For F18, it appears that the Audacity mp3 build is broken - it won't install - and mp3 support is rather important to me; is it possible to get this particular build working?
On Sun, 28 Apr 2013 07:09:30 -0700 Richard Vickery richard.vickeryrv@gmail.com wrote:
For F18, it appears that the Audacity mp3 build is broken - it won't install - and mp3 support is rather important to me; is it possible to get this particular build working?
Important or otherwise, Fedora don't build in mp3 support ootb You need to travel another road.
On Apr 28, 2013 7:21 AM, "Frank Murphy" frankly3d@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, 28 Apr 2013 07:09:30 -0700 Richard Vickery richard.vickeryrv@gmail.com wrote:
For F18, it appears that the Audacity mp3 build is broken - it won't install - and mp3 support is rather important to me; is it possible to get this particular build working?
Important or otherwise, Fedora don't build in mp3 support ootb You need to travel another road.
-- Regards, Frank www.frankly3d.com --
Thanks Frank,
I thought we did, acknowledging that we are a loose group of developers throughout the globe. Is there a bit of code that I could possibly write in? or Should I just go bother them?
Thanks again, Richard
Am 28.04.2013 16:50, schrieb Richard Vickery:
On Apr 28, 2013 7:21 AM, "Frank Murphy" <frankly3d@gmail.com mailto:frankly3d@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sun, 28 Apr 2013 07:09:30 -0700 Richard Vickery <richard.vickeryrv@gmail.com mailto:richard.vickeryrv@gmail.com> wrote:
For F18, it appears that the Audacity mp3 build is broken - it won't install - and mp3 support is rather important to me; is it possible to get this particular build working?
Important or otherwise, Fedora don't build in mp3 support ootb You need to travel another road.
I thought we did, acknowledging that we are a loose group of developers throughout the globe. Is there a bit of code that I could possibly write in? or Should I just go bother them?
besides the fact that it is pretty clear that MP3 is not supported by a US distribution and this belongs to the users-list you find such packages always in the rpmfusion-repos
[harry@srv-rhsoft:~]$ rpm -qa | grep audacity audacity-freeworld-2.0.0-1.fc18.x86_64
On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 9:09 AM, Richard Vickery < richard.vickeryrv@gmail.com> wrote:
For F18, it appears that the Audacity mp3 build is broken - it won't install - and mp3 support is rather important to me; is it possible to get this particular build working?
I think what you're looking for is the audacity-freeworld add-on package from RPM Fusion, probably best to inquire there, although I think it was on the FTBFS list for F19, but you may be OK for F18.
Richard
Please report that to RPMFusion. Not here. As have said before, Fedora does not support mp3 files because is not free and some countries could be prohibed by law.
Please contact with RPMfusion people.
Greetings! El 28/04/2013 16:28, "Richard Shaw" hobbes1069@gmail.com escribió:
On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 9:09 AM, Richard Vickery < richard.vickeryrv@gmail.com> wrote:
For F18, it appears that the Audacity mp3 build is broken - it won't install - and mp3 support is rather important to me; is it possible to get this particular build working?
I think what you're looking for is the audacity-freeworld add-on package from RPM Fusion, probably best to inquire there, although I think it was on the FTBFS list for F19, but you may be OK for F18.
Richard
-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Dom, 2013-04-28 at 10:28 -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 9:09 AM, Richard Vickery richard.vickeryrv@gmail.com wrote: For F18, it appears that the Audacity mp3 build is broken - it won't install - and mp3 support is rather important to me; is it possible to get this particular build working?
I think what you're looking for is the audacity-freeworld add-on package from RPM Fusion, probably best to inquire there, although I think it was on the FTBFS list for F19, but you may be OK for F18.
it is also FTBFS on F18 , but compiles if we use --without-ffmpeg like I wrote I'd like continue in rpmfusion Maling List ...
please
Thanks
On Tue, 30 Apr 2013 22:35:12 +0100 Sérgio Basto sergio@serjux.com wrote:
On Dom, 2013-04-28 at 10:28 -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 9:09 AM, Richard Vickery richard.vickeryrv@gmail.com wrote: For F18, it appears that the Audacity mp3 build is broken - it won't install - and mp3 support is rather important to me; is it possible to get this particular build working?
I think what you're looking for is the audacity-freeworld add-on package from RPM Fusion, probably best to inquire there, although I think it was on the FTBFS list for F19, but you may be OK for F18.
it is also FTBFS on F18 , but compiles if we use --without-ffmpeg like I wrote I'd like continue in rpmfusion Maling List ...
Hello, Everyone I had been having a similar problem building Audacity on Fedora 18. Following this advice:
Audacity does not yet support building against later than FFmpeg 0.7 or 0.8.
So if the system FFmpeg is 1.0.5 you will need to self-compile FFmpeg 0.7 or 0.8 then link Audacity against that.
I have been able to successfully build Audacity from SVN on Fedora 18 WITH mp3 support.
Here is the entire email I received from the Audacity mailing list:
From: gale@audacityteam.org To: Discussion list for Audacity users audacity-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Audacity-users] Can't build Audacity from SVN on Fedora 18 Date: Mon, 01 Apr 2013 00:12:18 +0100 Reply-To: audacity-users@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.64.06 [en] (Unregistered)
Hi Steven,
Audacity does not yet support building against later than FFmpeg 0.7 or 0.8.
So if the system FFmpeg is 1.0.5 you will need to self-compile FFmpeg 0.7 or 0.8 then link Audacity against that.
Alternatively I think if you configure Audacity --without-ffmpeg to enable it to build you should still be able to export to FFmpeg formats using the Audacity command-line exporter.
To do this, choose "(external program)" when you export then point Audacity to the appropriate .so file: http://manual.audacityteam.org/o/man/exporting_to_an_external_program.html .
Command-line export supports any version of FFmpeg.
Gale
On Ter, 2013-04-30 at 18:18 -0500, Steven P. Ulrick wrote:
On Tue, 30 Apr 2013 22:35:12 +0100 Sérgio Basto sergio@serjux.com wrote:
On Dom, 2013-04-28 at 10:28 -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 9:09 AM, Richard Vickery richard.vickeryrv@gmail.com wrote: For F18, it appears that the Audacity mp3 build is broken - it won't install - and mp3 support is rather important to me; is it possible to get this particular build working?
I think what you're looking for is the audacity-freeworld add-on package from RPM Fusion, probably best to inquire there, although I think it was on the FTBFS list for F19, but you may be OK for F18.
it is also FTBFS on F18 , but compiles if we use --without-ffmpeg like I wrote I'd like continue in rpmfusion Maling List ...
Hello, Everyone I had been having a similar problem building Audacity on Fedora 18.
Solutions here https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2707
On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 10:09 AM, Richard Vickery < richard.vickeryrv@gmail.com> wrote:
For F18, it appears that the Audacity mp3 build is broken - it won't install - and mp3 support is rather important to me; is it possible to get this particular build working?
MP3 players, and the DVD library libdvdcss, represent legal problems for US developers. MP3 is patented, and there are *no* licenses available for Linux environments. libdvdcss runs into the protection of digital rights software in the DMCA, and has even nastier legal protections on it for US developers.
The result is that there are worldwide software repositories such as rpmfusion for MP3, MP4, and a lot of other really useful software, and freshrpms for the libdvdcss that are publicly available. *BUT* you need it to be legal in the country you're downloading *to* to be able to use them without threat of prosecution. There's also the Penguin Liberation Front for a few components with weird licensing that others haven't been able to resolve usable licenses for.
In order to use MP3 legally, I'm assuming you're in a country without that bane of development everywhere, software patents, and can legally use http://rpmfusion.org/. If so, enjoy!!!!
Le dimanche 28 avril 2013 à 13:08 -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia a écrit :
There's also the Penguin Liberation Front for a few components with weird licensing that others haven't been able to resolve usable licenses for.
PLF closed a few weeks ago[1], and was for Mandriva.
[1] http://www.mail-archive.com/plf-discuss@zarb.org/msg01913.html
On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 7:08 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia nkadel@gmail.com wrote:
MP3 is patented, and there are *no* licenses available for Linux environments.
This is nonsense. There are enough "licenses for the linux environment". A lot of vendors have licensed MP3 en/decoders that work on the linux. The point is that there is no licensed open source mp3 en/decoder.
On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 2:23 PM, drago01 drago01@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 7:08 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia nkadel@gmail.com wrote:
MP3 is patented, and there are *no* licenses available for Linux environments.
This is nonsense. There are enough "licenses for the linux environment". A lot of vendors have licensed MP3 en/decoders that work on the linux. The point is that there is no licensed open source mp3 en/decoder.
Name 2.
On Mon, 29 Apr 2013 17:20:30 -0400 Nico Kadel-Garcia nkadel@gmail.com wrote:
This is nonsense. There are enough "licenses for the linux environment". A lot of vendors have licensed MP3 en/decoders that work on the linux. The point is that there is no licensed open source mp3 en/decoder.
Name 2.
http://www.fluendo.com/shop/product/fluendo-mp3-decoder/ http://www.nero.com/enu/downloads-linux4-update.php
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 5:37 PM, Frank Murphy frankly3d@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, 29 Apr 2013 17:20:30 -0400 Nico Kadel-Garcia nkadel@gmail.com wrote:
This is nonsense. There are enough "licenses for the linux environment". A lot of vendors have licensed MP3 en/decoders that work on the linux. The point is that there is no licensed open source mp3 en/decoder.
Name 2.
http://www.fluendo.com/shop/product/fluendo-mp3-decoder/ http://www.nero.com/enu/downloads-linux4-update.php
Neither of which address the existing MP3 patent issues, only software copyright issues. Mind you, Most of these patents are finally expiring, and the existing court cases have been.... oddm and usually settled out of court. But there's nothing in those licenses that protects you from the existing patent claims of Alcatel-Lucent, or of Texas MP3 Technologies, or those of a Japanese electronics firm I used to work for. (Ask privately if curious.)
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 4:55 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia nkadel@gmail.com wrote:
Neither of which address the existing MP3 patent issues, only software copyright issues. Mind you, Most of these patents are finally expiring, and the existing court cases have been.... oddm and usually settled out of court. But there's nothing in those licenses that protects you from the existing patent claims of Alcatel-Lucent, or of Texas MP3 Technologies, or those of a Japanese electronics firm I used to work for. (Ask privately if curious.)
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/legal/2012-May/001904.html
"We'll revisit decoding in late 2015, barring sanity in US patent law spontaneously appearing (or the Mayan apocalypse rendering the issue irrelevant)."
Since the Mayan apocalypse did not render the issue irrelevant (and that was clearly the more plausible of the two posited scenarios), we'll have to wait until 2015.
-T.C.
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 1:55 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia nkadel@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 5:37 PM, Frank Murphy frankly3d@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, 29 Apr 2013 17:20:30 -0400 Nico Kadel-Garcia nkadel@gmail.com wrote:
This is nonsense. There are enough "licenses for the linux environment". A lot of vendors have licensed MP3 en/decoders that work on the linux. The point is that there is no licensed open source mp3 en/decoder.
Name 2.
http://www.fluendo.com/shop/product/fluendo-mp3-decoder/ http://www.nero.com/enu/downloads-linux4-update.php
Neither of which address the existing MP3 patent issues, only software copyright issues.
They do have a valid patent license (other example is Google). It isn't impossible to get a patent license for "the linux plattform". Having a redistribute able one (so that you can ship open source software) is where the problems are. Even if fedora could get a license (via red hat) it would not apply for people that redistribute it hence it would be non free.
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 2:40 AM, drago01 drago01@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 1:55 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia nkadel@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 5:37 PM, Frank Murphy frankly3d@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, 29 Apr 2013 17:20:30 -0400 Nico Kadel-Garcia nkadel@gmail.com wrote:
This is nonsense. There are enough "licenses for the linux environment". A lot of vendors have licensed MP3 en/decoders that work on the linux. The point is that there is no licensed open source mp3 en/decoder.
Name 2.
http://www.fluendo.com/shop/product/fluendo-mp3-decoder/ http://www.nero.com/enu/downloads-linux4-update.php
Neither of which address the existing MP3 patent issues, only software copyright issues.
They do have a valid patent license (other example is Google). It
Which "they"? The fluendo licensing, from reviewing their printed license, refers to MIT software licenses. The MIT softwae licenses do not cover patents held by 3rd parties.
Nero licensing is another story, I'll admit. The restrictions on MPEG-2 and MPEG-4 use, declared at http://www.nero.com/enu/end-user-agreement.html, are fascinating: I assume that Nero has made a vaguely successful commercial agreeement for the licenses. But that's the first remotely valid license I've seen for Linux use of MPEG under USA patent reestrictions.
isn't impossible to get a patent license for "the linux plattform". Having a redistribute able one (so that you can ship open source software) is where the problems are. Even if fedora could get a license (via red hat) it would not apply for people that redistribute it hence it would be non free.
And would not be "open", either.
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 03:47:55PM -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 2:40 AM, drago01 drago01@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 1:55 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia nkadel@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 5:37 PM, Frank Murphy frankly3d@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, 29 Apr 2013 17:20:30 -0400 Nico Kadel-Garcia nkadel@gmail.com wrote:
This is nonsense. There are enough "licenses for the linux environment". A lot of vendors have licensed MP3 en/decoders that work on the linux. The point is that there is no licensed open source mp3 en/decoder.
Name 2.
http://www.fluendo.com/shop/product/fluendo-mp3-decoder/ http://www.nero.com/enu/downloads-linux4-update.php
Neither of which address the existing MP3 patent issues, only software copyright issues.
They do have a valid patent license (other example is Google). It
Which "they"? The fluendo licensing, from reviewing their printed license, refers to MIT software licenses. The MIT softwae licenses do not cover patents held by 3rd parties.
Did you even read linked page? Especially paragraphs with "MP3 and patents" and "The fully licensed binary GStreamer plug-in" headings?
New packages for soxr have been requested for updates-testing for 18 and 19.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=958132
That should help Hans if he chooses to update audacity to the latest version.
Thanks, Richard
Hi,
On 04/30/2013 10:27 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
New packages for soxr have been requested for updates-testing for 18 and 19.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=958132
That should help Hans if he chooses to update audacity to the latest version.
Thanks!
Regards,
Hans
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 4:23 PM, Tomasz Torcz tomek@pipebreaker.pl wrote:
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 03:47:55PM -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 2:40 AM, drago01 drago01@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 1:55 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia nkadel@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 5:37 PM, Frank Murphy frankly3d@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, 29 Apr 2013 17:20:30 -0400 Nico Kadel-Garcia nkadel@gmail.com wrote:
> This is nonsense. There are enough "licenses for the linux > environment". A lot of vendors have licensed MP3 en/decoders that > work on the linux. The point is that there is no licensed open > source mp3 en/decoder.
Name 2.
http://www.fluendo.com/shop/product/fluendo-mp3-decoder/ http://www.nero.com/enu/downloads-linux4-update.php
Neither of which address the existing MP3 patent issues, only software copyright issues.
They do have a valid patent license (other example is Google). It
Which "they"? The fluendo licensing, from reviewing their printed license, refers to MIT software licenses. The MIT softwae licenses do not cover patents held by 3rd parties.
Did you even read linked page? Especially paragraphs with "MP3 and patents" and "The fully licensed binary GStreamer plug-in" headings?
Reading it in even more in detail, I can only say "ick". They can't publish source for it, only binaries for countries with softwae patents. The MP3 license is quite orthogonal to the MIT licensing they speak of..
OK, you've managed to get *one* working license, but it's binary only, not a valid source license in countries with valid patents. That's a big improvement over a few years ago, I'll concede.
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 9:47 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia nkadel@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 2:40 AM, drago01 drago01@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 1:55 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia nkadel@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 5:37 PM, Frank Murphy frankly3d@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, 29 Apr 2013 17:20:30 -0400 Nico Kadel-Garcia nkadel@gmail.com wrote:
This is nonsense. There are enough "licenses for the linux environment". A lot of vendors have licensed MP3 en/decoders that work on the linux. The point is that there is no licensed open source mp3 en/decoder.
Name 2.
http://www.fluendo.com/shop/product/fluendo-mp3-decoder/ http://www.nero.com/enu/downloads-linux4-update.php
Neither of which address the existing MP3 patent issues, only software copyright issues.
They do have a valid patent license (other example is Google). It
Which "they"?
Fluendo S.A i.e the company.
The fluendo licensing, from reviewing their printed license, refers to MIT software licenses. The MIT softwae licenses do not cover patents held by 3rd parties.
You are mixing copyright and patent law. If you download the code and compile it you don't have a license. The binaries shipped by fluendo are proper licensed though.
Nero licensing is another story, I'll admit. The restrictions on MPEG-2 and MPEG-4 use, declared at http://www.nero.com/enu/end-user-agreement.html, are fascinating: I assume that Nero has made a vaguely successful commercial agreeement for the licenses. But that's the first remotely valid license I've seen for Linux use of MPEG under USA patent reestrictions.
Google Chrome? Adobe Flash? Android ? ....
On Mon, 2013-04-29 at 19:55 -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 5:37 PM, Frank Murphy frankly3d@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, 29 Apr 2013 17:20:30 -0400 Nico Kadel-Garcia nkadel@gmail.com wrote:
This is nonsense. There are enough "licenses for the linux environment". A lot of vendors have licensed MP3 en/decoders that work on the linux. The point is that there is no licensed open source mp3 en/decoder.
Name 2.
http://www.fluendo.com/shop/product/fluendo-mp3-decoder/ http://www.nero.com/enu/downloads-linux4-update.php
Neither of which address the existing MP3 patent issues, only software copyright issues. Mind you, Most of these patents are finally expiring, and the existing court cases have been.... oddm and usually settled out of court. But there's nothing in those licenses that protects you from the existing patent claims of Alcatel-Lucent, or of Texas MP3 Technologies, or those of a Japanese electronics firm I used to work for. (Ask privately if curious.)
One: you, drago01 and Frank are not in fact disagreeing. When drago01 wrote:
"This is nonsense. There are enough "licenses for the linux environment". A lot of vendors have licensed MP3 en/decoders that work on the linux. The point is that there is no licensed open source mp3 en/decoder."
he was saying more or less what you are. There are F/OSS MP3 decoders. There are MP3 decoders with patent licenses. But there is no F/OSS MP3 decoder with a patent license.
Fluendo's decoder is an example of a non-F/OSS decoder which has a patent license. mgp123 is an example of a F/OSS decoder which has no patent license. RPM Fusion can include either type of decoder (though I think in practice it includes only the 'F/OSS but not patent licensed' type), but Fedora can include neither.
audacity is unmaintained in both fedora and RPM Fusion. I'm about to kick it out of the later repository.
Nicolas (kwizart)
2013/4/28 Richard Vickery richard.vickeryrv@gmail.com
For F18, it appears that the Audacity mp3 build is broken - it won't install - and mp3 support is rather important to me; is it possible to get this particular build working?
-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 10:55 AM, Nicolas Chauvet kwizart@gmail.com wrote:
audacity is unmaintained in both fedora and RPM Fusion.
That's doesn't appear to be true.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/audacity
Now, if the maintainer isn't being responsive, we have other ways to deal with that.
-J
I'm about to kick it out of the later repository.
Nicolas (kwizart)
2013/4/28 Richard Vickery richard.vickeryrv@gmail.com
For F18, it appears that the Audacity mp3 build is broken - it won't install - and mp3 support is rather important to me; is it possible to get this particular build working?
-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 11:46 AM, Jon Ciesla limburgher@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 10:55 AM, Nicolas Chauvet kwizart@gmail.comwrote:
audacity is unmaintained in both fedora and RPM Fusion.
That's doesn't appear to be true.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/audacity
Now, if the maintainer isn't being responsive, we have other ways to deal with that.
If they are non-responsive I was considering volunteering to take the packages, not that I need any more, but I do occasionally use audacity.
The latest upstream version is 2.0.3 and uses a new resampling library by default, libsoxr[1], which does not appear to be in Fedora yet.
Richard
I still have it on my system and use it, what else is there to use?
Thanks,
Phillip Lynn
On Mon, 2013-04-29 at 17:55 +0200, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
audacity is unmaintained in both fedora and RPM Fusion.
I'm about to kick it out of the later repository.
Nicolas (kwizart)
2013/4/28 Richard Vickery richard.vickeryrv@gmail.com For F18, it appears that the Audacity mp3 build is broken - it won't install - and mp3 support is rather important to me; is it possible to get this particular build working?
-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
I just packaged soxr... Anyone willing to review if I submit a review request?
Thanks, Richard
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 11:39 AM, Richard Shaw hobbes1069@gmail.com wrote:
I just packaged soxr... Anyone willing to review if I submit a review request?
Since nobody else jumped up, I'll take it. I probably won't have time to review it until Wednesday, so take your time. :-)
BTW, it looks like Hans de Goede has started the unresponive maintainer process.
-T.C.
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 11:50 PM, T.C. Hollingsworth < tchollingsworth@gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 11:39 AM, Richard Shaw hobbes1069@gmail.com wrote:
I just packaged soxr... Anyone willing to review if I submit a review request?
Since nobody else jumped up, I'll take it. I probably won't have time to review it until Wednesday, so take your time. :-)
Review request: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=958132
fedora-review output: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/34775202/soxr/review.txt
Thanks, Richard
Hi,
On 04/29/2013 05:55 PM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
audacity is unmaintained in both fedora and RPM Fusion. I'm about to kick it out of the later repository.
This is not true for at least Fedora, I've pingened the maintainer (David Timms) about the 2.0.3 update in bugzilla: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=951001
And David's response was: "Been busy then awol for a month, so just getting settled back in"
I've offered David to help with taking care of the 2.0.3 update, so that should be done soon, either by him or by me.
Regards,
Hans
On Dom, 2013-04-28 at 07:09 -0700, Richard Vickery wrote:
For F18, it appears that the Audacity mp3 build is broken - it won't install - and mp3 support is rather important to me; is it possible to get this particular build working?
What do you mean with Audacity mp3 build is broken , rpmfusion build are working , I think. At least is working Installed Packages audacious.x86_64 3.3.4-2.fc18 @updates audacious-devel.x86_64 3.3.4-2.fc18 @updates audacious-libs.x86_64 3.3.4-2.fc18 @updates audacious-plugin-fc.x86_64 0.6-19.fc18 installed audacious-plugin-xmp.x86_64 3.4.0-12.fc18 installed audacious-plugins.x86_64 3.3.4-2.fc18 @updates audacious-plugins-amidi.x86_64 3.3.4-2.fc18 @updates audacious-plugins-freeworld.x86_64 3.3.4-1.fc18 @rpmfusion-free-updates-testing audacious-plugins-freeworld-aac.x86_64 3.3.4-1.fc18 @rpmfusion-free-updates-testing audacious-plugins-freeworld-ffaudio.x86_64 3.3.4-1.fc18 @rpmfusion-free-updates-testing audacious-plugins-freeworld-mms.x86_64 3.3.4-1.fc18 @rpmfusion-free-updates-testing audacious-plugins-freeworld-mp3.x86_64 3.3.4-1.fc18 @rpmfusion-free-updates-testing audacious-plugins-jack.x86_64 3.3.4-2.fc18 @updates
On 04/30/2013 03:07 AM, Sérgio Basto wrote:
On Dom, 2013-04-28 at 07:09 -0700, Richard Vickery wrote:
For F18, it appears that the Audacity mp3 build is broken - it won't install - and mp3 support is rather important to me; is it possible to get this particular build working?
What do you mean with Audacity mp3 build is broken , rpmfusion build are working , I think. At least is working Installed Packages audacious.x86_64 3.3.4-2.fc18 @updates audacious-devel.x86_64 3.3.4-2.fc18 @updates audacious-libs.x86_64 3.3.4-2.fc18 @updates audacious-plugin-fc.x86_64 0.6-19.fc18 installed audacious-plugin-xmp.x86_64 3.4.0-12.fc18 installed audacious-plugins.x86_64 3.3.4-2.fc18 @updates audacious-plugins-amidi.x86_64 3.3.4-2.fc18 @updates audacious-plugins-freeworld.x86_64 3.3.4-1.fc18 @rpmfusion-free-updates-testing audacious-plugins-freeworld-aac.x86_64 3.3.4-1.fc18 @rpmfusion-free-updates-testing audacious-plugins-freeworld-ffaudio.x86_64 3.3.4-1.fc18 @rpmfusion-free-updates-testing audacious-plugins-freeworld-mms.x86_64 3.3.4-1.fc18 @rpmfusion-free-updates-testing audacious-plugins-freeworld-mp3.x86_64 3.3.4-1.fc18 @rpmfusion-free-updates-testing audacious-plugins-jack.x86_64 3.3.4-2.fc18 @updates
Thats audacious rather than audacity
On Dom, 2013-04-28 at 07:09 -0700, Richard Vickery wrote:
For F18, it appears that the Audacity mp3 build is broken - it won't install - and mp3 support is rather important to me; is it possible to get this particular build working?
please move this question to rpmfusion Maling lists ...
devel@lists.stg.fedoraproject.org