elections-devel April 2014

elections-devel@lists.stg.fedorahosted.org

1 participants
15 discussions

[Fedora Elections] #21: Anonymize datasets
by fedora-badges 08 Dec '14

08 Dec '14

#21: Anonymize datasets -------------------------+-------------------------------------------------- Reporter: nigelj | Owner: nigelj Type: enhancement | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Release 0.2.0 Component: General | Version: 0.1.5 Keywords: | -------------------------+-------------------------------------------------- Apologies if this is how the system currently works. I'm posting this on behalf of the Fedora Board. We would like for our election voting tool to work like this: FAS2 user goes to vote, they authenticate. The voting system assigns the user a unique ID number. The user then votes, and confirms their vote. The "ballot" is stored but is tied only to this unique ID number (not to the FAS2 user/account). The FAS2 system records that the FAS2 user has voted, but does not store a correlation between the FAS2 account and the unique ID number attached to the ballot. Thus, we have a dataset showing the results, but it is anonymized automatically, and we still know who has (and has not) voted, just not who (or what) they voted for. Thanks in advance. --- 2008-07-29 19:26:00 changed by mmcgrath Just so we're clear. The idea is to ensure that the results of a ballot cannot in any way be tied to a user. We would also not want this data in logs on the elections app servers correct? This might make fraud more likely but then I'm not entirely sure how its any better or worse from that perspective with what we have now. G, can you think of any technical hurdles in implementing this? Spot/Board: Do you want us to anonymize the data that's already in the database? 2008-07-29 19:35:42 changed by spot Yes, that is the idea. We would not want a correlation between a ballot and a user anywhere, not even logs. If we're careful with ensuring that once a ballot is submitted, the FAS2 user is marked as having voted in an election, I don't think we open the door to any additional fraud possibilities. As to anonymizing the existing data, I'm not sure it is worth the effort. 2008-07-29 21:39:01 changed by jspaleta If we are going to be making changes to address the voting system... are we gonna make any effort to contact someone doing active research into electronic voting methods to get an idea as to existing workable implementation concepts that accomplish the desired anonymizing of the voting but also protect against fraud? -jef -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/elections/ticket/21> Fedora Elections <https://fedorahosted.org/elections/> Fedora Elections

1 7

[Fedora Elections] #25: Allow other voting methods
by fedora-badges 04 Oct '14

04 Oct '14

#25: Allow other voting methods ---------------------+------------------------------------------------------ Reporter: nigelj | Owner: nigelj Type: defect | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Release 0.3.0 Component: General | Version: trunk Keywords: | ---------------------+------------------------------------------------------ In addition to #24, it'd be nice to allow a simpler voting method, something like: for - abstain - against For would be +1, abstain 0, against -1 This makes it nice and easy to count etc. Is this something like you want as well Kevin? -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/elections/ticket/25> Fedora Elections <https://fedorahosted.org/elections/> Fedora Elections

1 9

[Fedora Elections] #20: Candidate and Community Q/A feature
by fedora-badges 16 Jul '14

16 Jul '14

#20: Candidate and Community Q/A feature -------------------------+-------------------------------------------------- Reporter: jspaleta | Owner: nigelj Type: enhancement | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Release 0.1.5 Component: General | Version: 0.1.0 Keywords: | -------------------------+-------------------------------------------------- Purpose: To generate a slate of community questions to ask each candidate in an election to help people do a side by side comparison of candidates's thoughts on important Fedora project issues as seen by the voting community. This involves 4 things 1)A way for community to write in questions for candidates 2)A way for community to vote for questions previously submitted by a certain deadline 3)A way for each candidate to answer "top" questions, by a certain deadline 4)Displaying all candidate answers to all "top" questions together side by side in context with the question. No commenting or revisioning beyond the deadline Notes: I am told that lmacken is working on a community idea storm like app which should be able to do 1) and 2) 3) is essentially setting some arbitrary limit to the number of questions candidates will be expected to ask, as part of the election announcement. You may want to supplement the community vote process with a small group selection step to weed out a highly inappropriate question. Once the slate of questions are selected the app would need to provide a space for each candidate to answer each of those selected questions. Such a space should be limited to a finite number of words per question, to discourage people like me from writing overly detailed responses. 4) just makes it fair. If an issue or answer is hotly contested a candidate-candidate debate can be done in a mailinglist or the blogosphere. -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/elections/ticket/20> Fedora Elections <https://fedorahosted.org/elections/> Fedora Elections

1 5

[Fedora Elections] #24: Allow other Fedora Groups to use the voting system
by fedora-badges 16 Jul '14

16 Jul '14

#24: Allow other Fedora Groups to use the voting system -------------------------+-------------------------------------------------- Reporter: nigelj | Owner: nigelj Type: enhancement | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Release 0.3.0 Component: General | Version: trunk Keywords: kevin | -------------------------+-------------------------------------------------- Just to keep a note here about it: Kevin (nirik) queried if the irc-support group could use the voting system to hold votes for themselves that are unrelated to board votes etc. This opens the door to a new feature where we have 'official' and 'unofficial' elections, for instance a Board election would be considered Official and would appear on the main page, but a irc-support group vote would be unofficial and appear on a page off the main page. It would also lower the permissions required to create such elections to something like: Create election requires would require either group: elections (official elections), or, group administrator of groups allowed to vote (unofficial elections) - extra groups could be added by 'elections' members if a case is made. This requires (for a totally self managed solution) that we go to a system where the UI is nicer (#8) and elections can be closed out by the election administrator. Kevin: What do you think? -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/elections/ticket/24> Fedora Elections <https://fedorahosted.org/elections/> Fedora Elections

1 11

[Fedora Elections] #34: "usefas" does not do validation on candidates
by fedora-badges 11 Jul '14

11 Jul '14

#34: "usefas" does not do validation on candidates ----------------------+----------------------------------------------------- Reporter: mmcgrath | Owner: nigelj Type: defect | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Component: General | Version: 0.2.1 Keywords: | ----------------------+----------------------------------------------------- when using 'usefas' for an election, entering the candidates names does not actually verify the names before saving to database. This causes an error later when trying to display the names if they are not correct. -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/elections/ticket/34> Fedora Elections <https://fedorahosted.org/elections/> Fedora Elections

1 2

[Fedora Elections] #23: Perform nomination process in-app
by fedora-badges 11 Jul '14

11 Jul '14

#23: Perform nomination process in-app -------------------------+-------------------------------------------------- Reporter: nigelj | Owner: nigelj Type: enhancement | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Release 0.2.0 Component: General | Version: 0.1.5 Keywords: | -------------------------+-------------------------------------------------- Something that I've considered a 'would be nice' thing to have in the application is to have the nomination process happen within the application. This would require the election to be 'loaded' into the application 1-2 months before the actual start, but would remove the wiki based process, it would however simplify the administrative overhead considerably. -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/elections/ticket/23> Fedora Elections <https://fedorahosted.org/elections/> Fedora Elections

1 4

[Fedora Elections] #32: Email function
by fedora-badges 10 Jun '14

10 Jun '14

#32: Email function -------------------------+-------------------------------------------------- Reporter: pfrields | Owner: nigelj Type: enhancement | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Component: General | Version: 0.2.1 Keywords: | -------------------------+-------------------------------------------------- We should consider having the election system produce email of voting results to the election owner(s). -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/elections/ticket/32> Fedora Elections <https://fedorahosted.org/elections/> Fedora Elections

1 4

[Fedora Elections] #33: Relicense Elections Guide to match Fedora Documentation licensing
by fedora-badges 09 Apr '14

09 Apr '14

#33: Relicense Elections Guide to match Fedora Documentation licensing ---------------------------+------------------------------------------------ Reporter: nigelj | Owner: Type: task | Status: new Priority: trivial | Milestone: Release 0.3.0 Component: Documentation | Version: trunk Keywords: | ---------------------------+------------------------------------------------ As I'm the sole writer of the docs so far, I give full permission for it to be relicensed under Creative Commons. Just documenting this. -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/elections/ticket/33> Fedora Elections <https://fedorahosted.org/elections/> Fedora Elections

1 3

[Fedora Elections] #37: Allow deletion or editing of a candidate
by fedora-badges 09 Apr '14

09 Apr '14

#37: Allow deletion or editing of a candidate ----------------------------+----------------------------------------------- Reporter: tremble | Owner: nigelj Type: enhancement | Status: new Priority: minor | Milestone: Release 0.5.0 (F14 Target) Component: Administration | Version: 0.2.1 Keywords: | ----------------------------+----------------------------------------------- At the minute there is no way to remove a duff candidate without going directly into the database... -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/elections/ticket/37> Fedora Elections <https://fedorahosted.org/elections/> Fedora Elections

1 1

[Fedora Elections] #35: Lack of back buttons in the admin interface
by fedora-badges 09 Apr '14

09 Apr '14

#35: Lack of back buttons in the admin interface ----------------------------+----------------------------------------------- Reporter: tremble | Owner: nigelj Type: enhancement | Status: new Priority: minor | Milestone: Release 0.5.0 (F14 Target) Component: Administration | Version: 0.2.1 Keywords: | ----------------------------+----------------------------------------------- When editing elections (that sounds bad) there is no link to take people back to the list of elections. There's a need to go through the whole thing and check the general "flow" -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/elections/ticket/35> Fedora Elections <https://fedorahosted.org/elections/> Fedora Elections

1 1

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

elections-devel April 2014