This is an automated message to remind you that we will be meeting at 1400 UTC in #fedora-meeting. Unless we've previously agreed that we will not be meeting today.
Hi folks,
I was wondering if anyone's interested in helping make a brochure for
F18? I remember we had this for Leonidas (I think?), but it hasn't been
kept up to date with each release really.
A brochure is a great resource for ambassadors and marketers, since it's
cheap and shows off the new release's talking points at the same time.
The feature freeze has just happened, and we could maybe begin working
on one for F18?
What d'ya folks think?
--
Thanks,
Warm regards,
Ankur: "FranciscoD"
Please only print if necessary.
Looking to contribute to Fedora? Look here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Join_SIGhttp://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinhahttp://dodoincfedora.wordpress.com/
Meeting summary
---------------
* Roll Call (bcotton, 14:00:43)
* Follow up on last week's action items (bcotton, 14:05:11)
* ACTION: Sparks to add relevant git commands to QA procedures
(bcotton, 14:05:56)
* ACTION: bcotton to send call for volunteers for QA Wrangler to
mailing list (bcotton, 14:06:07)
* ACTION: ianweller to ask the guys behind the packages app if man
pages is a thing they can do (bcotton, 14:06:18)
* Using koji to publish docs.fp.o (bcotton, 14:06:28)
* LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Automating_publishing
(bcotton, 14:06:35)
* LINK:
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/docs/2012-August/014488.html
(bcotton, 14:13:32)
* ACTION: Sparks to follow up with releng on the progress of koji
(bcotton, 14:20:09)
* Publish man pages (bcotton, 14:24:42)
* BZ 828669 (bcotton, 14:24:50)
* AGREED: this topic is tabled as an agenda item (bcotton, 14:31:22)
* QA recap (bcotton, 14:31:37)
* LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Docs_QA_Procedure (bcotton,
14:31:47)
* Open Help Conference (bcotton, 14:37:57)
* LINK: http://openhelpconference.com (bcotton, 14:38:09)
* Open Help Conference is Aug 11-15 in Cincinnati, OH (bcotton,
14:38:27)
* Outstanding BZ Tickets (bcotton, 14:39:47)
* LINK: http://tinyurl.com/lbrq84 (bcotton, 14:39:53)
* LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=808103
(randomuser, 14:42:34)
* ACTION: Sparks to test BZ entity in a guide and coordinate with l10n
(bcotton, 14:49:22)
* Open Floor Discussion (bcotton, 14:51:30)
* The Fedora Accessibility package has been retired. It was old and
crusty needed to be shot. (Sparks, 14:52:32)
* OpenSSL guide has been moved to git and I'm going to try to
resurrect it for F18. (Sparks, 14:53:23)
Meeting ended at 14:58:37 UTC.
Action Items
------------
* Sparks to add relevant git commands to QA procedures
* bcotton to send call for volunteers for QA Wrangler to mailing list
* ianweller to ask the guys behind the packages app if man pages is a
thing they can do
* Sparks to follow up with releng on the progress of koji
* Sparks to test BZ entity in a guide and coordinate with l10n
Action Items, by person
-----------------------
* bcotton
* bcotton to send call for volunteers for QA Wrangler to mailing list
* Sparks
* Sparks to add relevant git commands to QA procedures
* Sparks to follow up with releng on the progress of koji
* Sparks to test BZ entity in a guide and coordinate with l10n
* **UNASSIGNED**
* ianweller to ask the guys behind the packages app if man pages is a
thing they can do
People Present (lines said)
---------------------------
* bcotton (57)
* Sparks (38)
* randomuser (16)
* lnovich (15)
* claneys (6)
* jjmcd (5)
* zodbot (3)
Minutes:
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2012-08-06/fedora_docs.2012…
10:58 < zodbot> Minutes (text):
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2012-08-06/fedora_docs.2012…
10:58 < zodbot> Log:
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2012-08-06/fedora_docs.2012…
--
Ben Cotton
Fedora Docs Leader
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 08/06/2012 11:34 AM, Yuri Chornoivan wrote:
> написане Mon, 06 Aug 2012 18:26:51 +0300, Eric "Sparks"
> Christensen <sparks(a)fedoraproject.org>:
>
>>
>> The Docs Project is considering a change to the Publican Fedora
>> brand that will make one line fuzzy in Feedback.xml. The change
>> is removing the link to bugzilla and replacing it with an
>> variable entity which will improve the user's ability to provide
>> feedback.
>>
>> In order for this to be successful we'll need the translators to
>> fix this fuzzy line before F18 release. It would be great if
>> this could be fixed well before F18 (say, in the next couple of
>> weeks) so our F18 documentation could go out correctly.
>>
>> Do any translators have a concern about being able to make this
>> fix?
>
>
> Hi,
>
> Just to be sure, is it this project on Zanata
>
> https://translate.zanata.org/zanata/iteration/view/publican-common/2
>
> or something else?
>
> Thanks in advance for your answer.
Actually it is publican-fedora[0] but I don't see any data in Zanata
for the project. I also don't see anything over in Transifex so I'm
not sure where the bits are. I'll have to check with Rudi on this.
[0] https://translate.zanata.org/zanata/project/view/publican-fedora
- -Eric
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/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=TpxB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
The Docs Project is considering a change to the Publican Fedora brand
that will make one line fuzzy in Feedback.xml. The change is removing
the link to bugzilla and replacing it with an variable entity which
will improve the user's ability to provide feedback.
In order for this to be successful we'll need the translators to fix
this fuzzy line before F18 release. It would be great if this could
be fixed well before F18 (say, in the next couple of weeks) so our F18
documentation could go out correctly.
Do any translators have a concern about being able to make this fix?
Thanks,
Eric
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Eric "Sparks" Christensen
Fedora Project - https://fedoraproject.org
Member of:
* Fedora Board
* Documentation Project
097C 82C3 52DF C64A 50C2 E3A3 8076 ABDE 024B B3D1
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/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=/gI8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
This is an automated message to remind you that we will be meeting at 1400 UTC in #fedora-meeting. Unless we've previously agreed that we will not be meeting today.
Hi guys -- for any of you not on the Publican mailing list, you might
want to take a look!
We originally intended to build a test site with a large selection of
Fedora books, but it turns out there's:
1. a lot of broken stuff checked into the repos of various books;
particularly translations
2. a lot of poorly-formatted Revision Histories, which Publican 3.0
spits out because it's much stricter about enforcing rpmlint standards
on the packages it produces
This means it's likely there's a lot of one-off pain in cleaning up
various books in various languages when we eventually move to packaging
books and maintaining the site with RPMs. It won't affect books on the
current site when Publican 3.0 hits the repos though.
Feedback most welcome, either here or on Publican list!
Cheers
Rudi
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: [publican-list] Publican 3 demo sites
Date: Sat, 04 Aug 2012 17:44:53 +1000
From: Jeff Fearn <jfearn(a)redhat.com>
Reply-To: Publican discussions <publican-list(a)redhat.com>
Organization: Red Hat
To: Publican List <publican-list(a)redhat.com>
Hi, I've finally had the opportunity to put up demo sites for Publican
3. We were expecting to have a large demo site with the Fedora books on
it, but that hasn't been possible, so I've redone my Fedora People site
with both styles.
We now support two web styles, the original web style 1 layout and a new
web style 2. P3 does require all books and splash pages to be rebuilt.
This is due to abstracting the web style from the HTML, the goal being
you can build the books once and switch the site between web styles
without rebuilding the books. We've also stopped shipping the brands in
the books, so brand updates can be applied without rebuilding books.
You can see the jazzed up web style 1 here:
http://jfearn.fedorapeople.org/style_1
You can see the new web style 2 here:
http://jfearn.fedorapeople.org/en-US/index.html
Cheers, Jeff.
_______________________________________________
publican-list mailing list
publican-list(a)redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/publican-list
Wiki: https://fedorahosted.org/publican
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
A few weeks ago we received a ticket[0] asking about publishing man
pages for Fedora on the Internet. We know that there are other man
pages out there however we have found that they may not be up to date
with the versions that are in Fedora.
The overall opinion, that I've seen, is that this would be something
that might be worthwhile *if* we can script the entire process.
Does anyone have any ideas for doing this or have any opinions on
doing this?
[0] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=828669
- -- Eric
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Fedora Project - https://fedoraproject.org
Member of:
* Fedora Board
* Documentation Project
097C 82C3 52DF C64A 50C2 E3A3 8076 ABDE 024B B3D1
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/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=H1Pr
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----