Hi everyone,
i´ve noticed a small error on the documentation guide (Chapter 6.29) The line: <xref linkend="ch-tutorial"><xref> and <xref linkend="s1-tutorial-parent"></xref>
should be:
<xref linkend="ch-tutorial"></xref> and <xref linkend="s1-tutorial-parent"></xref>
It´s a missing end-tag. Can you correct this?
Have a nice day
Christian
Uttered Christian Huegel christian.huegel@redhatforum.net, spake thus:
The line: <xref linkend="ch-tutorial"><xref> and <xref linkend="s1-tutorial-parent"></xref>
Well, actually, since the content model for <xref> is EMPTY, the proper form should be:
<xref linkend="foo" />
Cheers!
On Wed, 2004-09-29 at 15:38, Tommy Reynolds wrote:
Uttered Christian Huegel christian.huegel@redhatforum.net, spake thus:
The line: <xref linkend="ch-tutorial"><xref> and <xref linkend="s1-tutorial-parent"></xref>
Well, actually, since the content model for <xref> is EMPTY, the proper form should be:
<xref linkend="foo" />
Ha! Another SGMLism sneaking through.
Christian, can you file a bug report for this? The Product should be "Fedora Core", the component "fedora-docs", Version "devel".
Thanks for the good bug catch!
- Karsten
Karsten Wade wrote:
On Wed, 2004-09-29 at 15:38, Tommy Reynolds wrote:
Uttered Christian Huegel christian.huegel@redhatforum.net, spake thus:
The line: <xref linkend="ch-tutorial"><xref> and <xref linkend="s1-tutorial-parent"></xref>
Well, actually, since the content model for <xref> is EMPTY, the proper form should be:
<xref linkend="foo" />
Ha! Another SGMLism sneaking through.
Christian, can you file a bug report for this? The Product should be "Fedora Core", the component "fedora-docs", Version "devel".
Thanks for the good bug catch!
- Karsten
As good as done..
Have a nice day
Christian
On Thu, 2004-09-30 at 01:55, Christian Huegel wrote:
Karsten Wade wrote:
On Wed, 2004-09-29 at 15:38, Tommy Reynolds wrote:
Uttered Christian Huegel christian.huegel@redhatforum.net, spake thus:
The line: <xref linkend="ch-tutorial"><xref> and <xref linkend="s1-tutorial-parent"></xref>
Well, actually, since the content model for <xref> is EMPTY, the proper form should be:
<xref linkend="foo" />
PSGML mode still allows me to close it with </xref>. Should we change the docs guide to use this method instead?
Ha! Another SGMLism sneaking through.
Christian, can you file a bug report for this? The Product should be "Fedora Core", the component "fedora-docs", Version "devel".
Thanks for the good bug catch!
- Karsten
As good as done..
Have a nice day
Christian
I added the missing / in CVS and the website. It should appear shortly.
Tammy
On Thu, 2004-09-30 at 05:45, Karsten Wade wrote:
On Wed, 2004-09-29 at 15:38, Tommy Reynolds wrote:
Uttered Christian Huegel christian.huegel@redhatforum.net, spake thus:
The line: <xref linkend="ch-tutorial"><xref> and <xref linkend="s1-tutorial-parent"></xref>
Well, actually, since the content model for <xref> is EMPTY, the proper form should be:
<xref linkend="foo" />
Ha! Another SGMLism sneaking through.
<grin/> No Karsten. This came in with XML 1.0. An SGML empty element is <xref></xref>
It was one of the 'short cuts'?
On Thu, 2004-09-30 at 16:02, Tammy Fox wrote:
Well, actually, since the content model for <xref> is EMPTY, the proper form should be:
<xref linkend="foo" />
PSGML mode still allows me to close it with </xref>. Should we change the docs guide to use this method instead?
Either is syntactically correct according to XML 1.0 production 44 [1]. psgml isn't a good validator, its author admits as much. My preference is for rxp for a validator. For the example above, I guess <xref linkend=""/> might be nominally preferable.
[1]http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-xml11-20040204/#dt-eetag
Regards DaveP. XSLT&Docbook FAQ http://www.dpawson.co.uk/xsl
docs@lists.stg.fedoraproject.org
-
christian.huegel -
Dave Pawson -
Karsten Wade -
Tammy Fox -
Tommy Reynolds