On Fri, Feb 03, 2012 at 05:59:00PM +0100, Nicola Soranzo wrote:
Il giorno ven, 03/02/2012 alle 09.47 -0600, Ian Weller ha scritto:
On Fri, Feb 03, 2012 at 02:44:55PM +0100, Nicola Soranzo wrote:
- python-apipkg, review request https://bugzilla.redhat.com/652034
Just looked a little bit more and it looks like python-py is bundling this from upstream, and that's not okay either :) So I'll add that review request to the list and also note that I need to submit a bug against python-py to unbundle apipkg.
It looks like that both apipkg and py are maintained by the same guy (Holger Krekel):
http://bitbucket.org/hpk42/apipkg https://bitbucket.org/hpk42/py
apipkg is probably just a subset of py.
I'm going to ask upstream if apipkg is updated properly in py, and then ask the python-py maintainer to add a Provides: python-apipkg. And then close the python-apipkg review request assuming that all goes through just fine.
Or maybe I'll ask FPC.
(This is stupid.)
On Fri, Feb 03, 2012 at 11:15:55AM -0600, Ian Weller wrote:
On Fri, Feb 03, 2012 at 05:59:00PM +0100, Nicola Soranzo wrote:
Il giorno ven, 03/02/2012 alle 09.47 -0600, Ian Weller ha scritto:
On Fri, Feb 03, 2012 at 02:44:55PM +0100, Nicola Soranzo wrote:
- python-apipkg, review request https://bugzilla.redhat.com/652034
Just looked a little bit more and it looks like python-py is bundling this from upstream, and that's not okay either :) So I'll add that review request to the list and also note that I need to submit a bug against python-py to unbundle apipkg.
It looks like that both apipkg and py are maintained by the same guy (Holger Krekel):
http://bitbucket.org/hpk42/apipkg https://bitbucket.org/hpk42/py
apipkg is probably just a subset of py.
I'm going to ask upstream if apipkg is updated properly in py, and then ask the python-py maintainer to add a Provides: python-apipkg. And then close the python-apipkg review request assuming that all goes through just fine.
Or maybe I'll ask FPC.
(This is stupid.)
I haven't inspected code, just file locations and names but it looks like it should be unbundled and packaged separately.
pyhton-py includes: /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/py/_apipkg.py
This is not a toplevel module and it's marked as private (_* is convention for private). So the module in py is not equivalent to a separate package. Which means that we don't have two packages providing the same thing. We have one package that's bundling another.
-Toshio
docs@lists.stg.fedoraproject.org