docs May 2011

docs@lists.stg.fedoraproject.org

24 participants
33 discussions

[Bug 693536] New: How to increase the number of configured loop devices
by Red Hat Bugzilla 31 Aug '17

31 Aug '17

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: How to increase the number of configured loop devices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=693536 Summary: How to increase the number of configured loop devices Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Platform: Unspecified OS/Version: Unspecified Status: NEW Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Component: virtualization-guide AssignedTo: fedora-docs-list(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: apevec(a)redhat.com QAContact: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org CC: stickster(a)gmail.com, kwade(a)redhat.com, oglesbyzm(a)gmail.com Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Description of problem: http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/13/html/Virtualization_Guide/sec… Number of loop devices cannot be changed via modprobe.conf since loop is not a kernel module anymore: # grep DEV_LOOP /boot/config-2.6.34.8-68.fc13.x86_64 CONFIG_BLK_DEV_LOOP=y -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.

2 7

[Bug 627417] New: docs.fp.o landing page needs 'Start here' note!
by Red Hat Bugzilla 22 Jan '15

22 Jan '15

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: docs.fp.o landing page needs 'Start here' note! https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=627417 Summary: docs.fp.o landing page needs 'Start here' note! Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: docs-requests AssignedTo: eric(a)christensenplace.us ReportedBy: nathan.thomas(a)peacenik.co.uk QAContact: fedora-docs-list(a)redhat.com CC: stickster(a)gmail.com, kwade(a)redhat.com, nb(a)fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Description of problem: We have a large variety of documentation guides serving a wide range of different users. It may be difficult for users arriving at docs.fp.o to know where to start, especially if they are new to Fedora/Linux and are unfamiliar with some of the technical terms. A note on the landing page suggesting a sensible starting point for new users could help alleviate this problem. Eg: "New to Fedora? You can try Fedora on your PC without touching your existing installation by following the Live Image Guide." The end of the Live Image guide helpfully points users to the Installation guide if they want to install :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.

1 11

[Bug 654484] New: New Bugzilla component for Storage Administration Guide
by Red Hat Bugzilla 16 Dec '14

16 Dec '14

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: New Bugzilla component for Storage Administration Guide https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=654484 Summary: New Bugzilla component for Storage Administration Guide Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Platform: Unspecified OS/Version: Unspecified Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: docs-requests AssignedTo: eric(a)christensenplace.us ReportedBy: r.landmann(a)redhat.com QAContact: fedora-docs-list(a)redhat.com CC: stickster(a)gmail.com, kwade(a)redhat.com, nb(a)fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Please create a component for the Storage Administration Guide; default assignee should be ddomingo(a)redhat.com Cheers Rudi -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.

1 6

[Bug 450331] New: lack of documentation on restoring from bare-metal (UUID problem)
by Red Hat Bugzilla 03 Apr '13

03 Apr '13

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450331 Summary: lack of documentation on restoring from bare-metal (UUID problem) Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: docs-requests AssignedTo: kwade(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: czar(a)acm.org QAContact: stickster(a)gmail.com CC: fedora-docs-list(a)redhat.com Description of problem: ref: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449299 There is a lack of documentation on restoring a system from bare metal. I have found (see reference) that restore the root ("/") is not as simple as as just executing the restore command when running in rescue mode. With the current emphasis being place on use of UUIDs in both Fedora and RHEL, the whole business of UUIDs need to be better documented. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): Fedora 9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 14

[Bug 595695] New: Direct links to RNs broken.
by Red Hat Bugzilla 31 Aug '12

31 Aug '12

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Direct links to RNs broken. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=595695 Summary: Direct links to RNs broken. Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: docs-requests AssignedTo: eric(a)christensenplace.us ReportedBy: eric(a)christensenplace.us QAContact: fedora-docs-list(a)redhat.com CC: stickster(a)gmail.com, kwade(a)redhat.com Classification: Fedora Description of problem: * Previously, the release notes were located at http://docs.fedoraproject.org/release-notes/ * Their location has changed to release specific URLs. * A link to the release notes is provided in fedora-bookmarks. * fedora-bookmarks are imported by the browser only on *first launch* so as to not overwrite user modifications. The new bookmarks layout causes two problems: 1. Nobody filed a fedora-bookmarks bug so Fedora 13 (and anyone on F-11 or F-12 etc) will default to going to http://docs.fedoraproject.org/release-notes/ which is a 404. Since the bookmarks can only be imported on first launch, we cannot push an update to fix this if the user has launched the browser (which is extremely likely). 2. Even if I were to fix the bookmarks page to point directly to a specific release version (which again would take effect only if someone would yum update before launching Firefox), then if anyone updated to F-14, the bookmark would not change and would still point to e.g. F-13. So, I do not think that we should put version specific information into our bookmarks URLs. To solve both of the above problems, I believe we should try to do some User-Agent detection and redirection. Fedora browsers have an RPM NVR attached to them. For example: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; es-ES; rv:1.9.2.4) Gecko/20100517 Fedora/3.6.4-1.fc13 Firefox/3.6.4 This tells us that the user's installed language is es-ES and it's a Fedora browser, specifically running F-13. We should then redirect queries to http://docs.fedoraproject.org/release-notes/ to http://docs.fedoraproject.org/es-ES/Fedora/13/html/Release_Notes/index.html If we cannot figure any information out about the Fedora release or language (or there are no relnotes in that language), I propose the default redirect should be to the en-US version of the latest Fedora release notes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.

1 11

[Bug 699833] New: Add FreeIPA docs to Fedora docs site
by Red Hat Bugzilla 19 Oct '11

19 Oct '11

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Add FreeIPA docs to Fedora docs site https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=699833 Summary: Add FreeIPA docs to Fedora docs site Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Platform: Unspecified OS/Version: Unspecified Status: NEW Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Component: docs-requests AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dlackey(a)redhat.com QAContact: fedora-docs-list(a)redhat.com CC: stickster(a)gmail.com, kwade(a)redhat.com, nb(a)fedoraproject.org, eric(a)christensenplace.us, oglesbyzm(a)gmail.com Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- The FreeIPA (freeipa.org) documentation is currently hosted on a personal fedorapeople site. For continuity and more community involvement, we would like to move the FreeIPA docs to the Fedora documentation site: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/index.html The docs are currently here: http://obriend.fedorapeople.org/freeIPA2.0/Identity_and_Policy_Management_G… This project is currently included in F14 and F15. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.

1 10

[Bug 693635] New: Intel Mac and Live USB
by Red Hat Bugzilla 01 Sep '11

01 Sep '11

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Intel Mac and Live USB https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=693635 Summary: Intel Mac and Live USB Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Platform: x86_64 OS/Version: Mac OS Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: unspecified Component: docs-requests AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: earthwormgaz(a)googlemail.com QAContact: fedora-docs-list(a)redhat.com CC: stickster(a)gmail.com, kwade(a)redhat.com, nb(a)fedoraproject.org, eric(a)christensenplace.us, oglesbyzm(a)gmail.com Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Description of problem: Hi, I just spent a couple of days trying to put the F15 Alpha Live CD image onto a USB stick for use with my Macbook Pro. It turns out this isn't possible. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Live_USB#Limitations I think this ought to go on the documentation somewhere, just to save people time. In my case, my CD drive is dead, so I can't install Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.

2 14

[Bug 504066] New: CMS for docs.fp.org
by Red Hat Bugzilla 26 Jun '11

26 Jun '11

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: CMS for docs.fp.org https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504066 Summary: CMS for docs.fp.org Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: project-tracking AssignedTo: kwade(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: mel(a)redhat.com QAContact: kwade(a)redhat.com CC: fedora-docs-list(a)redhat.com Classification: Fedora Zikula chosen, working on test instances and project plan with Zikula team -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 57

[danishka@gmail.com: Re: [Fedora-spins] 640MB memory for remix]
by Paul W. Frields 28 May '11

28 May '11

>From the Spins list. I know Adam Williamson recently reopened the following bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499585 Could someone check the current git content and make sure we capture this change in 'master' and any further update on the F15 branch? Paul ----- Forwarded message from Danishka Navin <danishka(a)gmail.com> ----- Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 12:50:55 +0530 From: Danishka Navin <danishka(a)gmail.com> To: Bruno Wolff III <bruno(a)wolff.to> Cc: The Spin Special Interest Group mailing list <spins(a)lists.fedoraproject.org>, Rahul Sundharam <rahulsundaram(a)gmail.com>, "Paul W. Frields" <pfrields(a)fedoraproject.org> Subject: Re: [Fedora-spins] 640MB memory for remix As per our web site minimum memory requirement is 768 MB. I think we must revert the release notes. Download Requirements - 400 MHz Pentium Pro or better processor (comparable AMD, Cyrix, and VIA processors also acceptable) - At least 768 MB memory (RAM), 1 GB recommended for best performance - 10 GB disk space / storage But acording to the release notes..... - Recommended for text-mode: 200 MHz Pentium Pro or better - Recommended for graphical: 400 MHz Pentium Pro or better - Minimum RAM for text-mode: 256 MiB - Minimum RAM for graphical: 384 MiB - Recommended RAM for graphical: 512 MiB http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/15/html/Release_Notes/sect-Relea… On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 7:27 PM, Bruno Wolff III <bruno(a)wolff.to> wrote: > On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 19:09:00 +0530, > Danishka Navin <danishka(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I just installed a Fedora 15 based remix and it asking for 640MB of > memory > > for i386 release. > > but this was not appear when I build the same when F15 beta was > available. > > The memory requirement should drop for F16. > > > Btw, There is no "Install to Hard Disk" icon in the Desktop. > > I believe it should show up in favorites if you are using gnome. > For other desktops you may need to do some work to get one for your remix. > -- Danishka Navin http://danishkanavin.blogspot.com http://twitter.com/danishkanavin http://identi.ca/danishka ----- End forwarded message -----

4 5

RE: docs Digest, Vol 87, Issue 18
by yagami raito 27 May '11

27 May '11

Hi ,, Thanks for the quick answer . I got it now But please help . I have another big problem :( when I boot with the live CD that I mad , It works just the problem is the contrast is very very very low . I barly can see those unity icons and I even can´t see the mouvement of the mouse .. which means its just dark*dark the same problem happened to me with another distro " Mageia RC " I installed it and when I amorce it its just black again ;( Please dont tell me there is no solution for this problem . I really liked this new Fedora with Gnome3 and I wanna work on it Thanks for help :)

1 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

docs May 2011