Hi
> Read the copyright page on the RHEL manuals:
>
> "Distribution of substantively modified versions of
> this document is
> prohibited without the explicit permission of the
> copyright holder."
yes. I read through the archives and see that this is
a dead end. Apologies for bringing this up yet again
Regards
Rahul Sundaram
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new resources site!
http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/resources/
How can i install mod_python in VPS server fedora ??
--
José Hernández
h2jose(a)gmail.com
---------------------------------------------------------
User Linux: #372916.
...and God Said: "Linux Created... I'm Happy"
Omnia sunt communia !
--- Elliot Lee <sopwith(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm just learning about this corner of the Fedora
> world. :-) I'm wondering
> what you Fedora documenters have been working on,
> who's involved, what the
> frustrations are, and what plans you'd like to turn
> into reality. I did
> notice Stuart's work on the Fedora Install Guide -
> very cool - and no
> doubt there is a lot of other work that needs
> recognition and integration.
>
> Thanks for your efforts - how can I help with them?
> -- Elliot
>
Rewriting documents in GNU FDL while there already is
relevant docs in RHEL seems to be redundant work.
anyway you could help avoid that?
Regards
Rahul Sundaram
__________________________________
Celebrate Yahoo!'s 10th Birthday!
Yahoo! Netrospective: 100 Moments of the Web
http://birthday.yahoo.com/netrospective/
Hi
> It may be that Fedora docs do not need to be under
> the FDL. It would be
> interesting to know where this policy is laid out,
> and the reasoning
> behind it.
>
> -- Elliot
Here is the policy
http://fedora.redhat.com/participate/documentation-guide/s1-tutorial-licens…
I dont know the reasoning behind this thou
Regards
Rahul Sundaram
__________________________________
Celebrate Yahoo!'s 10th Birthday!
Yahoo! Netrospective: 100 Moments of the Web
http://birthday.yahoo.com/netrospective/