DotNet SIG February 2019

dotnet-sig@lists.stg.fedoraproject.org

2 participants
3 discussions

Re: Mono 4 issues and Mono 5
by Radka Janekova 01 Mar '19

01 Mar '19

Awesome Timotheus, thank you for all this work on mono! +dotnet-sig for more eyes Radka ------------------------------ *Radka Janeková* .NET Core QE Lead, Red Hat *radka.janek(a)redhat.com <radka.janek(a)redhat.com>* IRC: radka | Freenode: Rhea On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 9:50 PM Timotheus Pokorra <mailinglists(a)tpokorra.de> wrote: > Dear members of the Mono SIG group, > > I have been working in the past week on building Mono 5 for Fedora Rawhide. > > This has been made possible by the work of directhex, who fixed the build > for Debian. > For details on his work see https://github.com/mono/mono/issues/7445 > > The discussion lives at > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1436896 > > Unfortunately we are too late for the upcoming Fedora 30, since the change > affects quite a number of packages. > For Mono 4, we needed a bootstrap build, and filed it as a system wide > change: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Mono_4 > I will prepare a similar change proposal for Mono 5 for Fedora 31. > > Please can you look at the code, and evaluate if the package is properly > built? > The source is still here: > https://github.com/tpokorra/mono-5.x-fedora/tree/master/mono-5.18 > After the change proposal gets accepted, I would put it in the proper > source control in https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/mono > The package is built here: > https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/tpokorra/mono-5.18/ > > Another issue I want to bring up is the state of Mono 4 in Fedora 30. > I probably committed a mistake, by disabling the ppc64 builds for Mono due > to a long standing bug on that architecture. > I just did not want mono to be FTBFS for yet another Fedora release. > See the details here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1588734 > It seems, that now all packages depending on Mono cannot be built anymore, > because they still have ppc64 enabled. > What do you think, is this really a problem, and if yes, how can we > resolve it? > In Rawhide, things should go back to normal as soon as Mono 5 has landed. > Should we consider porting Mono 5 back to Fedora 30 after the Fedora 30 > release? But that would contradict calling it a system wide change... > Or we disable ppc64 in Fedora 30 altogether? It should be available in > Fedora 31 again. > > Any suggestions and help in testing and evaluating are welcome! > > All the best, > Timotheus > > _______________________________________________ > mono mailing list -- mono(a)lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to mono-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/mono@lists.fedoraproject.org >

2 1

[Fedocal] Reminder meeting : DotNet IRC Meeting
by rhea＠fedoraproject.org 20 Feb '19

20 Feb '19

Dear all, You are kindly invited to the meeting: DotNet IRC Meeting on 2019-02-21 from 16:30:00 to 17:00:00 Europe/Prague At fedora-meeting(a)irc.freenode.net The meeting will be about: This meeting is for team members of the .NET Core enablement team. For details see the [wiki page](https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/DotNet) Source: https://apps.fedoraproject.org/calendar/meeting/4933/

1 0

[Fedocal] Reminder meeting : DotNet IRC Meeting
by rhea＠fedoraproject.org 06 Feb '19

06 Feb '19

Dear all, You are kindly invited to the meeting: DotNet IRC Meeting on 2019-02-07 from 16:30:00 to 17:00:00 Europe/Prague At fedora-meeting(a)irc.freenode.net The meeting will be about: This meeting is for team members of the .NET Core enablement team. For details see the [wiki page](https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/DotNet) Source: https://apps.fedoraproject.org/calendar/meeting/4933/

1 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

DotNet SIG February 2019