30 Sep
2004
30 Sep
'04
10:36 a.m.
On Thu, 2004-09-30 at 05:45, Karsten Wade wrote:
On Wed, 2004-09-29 at 15:38, Tommy Reynolds wrote:
Uttered Christian Huegel christian.huegel@redhatforum.net, spake thus:
The line: <xref linkend="ch-tutorial"><xref> and <xref linkend="s1-tutorial-parent"></xref>
Well, actually, since the content model for <xref> is EMPTY, the proper form should be:
<xref linkend="foo" />
Ha! Another SGMLism sneaking through.
<grin/> No Karsten. This came in with XML 1.0. An SGML empty element is <xref></xref>
It was one of the 'short cuts'?
--
Regards DaveP.
XSLT&Docbook FAQ
http://www.dpawson.co.uk/xsl