentally did not know what SPDY is - there is a link to interesting video from GoogleTechTalks on this page.
I also created an initial version of spec file for mod_spdy that can be found at this repo https://github.com/eventhorizonpl/mod_spdy
On 03/27/2012 09:46 PM, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
W dniu 21 marca 2012 15:13 użytkownik Michał Piotrowski mkkp4x4@gmail.com napisał:
2012/3/21 Peter Robinson pbrobinson@gmail.com:
[..]
There's nothing stopping you from packaging up mod_spdy or any other modules that add support for the protocol.
I will try tomorrow - I've got mod_fcgid package sources for reference.
Who can mod_spdy if I make the spec file for this?
I wanted to write "Who can adopt mod_spdy" :)
I created a feature page https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/F18SPDY
If someone accidentally did not know what SPDY is - there is a link to interesting video from GoogleTechTalks on this page.
I also created an initial version of spec file for mod_spdy that can be found at this repo https://github.com/eventhorizonpl/mod_spdy
That mod_ssl_with_npn.so hack looks pretty dodgy to me. Does that even work? Have you tested this together with the regular mod_ssl that comes with the httpd package? I cannot see how both modules can coexist.
Regards, Dennis
Hi,
2012/3/28 Dennis Jacobfeuerborn dennisml@conversis.de:
On 03/27/2012 09:46 PM, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
W dniu 21 marca 2012 15:13 użytkownik Michał Piotrowski mkkp4x4@gmail.com napisał:
2012/3/21 Peter Robinson pbrobinson@gmail.com:
[..]
There's nothing stopping you from packaging up mod_spdy or any other modules that add support for the protocol.
I will try tomorrow - I've got mod_fcgid package sources for reference.
Who can mod_spdy if I make the spec file for this?
I wanted to write "Who can adopt mod_spdy" :)
I created a feature page https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/F18SPDY
If someone accidentally did not know what SPDY is - there is a link to interesting video from GoogleTechTalks on this page.
I also created an initial version of spec file for mod_spdy that can be found at this repo https://github.com/eventhorizonpl/mod_spdy
That mod_ssl_with_npn.so hack looks pretty dodgy to me. Does that even work? Have you tested this together with the regular mod_ssl that comes with the httpd package?
I've got some problems with getting it to work.
I cannot see how both modules can coexist.
I think that it is not possible.
Regards, Dennis -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 03/28/2012 07:39 PM, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
Hi,
2012/3/28 Dennis Jacobfeuerborn dennisml@conversis.de:
On 03/27/2012 09:46 PM, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
W dniu 21 marca 2012 15:13 użytkownik Michał Piotrowski mkkp4x4@gmail.com napisał:
2012/3/21 Peter Robinson pbrobinson@gmail.com:
[..]
There's nothing stopping you from packaging up mod_spdy or any other modules that add support for the protocol.
I will try tomorrow - I've got mod_fcgid package sources for reference.
Who can mod_spdy if I make the spec file for this?
I wanted to write "Who can adopt mod_spdy" :)
I created a feature page https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/F18SPDY
If someone accidentally did not know what SPDY is - there is a link to interesting video from GoogleTechTalks on this page.
I also created an initial version of spec file for mod_spdy that can be found at this repo https://github.com/eventhorizonpl/mod_spdy
That mod_ssl_with_npn.so hack looks pretty dodgy to me. Does that even work? Have you tested this together with the regular mod_ssl that comes with the httpd package?
I've got some problems with getting it to work.
I cannot see how both modules can coexist.
I think that it is not possible.
As far as I can tell the patch required to mod_ssl is fairly simple and it looks like it will be committed to upstream soon: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52210
You could ask the maintainer of the httpd package what he thinks about adding this patch to the package so the modified mod_ssl is no longer required.
Regards, Dennis
Hi,
2012/3/29 Dennis Jacobfeuerborn dennisml@conversis.de:
On 03/28/2012 07:39 PM, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
Hi,
2012/3/28 Dennis Jacobfeuerborn dennisml@conversis.de:
On 03/27/2012 09:46 PM, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
W dniu 21 marca 2012 15:13 użytkownik Michał Piotrowski mkkp4x4@gmail.com napisał:
2012/3/21 Peter Robinson pbrobinson@gmail.com:
[..]
There's nothing stopping you from packaging up mod_spdy or any other modules that add support for the protocol.
I will try tomorrow - I've got mod_fcgid package sources for reference.
Who can mod_spdy if I make the spec file for this?
I wanted to write "Who can adopt mod_spdy" :)
I created a feature page https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/F18SPDY
If someone accidentally did not know what SPDY is - there is a link to interesting video from GoogleTechTalks on this page.
I also created an initial version of spec file for mod_spdy that can be found at this repo https://github.com/eventhorizonpl/mod_spdy
That mod_ssl_with_npn.so hack looks pretty dodgy to me. Does that even work? Have you tested this together with the regular mod_ssl that comes with the httpd package?
I've got some problems with getting it to work.
I cannot see how both modules can coexist.
I think that it is not possible.
As far as I can tell the patch required to mod_ssl is fairly simple and it looks like it will be committed to upstream soon: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52210
You could ask the maintainer of the httpd package what he thinks about adding this patch to the package so the modified mod_ssl is no longer required.
I asked for inclusion of this patch https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=809599
I hope the request will be positively considered :)
Regards, Dennis -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Hi,
W dniu 28 marca 2012 19:39 użytkownik Michał Piotrowski mkkp4x4@gmail.com napisał:
Hi,
2012/3/28 Dennis Jacobfeuerborn dennisml@conversis.de:
On 03/27/2012 09:46 PM, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
W dniu 21 marca 2012 15:13 użytkownik Michał Piotrowski mkkp4x4@gmail.com napisał:
2012/3/21 Peter Robinson pbrobinson@gmail.com:
[..]
There's nothing stopping you from packaging up mod_spdy or any other modules that add support for the protocol.
I will try tomorrow - I've got mod_fcgid package sources for reference.
Who can mod_spdy if I make the spec file for this?
I wanted to write "Who can adopt mod_spdy" :)
I created a feature page https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/F18SPDY
If someone accidentally did not know what SPDY is - there is a link to interesting video from GoogleTechTalks on this page.
I also created an initial version of spec file for mod_spdy that can be found at this repo https://github.com/eventhorizonpl/mod_spdy
That mod_ssl_with_npn.so hack looks pretty dodgy to me. Does that even work? Have you tested this together with the regular mod_ssl that comes with the httpd package?
I've got some problems with getting it to work.
I am pleased to announce that Fedora has working mod_spdy :)
https://github.com/eventhorizonpl/mod_spdy
devel@lists.stg.fedoraproject.org