epel-devel September 2007

epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

34 participants
40 discussions

FYI: Revelation and other pygtk2 apps in EL-5
by Stephen John Smoogen 29 Sep '07

29 Sep '07

Just an FYI for other people looking at this. Revelation and supposedly other apps that use pygtk2 will generate tracebacks in 5.0 due to a bug in the shipped version of pygtk2 (2.10.1). The fix showed somewhere between it and 2.10.4 which is what I needed to get the application working. I am going to try and figure out what patch does it so that hopefully it is a 5.2 fix (or a CentOS-We-Fix-Other-Broken-Code-For-Free repo until then). -- Stephen J Smoogen. -- CSIRT/Linux System Administrator How far that little candle throws his beams! So shines a good deed in a naughty world. = Shakespeare. "The Merchant of Venice"

3 3

Fedora EPEL Package Build Report 2007-09-28
by Fedora Koji Build System 28 Sep '07

28 Sep '07

Packages built and released for Fedora EPEL testing/5: 5 lyx-1.4.5.1-3.el5 NEW mathml-fonts-1.0-21.el5 : Mathematical symbol fonts NEW wavpack-4.41-1.el5 : A completely open audiocodec xine-lib-1.1.8-6.el5 yumex-2.0.2-1.el5 Packages built and released for Fedora EPEL testing/4: 1 NEW wavpack-4.41-1.el4 : A completely open audiocodec Changes in Fedora EPEL testing/5: lyx-1.4.5.1-3.el5 ----------------- * Thu Sep 27 2007 Rex Dieter <rdieter[AT]fedoraproject.org> 1.4.5.1-3 - epel: drop Requires(hint): wv (until wv is available) * Mon Sep 10 2007 Rex Dieter <rdieter[AT]fedoraproject.org> 1.4.5.1-2 - License: GPLv2+ - epel: drop aiksaurus support (until aiksaurus is available) mathml-fonts-1.0-21.el5 ----------------------- * Fri Jun 09 2006 Rex Dieter <rexdieter[AT]users.sf.net> 1.0-21 - update to BaKoMa4Lyx-1.1 (includes eufm10.ttf) - update %description wavpack-4.41-1.el5 ------------------ * Sat May 12 2007 Peter Lemenkov <lemenkov(a)gmail.com> 4.41-1 - Version 4.41 - Removed unnecessary --with-pic xine-lib-1.1.8-6.el5 -------------------- * Thu Sep 27 2007 Ville Skyttä <ville.skytta at iki.fi> - 1.1.8-6 - Enable wavpack support by default for all distros. yumex-2.0.2-1.el5 ----------------- * Fri Sep 28 2007 Tim Lauridsen <tla(a)rasmil.dk> - 2.0.2-1 - Release 2.0.2 Changes in Fedora EPEL testing/4: wavpack-4.41-1.el4 ------------------ * Sat May 12 2007 Peter Lemenkov <lemenkov(a)gmail.com> 4.41-1 - Version 4.41 - Removed unnecessary --with-pic For more information about the built packages please see the repository or the Fedora Info Feed: http://fedoraproject.org/infofeed/

1 0

add to wishlist: rsyslog
by Florin Andrei 27 Sep '07

27 Sep '07

Somebody who can edit the wishlist page - please add rsyslog to the list: http://www.rsyslog.com/ It looks like Fedora is moving towards rsyslog, it's already in the development tree, it would be nice to have it in EPEL. Thanks, -- Florin Andrei http://florin.myip.org/

4 7

Log from this weeks (200700926) EPEL SIG Meeting
by Thorsten Leemhuis 27 Sep '07

27 Sep '07

00:01:20 < knurd> | Hi everybody; who's around for the EPEL meeting? 00:01:20 * | knurd likes to remind everyone that the schedule for todays meeting as well as a list of all open tasks can be found on http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/Schedule 00:01:20 --- | knurd has changed the topic to: EPEL Sig meeting -- Meeting rules at http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/Schedule/MeetingGuidelines -- Init process 00:01:23 * | nirik looks around to see if there is an epel meeting. 00:01:34 --> | kwizart has joined #fedora-meeting 00:01:36 --> | kwizart is Unknown 00:01:42 * | mmcgrath here 00:02:01 * | nirik is here. 00:03:05 < knurd> | stahnma said he might miss te meeting 00:03:06 * | marek - Marek Mahut present. 00:03:27 * | quaid is here for a few minutes 00:03:30 < knurd> | well, let's start 00:03:44 * | knurd reshuffles the topic list 00:03:51 --- | knurd has changed the topic to: EPEL SIG Meeting | http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/PackageMaintainer/GenericJobDescription -- quaid 00:03:57 < knurd> | quaid, what's the status of this? 00:04:14 < knurd> | nobody complained on the list 00:04:36 < knurd> | so should we just say "this is it now" to finally get that relized and off the todo-list? 00:04:56 * | nirik pulls up the link to look at it. 00:04:59 < quaid> | um, homm 00:05:11 < quaid> | yep, that was it; no complaints, it's therefore done. 00:05:27 < quaid> | and can always be updated :) 00:05:28 * | abadger1999 sits in the bleachers 00:05:42 * | quaid doesn't think a ratification is needed to update it, so let it be wikiified 00:05:46 < knurd> | that okay for everybody? 00:05:51 < knurd> | quaid, +1 00:05:55 < nirik> | +1 from me 00:06:00 < mmcgrath> | +1 00:06:30 < knurd> | k, settled then 00:06:41 < quaid> | coo' 00:06:48 < knurd> | quaid, will you put the links on the front page and everywhere else where needed? 00:07:26 <-- | couf has quit (Read error: 110 (Connection timed out)) 00:07:28 --- | knurd has changed the topic to: EPEL SIG Meeting | http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/CommunicationPlan -- stahnma, quaid 00:07:35 < knurd> | quaid, same proceedure? 00:08:55 < knurd> | lala 00:08:56 < quaid> | yep 00:09:08 < knurd> | that fine for everyone? 00:09:09 < quaid> | I think I passed that one to the list for review, don't recall any further comments 00:09:38 < quaid> | I'm not likely to do any wiki relinking or stuff this week 00:09:42 < knurd> | quaid, that matches my memory 00:09:48 < quaid> | maybe leave me a new task for next week? 00:10:05 < knurd> | quaid, will do 00:10:21 < knurd> | anyway, no complains on http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/CommunicationPlan? then I consider it accepted 00:10:33 * | nirik reads. 00:10:38 < knurd> | we of couse can easily modify it later in any case without the meeting/list overhead 00:10:57 < nirik> | yeah, seems ok to me. 00:11:21 < knurd> | k, accepted then 00:11:31 --- | knurd has changed the topic to: EPEL SIG Meeting | http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/Tasks/Rhel51 -- unassigned 00:11:38 < knurd> | I added that task 00:11:50 < knurd> | there are some preparations we likely should do 00:12:09 < knurd> | e.g. -- remove yum-utils as it is now in RHEL? 00:12:11 < nirik> | fixing broken deps in testing? 00:12:23 < knurd> | or just leave it in EPEL for some more weeks until CentOS catches up? 00:12:26 < knurd> | nirik, that as well 00:12:39 < mmcgrath> | I think someone suggested 1 week or 2 weeks wait, I think either is fine. 00:12:40 < knurd> | nirik, you seem to be taking care of it in parts already 00:12:55 < mmcgrath> | and regarding yum-utils and python-imaging, I think those should be removed. 00:12:56 < knurd> | can you put that task on your plate? I'll help where needed 00:13:01 < nirik> | I would say we should file bugs against each of the packages that got pulled into rhel to dead.package their cvs and then we can remove them from the repo(s) 00:13:24 < mmcgrath> | though, perhaps, they're not doing any harm just sitting there and not updated (protect the e-v-r) 00:13:24 < nirik> | sure. 00:13:25 < knurd> | mmcgrath, will CentOS catch up withing 1 or 2 weeks? 00:13:34 < knurd> | mmcgrath, four weeks might be safer 00:13:43 < nirik> | catch up? meaning release 5.1? or ? 00:13:44 < mmcgrath> | not sure, what harm would come of it if they didn't? 00:14:06 --- | couf_ is now known as couf 00:14:08 * | knurd thinks about it 00:14:36 < knurd> | mmcgrath, stuff that might depend on yum-utils would create broken deps 00:14:48 < mmcgrath> | k 00:14:51 < knurd> | (at least is yum-utils is not in centos -- don't know) 00:15:05 < f13> | might I suggest that you leave the package in the repo until CentOS catches up, then drop them? 00:15:07 < knurd> | nirik, bugs sound fine 00:15:08 < mmcgrath> | if we're going to block on CentOS lets not pick a date, we'll let them do that. 00:15:13 < f13> | obviously you wouldn't do any new releases of them. 00:15:24 * | nirik is confused... we are talking about yum-utils? or 5.1? 00:15:24 < knurd> | mmcgrath, f13, yeah, sounds fine 00:15:32 < knurd> | there is also scientific linux 00:15:51 < knurd> | nirik, we are talking about when to remove yum-utils once 5.1 is out 00:16:21 < nirik> | ok. Is centos going to remove theirs as well? 00:16:52 < f13> | I would imagine so 00:16:54 < mmcgrath> | nirik: did centos add yum-utils? 00:16:56 < knurd> | nirik, I suppose they will switch to the one from RHEL? 00:17:13 < nirik> | Well, they have yum-utils in their extras repo. 00:17:29 < nirik> | note that they ship their own yum version, so not sure if they will switch to the RHEL one. 00:17:38 < knurd> | nirik, well, if it becomes a part of RHEL 5.1 it will be in centos-base 5.1 afaik 00:17:57 < nirik> | yeah, dunno. 00:18:10 < knurd> | well, let's simply wait and see 00:18:13 < nirik> | In any case waiting sounds fine to me. 00:18:13 < knurd> | and decide later 00:18:34 < knurd> | but somebody should take care of this and oher issues for 5.1 00:18:39 < knurd> | any volunteers? 00:19:07 < nirik> | I'm happy to work on bugging people about broken deps and trying to work on the repo. 00:19:13 < knurd> | e.g. put stuff like what we just discussed on the wiki page to make sure we get back to it when it happens 00:19:28 < knurd> | s/it happens/later/ 00:19:35 < nirik> | I can try and do that... 00:19:46 < knurd> | nirik, k; can we own that task together then? 00:19:54 * | nirik looks at the clock, hoping days would start being 30 hours each. 00:19:59 < nirik> | knurd: sounds good. 00:20:06 < knurd> | nirik, many thx 00:20:13 --- | knurd has changed the topic to: EPEL SIG Meeting | http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/Tasks/RhelMetaData -- stahnma 00:20:23 < knurd> | stahnma is not around 00:20:31 < knurd> | I sugest we skip this topic 00:20:42 --- | knurd has changed the topic to: EPEL SIG Meeting | http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/Tasks/KojiAndBodhiForEpel -- unassigned 00:20:49 < nirik> | sounds fine. I think it keeps needing more defintion of what it is. 00:20:55 < knurd> | nirik, +1 00:21:04 < knurd> | nirik, one reasons why I created the task pages 00:21:16 < knurd> | so we have a place to put that defintion ;-) 00:21:20 < nirik> | yep. 00:21:26 < knurd> | back to bodhi und koji 00:21:39 < knurd> | I think we all agree that we want to switch to them in the long run? 00:21:51 < nirik> | so this is blocked on koji being able to hide RHEL binaries, right? 00:22:03 < knurd> | nirik, this is the most important blocker yes 00:22:18 < knurd> | I suppose other problems might show up 00:22:26 < knurd> | but that one needs to be solved first 00:22:27 < nirik> | should we file a RFE or the like so at least we can see if the koji folks have it on the radar? 00:22:39 < knurd> | nirik, stuff like that 00:22:48 < knurd> | not sure if dgilmore has it on his radar 00:23:09 < knurd> | but a RFE would be a good start 00:23:41 < knurd> | and a owner for that task would help as well -- then koji developers know whom to contact in case of questions 00:23:42 <-- | llaumgui has quit (Connection timed out) 00:23:54 < nirik> | I'm happy to file a bug... I have no knowledge of koji internals tho, so I can't really work on coding anything. 00:24:18 < knurd> | nirik, k; can you put that # into the wiki please? and CC me? tia! 00:24:24 < nirik> | ok. 00:24:29 --- | knurd has changed the topic to: EPEL SIG Meeting | http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/Tasks/Misc -- yum-cron -- knurd 00:24:53 < knurd> | skipping that if that's okay for eveybody -- things are in hte works again 00:25:00 < knurd> | I gave a update on the list 00:25:07 --- | knurd has changed the topic to: EPEL SIG Meeting | http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/Tasks/Misc -- do more on the list and less in the meetings; "Power to the people with no delay." aka "make Steering Committee nearly unimportant" and "new schedule page" -- knurd 00:25:22 < knurd> | do you guys like what I did to the schedule page in the wiki? 00:25:51 < mmcgrath> | how does doing things on the list take anything away from the steering committee? 00:25:52 < nirik> | yeah, sounds fine to me. 00:26:24 < mmcgrath> | or is that part of the power to the people part :) 00:26:27 * | mmcgrath takes a look at the wiki 00:26:30 < knurd> | mmcgrath, more like in "if nobody complains on the list (or in the IRC meetings) its simply considered accepted" 00:26:39 < mmcgrath> | ah 00:26:43 < mmcgrath> | +1 from me 00:27:00 < knurd> | it's just a general idea IMHO 00:27:10 < knurd> | we just need to find way to realize that idea 00:27:20 < knurd> | the new stuff in the wiki is a first step for me 00:27:38 < knurd> | I hope we do more, but I don#t know yet exactly what to do 00:27:43 < knurd> | suggestions welcomed 00:27:49 --> | llaumgui (LLaumgui) has joined #fedora-meeting 00:27:50 --> | hircus (Michel Salim) has joined #fedora-meeting 00:28:24 * | knurd will move on if nobody wants to say more about this topic 00:28:38 --- | knurd has changed the topic to: EPEL SIG Meeting | Free discussion around EPEL 00:28:43 < knurd> | k, anything else? 00:29:09 < nirik> | I have a few quick items... 00:29:31 < knurd> | shot 00:29:35 < nirik> | I have almost caught up on security checking for epel... 00:30:07 < knurd> | nirik, great work, thx 00:30:09 < nirik> | there are some packages that were never built, but have branches. Might be good if we could gather a list of those and ping maintainers to build or work on deps to build 00:30:45 < nirik> | finally, did we ever determine about pushing from testing->stable more often? Or should I bring that up on the list again? 00:31:06 < knurd> | we said about every four weeks for pushing from testing->stable 00:31:15 < knurd> | but I had expected 5.1 would show up soon 00:31:24 < knurd> | so I thought we just wait for that this time 00:31:34 < nirik> | yeah, agreed. 00:31:44 < knurd> | "October" was the last date I heard for 5.1 00:31:56 --> | agoode (Adam Goode) has joined #fedora-meeting 00:32:08 < nirik> | I heard there were issues due to the main kernel being xen now or something... but it was all 3rd hand. 00:32:09 < knurd> | package with branches missing in EPEL > list & ping sounds like a good idea to me 00:32:27 < nirik> | mmcgrath: did you have a chance to automate the broken deps report for epel? 00:32:56 < mmcgrath> | Not for testing, I'll double check whats going on with that now that you mention it. 00:32:57 < dgilmore> | knurd: have what? 00:33:02 < knurd> | maybe some of the people from RH could give some inofficial hints so we know what's up? quaid, mmcgrath, warren? 00:33:36 < knurd> | dgilmore, talking with koji developer about improving koji in the long run so we can use it for EPEL 00:33:52 < quaid> | knurd: not if we like keeping our jobs :) 00:33:56 < mmcgrath> | knurd: the last news I heard was a month ago or so and it was just that there was a 5.1 coming :) 00:34:05 < quaid> | isn't there an 'official' word updated somewhere? 00:34:12 < quaid> | 5.1 list or something? 00:34:20 * | mmcgrath isn't sure. 00:34:32 * | knurd is not on rhel5-list 00:34:40 < dgilmore> | knurd: they have no resources to do it 00:34:50 < dgilmore> | it is maked as a nice to have thing 00:34:51 < knurd> | quaid, I don't want to have a real date, just a rough estimate 00:34:53 < knurd> | ;-) 00:34:58 < dgilmore> | but far from being on the radar 00:35:09 < mmcgrath> | knurd: I'll say sometime after today and before January 2028 :) 00:35:09 < knurd> | dgilmore, is there a RFE about it somewhere? 00:35:17 < dgilmore> | knurd: not that i know of 00:35:18 * | knurd slaps mmcgrath :-) 00:35:18 < quaid> | knurd: "any time after today"? 00:35:26 < warren> | knurd, I heard from an article "October" 00:35:27 < dgilmore> | only disccusions on it 00:35:49 < knurd> | warren, I read that in an article as well 00:35:51 < mmcgrath> | warren: do you know who's call that is? 00:36:01 < knurd> | dgilmore, nirik, well having a RFE can#t hurt 00:36:07 < knurd> | dgilmore, nirik plans to file one 00:36:27 < dgilmore> | knurd: thats fine 00:36:37 < dgilmore> | hosted.fp.o would be the correct place 00:36:38 < knurd> | thx for your support dgilmore 00:36:59 < warren> | mmcgrath, even if I did know the planned release day, we aren't allowed to talk about it. 00:37:09 < dgilmore> | i wish i had time to do the work myself 00:37:12 < nirik> | https://hosted.fedoraproject.org/projects/koji/ticket/49 (feel free to update/add info if I said something wrong there) 00:37:25 < knurd> | so, shall we wait for 5.1? 00:37:34 < knurd> | or simply start to clean up deps now 00:37:49 < nirik> | in testing? starting now is good. 00:37:52 < knurd> | and then just do the testing-> stable move ahead of 5.1? 00:37:58 < knurd> | nirik, yeah, testing 00:38:06 <-- | rdieter has quit (Remote closed the connection) 00:38:16 < knurd> | mmcgrath, are the dep scripts running for testing these days? 00:38:16 < nirik> | well, I think we should start asap... then we can decide if we want to just move ahead of 5.1 or wait... 00:38:31 < mmcgrath> | knurd: I don't think they are, I'll do that now. 00:38:31 < nirik> | but we need to get them fixed first 00:38:36 < knurd> | nirik, yeah, you're likely right 00:38:41 < knurd> | mmcgrath, many thx 00:39:17 < knurd> | nirik, let's see what comes out the dep script and decide on hte list then how to eactly move on 00:39:22 < knurd> | does that sounds like a plan? 00:39:45 < nirik> | sure. sounds good. 00:39:54 < knurd> | k 00:39:56 < nirik> | there is still one issue in the stable repo... with multilib. 00:39:58 < knurd> | anything else? 00:40:02 < knurd> | nirik, ? 00:40:12 < nirik> | dgilmore: did you have a chance to look at that? does mschwents changes/suggestions look sane? 00:40:29 < nirik> | oh, next week: meeting at alternate time? or this time? 00:40:48 < dgilmore> | nirik: i have not yet looked 00:41:05 < knurd> | did he send more improvments? what kind of? 00:41:21 < knurd> | nirik, I'd say we give the alternate time one more chance next week 00:41:41 < nirik> | well, some changes to Config_EPEL.py... basically some of the multilib blacklist doesn't seem right... 00:41:42 <-- | londo has quit ("Konversation terminated!") 00:41:52 --> | rdieter (Rex Dieter) has joined #fedora-meeting 00:42:07 < knurd> | why do we F7-style multilib in RHEL4 in any case? 00:42:09 < nirik> | for example in epel4, graphviz has a broken dep in x86_64. 00:42:11 < knurd> | is that wise? 00:42:38 < knurd> | in FC3 (which EL4 is based on) we IMHO multilibed only selected packages 00:42:39 < nirik> | and it should be blacklisted. It is, but it should be listed as 'graphviz-devel' thats blacklisted, not graphviz 00:43:04 < f13> | multilib /hard/. 00:43:06 < nirik> | dunno the history. 00:43:15 < dgilmore> | knurd: in FC-3 we dod not offer multilib at all 00:43:17 < knurd> | nirik, maybe I did add graphviz and not graphviz-devel 00:43:20 < knurd> | not sure 00:43:29 < dgilmore> | s/dod/did/ 00:43:30 < knurd> | dgilmore, extras not, but core did iirc 00:43:31 < nirik> | the graphviz one is the only one I know that causes broken deps. 00:43:48 < dgilmore> | knurd: we are using extras multilibing logic 00:43:53 < f13> | dgilmore: FE-3 maybe? 00:44:00 < f13> | I'm pretty sure FC-3 did multilib 00:44:03 < f13> | oh I see that's sorted out 00:44:11 < knurd> | dgilmore, I think that can be switched off completely 00:44:25 < knurd> | as FE5 iirc also did not use multilib 00:44:30 < knurd> | or was it FE4? 00:44:40 < nirik> | I think we should s/graphviz-devel/graphviz/ in the config and leave it at that. 00:44:42 < knurd> | of FE5 did only the whitelist multilib 00:44:46 < knurd> | nirik, +1 00:44:52 < nirik> | since we have already been doing multilib, less changes better. 00:44:54 * | mmcgrath brb 00:44:55 < dgilmore> | knurd: except we have already offered it. 00:45:03 < dgilmore> | nirik: thats probably sane 00:45:06 < knurd> | dgilmore, good point 00:45:12 < nirik> | dgilmore: yeah, so pulling it would be bad. agreed. 00:45:22 < knurd> | yeah 00:45:34 < knurd> | so we just blacklist what needs to be blacklisted 00:45:36 < knurd> | k 00:45:38 < knurd> | anything else? 00:45:55 < nirik> | knurd: shall I make that change? or you want to? I can fwd you the email from mschwent if you like. 00:46:06 < knurd> | nirik, feel free to do it 00:46:11 < nirik> | ok 00:46:20 * | nirik has nothing else. 00:46:24 < knurd> | nirik, seems you are already more familar with the scripts than I am... 00:46:35 * | knurd will close the meeting in 45 00:47:06 * | knurd will close the meeting in 15 00:47:23 < knurd> | -- MARK -- Meeting end

1 0

RFE: EPEL-testing (disabled) in epel-release?
by Gilboa Davara 27 Sep '07

27 Sep '07

Hello all, As the title suggest, will it be possible to ship a new epel-release RPM with epel-testing support? (As in fedora-update-testing, it should be disabled by default). This should add much needed testing to new package releases. - Gilboa

5 6

Fedora EPEL Package Build Report 2007-09-27
by Fedora Koji Build System 27 Sep '07

27 Sep '07

Packages built and released for Fedora EPEL testing/5: 6 NEW amavisd-new-2.4.5-1.el5 : Email filter with virus scanner and spamassassin support facter-1.3.8-1.el5 NEW optipng-0.5.5-1.el5 : A PNG optimizer and converter NEW python-fedora-0.2.90.19-1.el5 : Python modules for talking to Fedora Infrastructure Services python-iniparse-0.2.2-1.el5 xine-lib-1.1.8-5.el5 Packages built and released for Fedora EPEL testing/4: 1 facter-1.3.8-1.el4 Changes in Fedora EPEL testing/5: amavisd-new-2.4.5-1.el5 ----------------------- * Thu Feb 22 2007 Steven Pritchard <steve(a)kspei.com> 2.4.5-1 - Update to 2.4.5. facter-1.3.8-1.el5 ------------------ * Mon Sep 24 2007 David Lutterkort <dlutter(a)redhat.com> - 1.3.8-1 - Update license tag - Copy all of lib/ into ruby_sitelibdir optipng-0.5.5-1.el5 ------------------- * Tue Feb 06 2007 Till Maas <opensource till name> - 0.5.5-1 - Version bump python-fedora-0.2.90.19-1.el5 ----------------------------- * Tue Sep 25 2007 Toshio Kuratomi <a.badger(a)gmail.com> - 0.2.90.19-1 - New upstream release with a FAS2 unicode fix. * Mon Sep 24 2007 Toshio Kuratomi <a.badger(a)gmail.com> - 0.2.90.18-3 - Fix the Source URL. Should be fedorapeople rather than fedoraproject. * Fri Sep 21 2007 Toshio Kuratomi <a.badger(a)gmail.com> - 0.2.90.18-2 - BR: python-setuptools-devel as this has been split in the new versions. * Tue Sep 18 2007 Toshio Kuratomi <a.badger(a)gmail.com> - 0.2.90.18-1 - Update to version wih handling of control-center-maint bugzilla address. * Tue Sep 18 2007 Toshio Kuratomi <a.badger(a)gmail.com> - 0.2.90.17-2 - Minor touchups to description and URL. * Mon Sep 17 2007 Toshio Kuratomi <a.badger(a)gmail.com> - 0.2.90.17-1 - Update to 0.2.90.17. - Build separate packages for pieces useful on clients and only on the server. * Mon Sep 10 2007 Toshio Kuratomi <a.badger(a)gmail.com> - 0.2.90.16-1 - Bugfix to fasLDAP module. * Fri Sep 07 2007 Toshio Kuratomi <a.badger(a)gmail.com> - 0.2.90.15-1 - Make the fasLDAP module more OO. - Bugfixes. - Update the install line. python-iniparse-0.2.2-1.el5 --------------------------- * Tue Sep 25 2007 Tim Lauridsen <timlau(a)fedoraproject.org> - 0.2.2-1 - Updated to release 0.2.2 - removed patch to to fix problems with out commented lines, included in upstream source * Wed Sep 12 2007 Tim Lauridsen <timlau(a)fedoraproject.org> - 0.2.1-4 - Added some logic to get the right python-setuptools buildrequeres - based on the fedora version, to make the same spec file useful in - all fedora releases. * Mon Sep 10 2007 Tim Lauridsen <timlau(a)fedoraproject.org> - 0.2.1-3 - Added patch from upstream svn to fix problems with out commented lines. * Tue Aug 28 2007 Tim Lauridsen <timlau(a)fedoraproject.org> - 0.2.1-2 - Changed BuildRequires python-setuptools to python-setuptools-devel xine-lib-1.1.8-5.el5 -------------------- * Sun Sep 23 2007 Ville Skyttä <ville.skytta at iki.fi> - 1.1.8-5 - Enable JACK support by default for all distros. Changes in Fedora EPEL testing/4: facter-1.3.8-1.el4 ------------------ * Mon Sep 24 2007 David Lutterkort <dlutter(a)redhat.com> - 1.3.8-1 - Update license tag - Copy all of lib/ into ruby_sitelibdir For more information about the built packages please see the repository or the Fedora Info Feed: http://fedoraproject.org/infofeed/

1 0

Re: clamav
by Kevin Fenzi 26 Sep '07

26 Sep '07

On Mon, 27 Aug 2007, Dag Wieers wrote: >On Mon, 27 Aug 2007, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > >> Since Enrico never intended to maintain clamav in EPEL, he has >> formally orphaned clamav in EL-4 and EL-5. >> >> Is there anyone out there that would be willing to take it on? >> >> Preferably someone who likes/understands Enrico's package setup so >> you >> can stay in sync with Fedora versions? >> >> If no one steps up soon, I might be able to take it over, but I would >> be quite likely to radically change the packaging. >Before you do, let's discuss how we can make things compatible in order >to help existing users :) ok. Sorry for getting behind on this... It doesn't look like anyone wants to step up and maintain the current package in EPEL. Would you be interested in maintaining your package in EPEL? Or failing that, would you be willing to let me use your package and just keep it in sync with your version upstream? Obviously, there would need to be testing to confirm that it upgrades the old 0.88.x version currently in EPEL correctly, but I can work on that if you don't mind me basing on your package. Any other thoughts or ideas? kevin

12 20

Plan for todays (20070926) EPEL SIG meeting
by Thorsten Leemhuis 26 Sep '07

26 Sep '07

Hi all, find below the list of topics that are planed to come up in the next EPEL SIG meeting which is scheduled for today, Wednesday at 17:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.org. /topic EPEL SIG Meeting | http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/Tasks/RhelMetaData -- stahnma /topic EPEL SIG Meeting | http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/Tasks/Rhel51 -- unassigned /topic EPEL SIG Meeting | http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/Tasks/KojiAndBodhiForEpel -- unassigned /topic EPEL SIG Meeting | http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/Tasks/Misc -- yum-cron -- knurd /topic EPEL SIG Meeting | http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/Tasks/Misc -- do more on the list and less in the meetings; "Power to the people with no delay." aka "make Steering Committee nearly unimportant" and "new schedule page" -- knurd /topic EPEL SIG Meeting | http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/CommunicationPlan -- stahnma, quaid /topic EPEL SIG Meeting | http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/PackageMaintainer/GenericJobDescription -- quaid /topic EPEL SIG Meeting | Free discussion around EPEL You want something to be discussed? Send a note to the list in reply to this mail and I'll add it to the schedule (I can't promise we will get to it tomorrow, but we'll most likely will if we don't run out of time). You can also propose topics at the end of the meeting itself. *If your name/nick is on above list*: please give a status update on the list and in the wiki on the individual task pages (linked from the schedule page: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/Schedule ). That way all the interested parties know what up ahead of the meeting; that will avoid long delays and "status update monologues in the meeting. Thanks! CU knurd

1 3

Pushing updates to EPEL
by David Lutterkort 24 Sep '07

24 Sep '07

I built a couple of packages 9 days ago, but htey are still sitting in plague with status 'needsign' ... am I missing an additional step ? What else do I need to do to get the packages added to/updated in EPEL ? David

2 1

Fedora EPEL Package Build Report 2007-09-24
by Fedora Koji Build System 24 Sep '07

24 Sep '07

Packages built and released for Fedora EPEL testing/5: 8 bugzilla-3.0.2-0.el5 NEW fedora-package-config-smart-5-1.el5 : Fedora EPEL configuration files for the Smart package manager NEW gkrellm-freq-1.0-7.el5 : CPU frequency display plugin for GKrellM NEW jack-audio-connection-kit-0.103.0-4.el5 : The Jack Audio Connection Kit NEW libid3tag-0.15.1b-4.el5 : ID3 tag manipulation library php-pear-MDB2-Driver-mysql-1.4.1-2.el5 NEW smart-0.51-49.el5 : Next generation package handling tool trac-bazaar-plugin-0.2-5.20070829bzr182.el5 Packages built and released for Fedora EPEL testing/4: 1 mercurial-0.9.4-8.el4 Changes in Fedora EPEL testing/5: bugzilla-3.0.2-0.el5 -------------------- * Mon Sep 24 2007 John Berninger <john at ncphotography dot com> - 3.0.2-0 - update to 3.0.2 - bz 299981 fedora-package-config-smart-5-1.el5 ----------------------------------- * Sun Sep 23 2007 Ville Skyttä <ville.skytta at iki.fi> - 5-1 - Initial EL-5 version based on Fedora's 6-8. - Add empty %build section. - License: GPL+ gkrellm-freq-1.0-7.el5 ---------------------- * Wed Sep 12 2007 Matthias Saou <http://freshrpms.net/> 1.0-7 - Fix License field, it's actually GPL+ which is okay for GPLv3 gkrellm. jack-audio-connection-kit-0.103.0-4.el5 --------------------------------------- * Tue Sep 04 2007 Andy Shevchenko <andy(a)smile.org.ua> 0.103.0-4 - fix Source Forge's URL scheme libid3tag-0.15.1b-4.el5 ----------------------- * Mon Aug 06 2007 Ville Skyttä <ville.skytta at iki.fi> - 0.15.1b-4 - License: GPLv2+ php-pear-MDB2-Driver-mysql-1.4.1-2.el5 -------------------------------------- * Sat Sep 22 2007 Christopher Stone <chris.stone(a)gmail.com> 1.4.1-2 - Update Requires smart-0.51-49.el5 ----------------- * Sat Sep 22 2007 Ville Skyttä <ville.skytta at iki.fi> - 0.51-49 - 0.51; autofs, ccache, and autotools (partially) patches addressed upstream. * Sat Sep 08 2007 Ville Skyttä <ville.skytta at iki.fi> - 0.50-48 - KSmartTray desktop entry fixes. - License: GPLv2+ trac-bazaar-plugin-0.2-5.20070829bzr182.el5 ------------------------------------------- * Sat Sep 22 2007 Toshio Kuratomi <a.badger(a)gmail.com> - 0.2-5.20070829bzr182 - Patches to fix RSS feed in timeline view. * Wed Aug 29 2007 Toshio Kuratomi <a.badger(a)gmail.com> - 0.2-4.20070829bzr182 - Update license tag to reflect GPLv2+. - New update from upstream that clarifies license and makes setuptools build a correct tarball. * Sun Aug 12 2007 Toshio Kuratomi <a.badger(a)gmail.com> - 0.2-3.20070712bzr180 - Update license tag to reflect GPLv2 only. Changes in Fedora EPEL testing/4: mercurial-0.9.4-8.el4 --------------------- * Sat Sep 22 2007 Neal Becker <ndbecker2(a)gmail.com> - 0.9.4-8 - Just cp contrib tree. - Revert install -O2 * Thu Sep 20 2007 Neal Becker <ndbecker2(a)gmail.com> - 0.9.4-7 - Change setup.py install to -O2 to get bytecompile on EL-4 * Thu Sep 20 2007 Neal Becker <ndbecker2(a)gmail.com> - 0.9.4-6 - Revert last change. * Thu Sep 20 2007 Neal Becker <ndbecker2(a)gmail.com> - 0.9.4-5 - Use %ghost on contrib, otherwise EL-4 build fails For more information about the built packages please see the repository or the Fedora Info Feed: http://fedoraproject.org/infofeed/

1 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

epel-devel September 2007