May 2022 - Epel-packagers-sig - Fedora mailing-lists

[Bug 2088754] New: python-libtmux-0.12.0a0 is available
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 17 Sep '22

17 Sep '22

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2088754 Bug ID: 2088754 Summary: python-libtmux-0.12.0a0 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: python-libtmux Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: mail(a)fabian-affolter.ch Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: dcavalca(a)fb.com, epel-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, mail(a)fabian-affolter.ch Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Latest upstream release: 0.12.0a0 Current version/release in rawhide: 0.11.0-1.fc37 URL: https://pypi.python.org/pypi/libtmux Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/ More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from Anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/13040/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2088754

1 54

[Bug 2078238] New: gssdp-1.5.0 is available
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 17 Sep '22

17 Sep '22

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2078238 Bug ID: 2078238 Summary: gssdp-1.5.0 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: gssdp Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: klember(a)redhat.com Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: dcavalca(a)fb.com, epel-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, klember(a)redhat.com, zeenix(a)redhat.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Latest upstream release: 1.5.0 Current version/release in rawhide: 1.4.0.1-2.fc36 URL: https://developer.gnome.org/gssdp/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/ More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from Anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/1262/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2078238

1 7

[Bug 2044963] New: F36FailsToInstall: postorius
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 13 Sep '22

13 Sep '22

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2044963 Bug ID: 2044963 Summary: F36FailsToInstall: postorius Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: python-postorius Assignee: michel(a)michel-slm.name Reporter: mhroncok(a)redhat.com CC: epel-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, infra-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, michel(a)michel-slm.name, ngompa13(a)gmail.com, python-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Blocks: 1992487 (F36FailsToInstall,RAWHIDEFailsToInstall) Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Hello, Please note that this comment was generated automatically. If you feel that this output has mistakes, please contact me via email (mhroncok(a)redhat.com) Your package (python-postorius) Fails To Install in Fedora 36: can't install postorius: - nothing provides (python3.10dist(django) < 3.3~~ with python3.10dist(django) >= 2.2) needed by postorius-1.3.6-1.fc36.noarch If you know about this problem and are planning on fixing it, please acknowledge so by setting the bug status to ASSIGNED. If you don't have time to maintain this package, consider orphaning it, so maintainers of dependent packages realize the problem. If you don't react accordingly to the policy for FTBFS/FTI bugs (https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails…) your package may be orphaned in 8+ weeks. P.S. The data was generated solely from koji buildroot, so it might be newer than the latest compose or the content on mirrors. P.P.S. If this bug has been reported in the middle of upgrading multiple dependent packages, please consider using side tags: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/#updating-inter-d… Thanks! Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1992487 [Bug 1992487] Fedora 36 Fails To install Tracker -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2044963

1 10

[Bug 2032607] New: F36FailsToInstall: hyperkitty
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 13 Sep '22

13 Sep '22

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2032607 Bug ID: 2032607 Summary: F36FailsToInstall: hyperkitty Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: python-hyperkitty Assignee: michel(a)michel-slm.name Reporter: mhroncok(a)redhat.com CC: epel-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, infra-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, michel(a)michel-slm.name, ngompa13(a)gmail.com, python-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Blocks: 1992487 (F36FailsToInstall,RAWHIDEFailsToInstall) Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Hello, Please note that this comment was generated automatically. If you feel that this output has mistakes, please contact me via email (mhroncok(a)redhat.com) Your package (python-hyperkitty) Fails To Install in Fedora 36: can't install hyperkitty: - nothing provides python3.10dist(flufl-lock) >= 4 needed by hyperkitty-1.3.5-1.fc36.noarch - nothing provides python3.10dist(mistune) >= 2~rc1 needed by hyperkitty-1.3.5-1.fc36.noarch If you know about this problem and are planning on fixing it, please acknowledge so by setting the bug status to ASSIGNED. If you don't have time to maintain this package, consider orphaning it, so maintainers of dependent packages realize the problem. If you don't react accordingly to the policy for FTBFS/FTI bugs (https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails…) your package may be orphaned in 8+ weeks. P.S. The data was generated solely from koji buildroot, so it might be newer than the latest compose or the content on mirrors. P.P.S. If this bug has been reported in the middle of upgrading multiple dependent packages, please consider using side tags: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/#updating-inter-d… Thanks! Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1992487 [Bug 1992487] Fedora 36 Fails To install Tracker -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2032607

1 7

[Bug 2081494] New: CVE-2022-1292 openssl: c_rehash script allows command injection
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 03 Sep '22

03 Sep '22

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2081494 Bug ID: 2081494 Summary: CVE-2022-1292 openssl: c_rehash script allows command injection Product: Security Response Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: vulnerability Keywords: Security Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: security-response-team(a)redhat.com Reporter: pdelbell(a)redhat.com CC: aos-bugs(a)redhat.com, asoldano(a)redhat.com, bbaranow(a)redhat.com, bdettelb(a)redhat.com, berrange(a)redhat.com, bmaxwell(a)redhat.com, bootloader-eng-team(a)redhat.com, brian.stansberry(a)redhat.com, caswilli(a)redhat.com, cdewolf(a)redhat.com, cfergeau(a)redhat.com, chazlett(a)redhat.com, crobinso(a)redhat.com, crypto-team(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, csutherl(a)redhat.com, darran.lofthouse(a)redhat.com, dbelyavs(a)redhat.com, ddepaula(a)redhat.com, dhalasz(a)redhat.com, dkreling(a)redhat.com, dkuc(a)redhat.com, dosoudil(a)redhat.com, dueno(a)redhat.com, elima(a)redhat.com, epel-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, erik-fedora(a)vanpienbroek.nl, f4bug(a)amsat.org, fjansen(a)redhat.com, fjuma(a)redhat.com, fmartine(a)redhat.com, gparvin(a)redhat.com, gzaronik(a)redhat.com, iweiss(a)redhat.com, jburrell(a)redhat.com, jclere(a)redhat.com, jferlan(a)redhat.com, jkoehler(a)redhat.com, jochrist(a)redhat.com, jramanat(a)redhat.com, jwong(a)redhat.com, jwon(a)redhat.com, kaycoth(a)redhat.com, krathod(a)redhat.com, kraxel(a)redhat.com, ktietz(a)redhat.com, lgao(a)redhat.com, marcandre.lureau(a)redhat.com, michal.skrivanek(a)redhat.com, michel(a)michel-slm.name, micjohns(a)redhat.com, mjg59(a)srcf.ucam.org, mosmerov(a)redhat.com, mperina(a)redhat.com, msochure(a)redhat.com, mspacek(a)redhat.com, msvehla(a)redhat.com, mturk(a)redhat.com, njean(a)redhat.com, nwallace(a)redhat.com, pahickey(a)redhat.com, pbonzini(a)redhat.com, pjindal(a)redhat.com, pjones(a)redhat.com, pmackay(a)redhat.com, redhat-bugzilla(a)linuxnetz.de, rfreiman(a)redhat.com, rharwood(a)redhat.com, rh-spice-bugs(a)redhat.com, rjones(a)redhat.com, rstancel(a)redhat.com, rsvoboda(a)redhat.com, sahana(a)redhat.com, sbonazzo(a)redhat.com, smaestri(a)redhat.com, stcannon(a)redhat.com, sthirugn(a)redhat.com, szappis(a)redhat.com, tmeszaro(a)redhat.com, tm(a)t8m.info, tom.jenkinson(a)redhat.com, virt-maint(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, virt-maint(a)redhat.com, vkrizan(a)redhat.com, vkumar(a)redhat.com, vmugicag(a)redhat.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Other The c_rehash script does not properly sanitise shell metacharacters to prevent command injection. This script is distributed by some operating systems in a manner where it is automatically executed. On such operating systems, an attacker could execute arbitrary commands with the privileges of the script. Use of the c_rehash script is considered obsolete and should be replaced by the OpenSSL rehash command line tool. This issue affects OpenSSL versions 1.0.2, 1.1.1 and 3.0. OpenSSL 1.0.2 users should upgrade to 1.0.2ze OpenSSL 1.1.1 users should upgrade to 1.1.1o OpenSSL 3.0 users should upgrade to 3.0.3 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2081494

1 25

[Bug 2069264] New: [abrt] notmuch: notmuch_tags_valid(): notmuch killed by SIGSEGV
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 29 Aug '22

29 Aug '22

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2069264 Bug ID: 2069264 Summary: [abrt] notmuch: notmuch_tags_valid(): notmuch killed by SIGSEGV Product: Fedora Version: 35 Hardware: x86_64 Status: NEW Whiteboard: abrt_hash:984ab0912b2464ac1bdc7a4ed0314cd31128b91d;VAR IANT_ID=xfce; Component: notmuch Assignee: mjg(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: jhutar(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: epel-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, lewk(a)openmailbox.org, mjg(a)fedoraproject.org, rbean(a)redhat.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Description of problem: Some email have to be causing that :-/ neomutt is failing because of that as well when I have virtual-mailboxes configuerd. Command I have used in this case was: notmuch search "tag:zsdidaktis OR from:@zsdidaktis.cz" Version-Release number of selected component: notmuch-0.35-2.fc35 Additional info: reporter: libreport-2.15.2 backtrace_rating: 4 cgroup: 0::/user.slice/user-1000.slice/session-2.scope cmdline: notmuch search $'tag:zsdidaktis OR from:@zsdidaktis.cz' crash_function: notmuch_tags_valid executable: /usr/bin/notmuch journald_cursor: s=2b2e17a38b1e4b81b5a9d1b5dc73c207;i=4a10;b=b9117c89319c46bfb4da24d1af361aae;m=36b1505a0a;t=5db48d2887322;x=3e305f1fd4ce2258 kernel: 5.16.15-201.fc35.x86_64 rootdir: / runlevel: N 5 type: CCpp uid: 1000 Truncated backtrace: Thread no. 1 (6 frames) #0 notmuch_tags_valid at lib/tags.c:51 #1 _thread_add_message at lib/thread.cc:254 #2 _notmuch_thread_create at lib/thread.cc:631 #3 notmuch_threads_get at lib/query.cc:671 #4 do_search_threads at /usr/src/debug/notmuch-0.35-2.fc35.x86_64/notmuch-search.c:150 #5 notmuch_search_command at /usr/src/debug/notmuch-0.35-2.fc35.x86_64/notmuch-search.c:845 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2069264

1 7

[Bug 2049668] New: libimagequant-4.0.0 is available
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 25 Aug '22

25 Aug '22

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2049668 Bug ID: 2049668 Summary: libimagequant-4.0.0 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: libimagequant Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: manisandro(a)gmail.com Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: epel-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, infra-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, manisandro(a)gmail.com, python-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, sergio(a)serjux.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Latest upstream release: 4.0.0 Current version/release in rawhide: 2.17.0-2.fc36 URL: https://pngquant.org/lib/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/ More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from Anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/12768/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2049668

1 11

[Bug 2072386] New: Remove xmlstarlet from epel8
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 24 Aug '22

24 Aug '22

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2072386 Bug ID: 2072386 Summary: Remove xmlstarlet from epel8 Product: Fedora EPEL Version: epel8 Status: NEW Component: xmlstarlet Assignee: stickster(a)gmail.com Reporter: rhel-process-autobot(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: daltonminer(a)gmail.com, dcavalca(a)fb.com, epel-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, michel(a)michel-slm.name, ngompa13(a)gmail.com, stickster(a)gmail.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2072386

1 5

[Bug 2084488] New: Remove xmlstarlet from epel9
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 24 Aug '22

24 Aug '22

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2084488 Bug ID: 2084488 Summary: Remove xmlstarlet from epel9 Product: Fedora EPEL Version: epel9 Status: NEW Component: xmlstarlet Assignee: stickster(a)gmail.com Reporter: rhel-process-autobot(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: daltonminer(a)gmail.com, dcavalca(a)fb.com, epel-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, michel(a)michel-slm.name, ngompa13(a)gmail.com, stickster(a)gmail.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2084488

1 4

[Bug 2079295] New: Busybox requires ld-musl-x86_64.so.1, but must be static
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 16 Aug '22

16 Aug '22

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2079295 Bug ID: 2079295 Summary: Busybox requires ld-musl-x86_64.so.1, but must be static Product: Fedora Version: rawhide OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: busybox Severity: medium Assignee: spotrh(a)gmail.com Reporter: atu(a)nmetau.edu.ua QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: admiller(a)redhat.com, dcavalca(a)fb.com, dvlasenk(a)redhat.com, epel-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, spotrh(a)gmail.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Description of problem: Busybox is a special binary, which must be static. However, it requires so from musl library. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): busybox-1:1.35.0-4.fc37.x86_64 How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. rpm -Uvh --test busybox-1.35.0-4.fc37.x86_64.rpm Actual results: error: Failed dependencies: ld-musl-x86_64.so.1()(64bit) is needed by busybox-1:1.35.0-4.fc37.x86_64 Expected results: Clean install without dependencies from any library. Additional info: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2079295

1 1

2024

2023

2022

2021

Epel-packagers-sig May 2022