Hello All!
I'm currently in process of automatic enlisting of all ~10K Fedora Git repos at Ohloh. Right now roughly 7% of repositories were added and overall process will be finished in a 20-30 hours (it takes me about 5-10 seconds to properly add repository, and I don't want to speedup this process - to prevent Ohloh from accidental DoS).
Just FYI.
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 06:16:52PM +0400, Peter Lemenkov wrote:
Hello All!
I'm currently in process of automatic enlisting of all ~10K Fedora Git repos at Ohloh. Right now roughly 7% of repositories were added and overall process will be finished in a 20-30 hours (it takes me about 5-10 seconds to properly add repository, and I don't want to speedup this process - to prevent Ohloh from accidental DoS).
Ohloh seems to be saying that Fedora is 55% Emacs LISP ...
http://www.ohloh.net/p/fedora-packages/analyses/latest
Rich.
On Thu, 2010-08-12 at 17:07 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 06:16:52PM +0400, Peter Lemenkov wrote:
Hello All!
I'm currently in process of automatic enlisting of all ~10K Fedora Git repos at Ohloh. Right now roughly 7% of repositories were added and overall process will be finished in a 20-30 hours (it takes me about 5-10 seconds to properly add repository, and I don't want to speedup this process - to prevent Ohloh from accidental DoS).
Ohloh seems to be saying that Fedora is 55% Emacs LISP ...
It's only analyzed four files, so far (note the Licenses chart).
I'd guess this analysis is run fairly infrequently, and it just happened to get run right after Peter started importing repos.
Hello!
2010/8/13 Garrett Holmstrom gholms@fedoraproject.org:
On 8/12/2010 9:16, Peter Lemenkov wrote:
I'm currently in process of automatic enlisting of all ~10K Fedora Git repos at Ohloh.
Do you have some way of automatically adding new packages as they are added to Fedora in the future?
Next thing in my TODO list.
Seems that Ohloh is stuck since "12 Aug 2010 09:15 UTC" https://www.ohloh.net/p/fedora-packages/analyses/latest
Maybe Fedora Packages was a bit much :-)
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 12:56, Peter Lemenkov lemenkov@gmail.com wrote:
Hello!
2010/8/13 Garrett Holmstrom gholms@fedoraproject.org:
On 8/12/2010 9:16, Peter Lemenkov wrote:
I'm currently in process of automatic enlisting of all ~10K Fedora Git repos at Ohloh.
Do you have some way of automatically adding new packages as they are added to Fedora in the future?
Next thing in my TODO list.
-- With best regards, Peter Lemenkov. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
2010/8/17 Christof Damian christof@damian.net:
Seems that Ohloh is stuck since "12 Aug 2010 09:15 UTC" https://www.ohloh.net/p/fedora-packages/analyses/latest
Maybe Fedora Packages was a bit much :-)
Yes, unfortunately. Despite of all my efforts to distribute load uniformly over a couple of days they encountered troubles while dealing with such huge number of repositories. I hope that this will be resolved soon and I'll keep an eye on this.
On 17 August 2010 10:38, Peter Lemenkov lemenkov@gmail.com wrote:
2010/8/17 Christof Damian christof@damian.net:
Seems that Ohloh is stuck since "12 Aug 2010 09:15 UTC" https://www.ohloh.net/p/fedora-packages/analyses/latest
Maybe Fedora Packages was a bit much :-)
Yes, unfortunately. Despite of all my efforts to distribute load uniformly over a couple of days they encountered troubles while dealing with such huge number of repositories. I hope that this will be resolved soon and I'll keep an eye on this.
-- With best regards, Peter Lemenkov. --
Sorry for the threadcromancy, but I just checked my Ohloh profile today and it hasn't registered any of my commits since we switched from CVS to Git. Is Ohloh still crushed under the weight of our mighty distro?
Regards, Mat
Hello!
2010/12/14 Mat Booth fedora@matbooth.co.uk:
Sorry for the threadcromancy, but I just checked my Ohloh profile today and it hasn't registered any of my commits since we switched from CVS to Git. Is Ohloh still crushed under the weight of our mighty distro?
Yes, it still suffers from its architectural shortcomings. This is a known issue, and new Ohloh team is working on it. Unfortunately it seems that they have a lot of other (more urgent) tasks, so I wouldn't expect resolution of this problem in the nearest future.
Hello All!
2010/12/14 Peter Lemenkov lemenkov@gmail.com:
Hello!
2010/12/14 Mat Booth fedora@matbooth.co.uk:
Sorry for the threadcromancy, but I just checked my Ohloh profile today and it hasn't registered any of my commits since we switched from CVS to Git. Is Ohloh still crushed under the weight of our mighty distro?
Yes, it still suffers from its architectural shortcomings. This is a known issue, and new Ohloh team is working on it. Unfortunately it seems that they have a lot of other (more urgent) tasks, so I wouldn't expect resolution of this problem in the nearest future.
Folks from Ohloh manually recalculated Fedora statistics finally!
http://www.ohloh.net/p/fedora-packages
Hope they will overcome/fix all the shortcomings of previous Ohloh's codebase soon. Now go and claim for your contribution (note that all previous contributions stats were reset after CVS -> GIT transition):
http://www.ohloh.net/p/fedora-packages/contributors
devel@lists.stg.fedoraproject.org
-
Adam Williamson -
Christof Damian -
Garrett Holmstrom -
Mat Booth -
Peter Lemenkov -
Richard W.M. Jones