On 02/22/2012 06:42 AM, John J. McDonough wrote: >> On Wed, 2012-02-22 at 09:56 +0100, Romain Forlot wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> Draft is ready, wrotes by jjcmd, I clean up wiki page and I don't see what >>> to do now. >>> >>> What's the next ? >> Probably should have someone like Robyn who is maybe more in tune with >> the whole release, or maybe some marketing person, look it over. >Oh, yes, here's my B.M.T.F. (Beefy Miracle Tuning Fork) :)
>* Re: OpenStack: Essex isn't released yet, and won't be until April. So >I think it's hard to say that Essex is in Alpha, though we expect what's >in F17 to be updated to the final version of essex before release time. >I would honestly just say "OpenStack, CloudStack, Eucalyptus, and >OpenNebula". Ok I change wiki page to fit about that. >* New Xen API and oVirt aren't done being packaged yet. FESCo has given >them both a bit of a pass as they're "shiny marketing" things, and while >I expect they'll both be done, I don't know that we want to tell people >that they're there to try if they aren't. I remove these parts but leaves features almost including in F17. Is it good to include Xen API and oVirt news with reservations ? >* JBOSS should be JBoss Fixed >* Multitouch should probably land under end-user features Fixed too >* Do we even support Jigdo anymore?? Good question, I even don't heard about this thing. I don't know what to do about it. Someone knows if it is supported ? >* One last comment: The "Release Overview" section says this: "The >following sections provide a brief overview of major changes from the >last release of Fedora." The "What's New in F17" reads a bit more like >Marketing stuff (not that I have any problems with that! :D) - but I do >wonder about detailing any of the significant changes that are more >under-the-hood. Things like /usr move, firewalld, for example. I added parts to talk about this two things with Network Zones but I don't see any else forgotten big features.
BTW,I like your touch-ups.
They go well in hand with the Release Announcement ;) (I'm not quite done with it, but it's got a huge excellent start.)
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/F17_Alpha_release_announcement
Thoughts welcomed on any comments above....
-r --McD
Thanks.
-- *Romain Forlot*
pub 4096R/862907E5 2011-05-26 Key fingerprint = 4549 A7CA 17DC D0AA 0FE0 7953 E6A8 A0C8 8629 07E5 uid Romain Forlot rforlot@yahoo.com sub 4096R/153E34C2 2011-05-26
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 7:50 AM, Romain Forlot rforlot@yahoo.com wrote:
On 02/22/2012 06:42 AM, John J. McDonough wrote: >* Do we even support Jigdo anymore?? Good question, I even don't heard about this thing. I don't know what to do about it. Someone knows if it is supported ?
I believe it was dropped as of F16: http://news.gmane.org/find-root.php?message_id=%3c1321313929.1730.3.camel%40...
-T.C.
Le 23 févr. 2012 16:41, "T.C. Hollingsworth" tchollingsworth@gmail.com a écrit :
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 7:50 AM, Romain Forlot rforlot@yahoo.com wrote:
On 02/22/2012 06:42 AM, John J. McDonough wrote:
- Do we even support Jigdo anymore??
Good question, I even don't heard about this thing. I don't know what to do about it. Someone knows if it is supported ?
I believe it was dropped as of F16:
http://news.gmane.org/find-root.php?message_id=%3c1321313929.1730.3.camel%40...
Exactly. also removed from websites https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/532#comment:11
-T.C.
docs mailing list docs@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/docs
2012/2/23 T.C. Hollingsworth tchollingsworth@gmail.com:
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 7:50 AM, Romain Forlot rforlot@yahoo.com wrote:
On 02/22/2012 06:42 AM, John J. McDonough wrote: >* Do we even support Jigdo anymore?? Good question, I even don't heard about this thing. I don't know what to do about it. Someone knows if it is supported ?
I believe it was dropped as of F16: http://news.gmane.org/find-root.php?message_id=%3c1321313929.1730.3.camel%40...
-T.C.
Ok, I removed this part. No more jigdo.
Guys, do the Release Notes link on http://stg.fedoraproject.org/en/get-prerelease could link to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_17_Alpha_release_notes ? Or any better link…
Cheers,
On Fri, 2012-02-24 at 16:40 +0100, Kévin Raymond wrote:
Guys, do the Release Notes link on http://stg.fedoraproject.org/en/get-prerelease could link to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_17_Alpha_release_notes ? Or any better link…
That would be a very good move. As we get close to beta, that link will point to the release notes under development. But for Alpha, it really should point to the Alpha release notes.
I guess I could put a redirect page at that address, tho. Indeed, that might be a better move. Nick, what do you think? If we change the link on get_prerelease now, will we remember to get it changed back? If I replace the current content there with a redirect link it will get replaced as soon as other content is available.
--McD
Cheers,
-- Kévin Raymond (shaiton) GPG-Key: A5BCB3A2
On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 5:09 PM, John J. McDonough wb8rcr@arrl.net wrote:
On Fri, 2012-02-24 at 16:40 +0100, Kévin Raymond wrote:
Guys, do the Release Notes link on http://stg.fedoraproject.org/en/get-prerelease could link to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_17_Alpha_release_notes ? Or any better link…
That would be a very good move. As we get close to beta, that link will point to the release notes under development. But for Alpha, it really should point to the Alpha release notes.
I guess I could put a redirect page at that address, tho. Indeed, that might be a better move. Nick, what do you think? If we change the link on get_prerelease now, will we remember to get it changed back? If I replace the current content there with a redirect link it will get replaced as soon as other content is available.
--McD
Cheers,
We don't really need a redirect, changing this link is really easy for the websites team and I will be happy to keep a reminder near my keyboard… :) Or I could already create the beta branch.
docs@lists.stg.fedoraproject.org