On Wed, 2014-03-26 at 15:13 -0400, Marcela Mašláňová wrote:
It's close to next question:
Does the review differ depending on who is building the package (cla+1
vs in the packager group)?
Let's say all Playground repositories packagers has to have cla+1, which
means they know enough about Legal, so they have to have it right.
As I argued previously, I wish the review would encompass a little more
checks that just making sure that the package passes the Licensing
Also, if we decide to go with the (semi)automatic reviews, the automatic
part of the review wouldn't need differ depending on the packager since
we would get it for *free* (i.e. very quickly).
The (smaller) manual part could differ. For example, a packager could do
a self-review if he has cla+1, otherwise he would need a review by some
other packager with cla+1.