September 2022 - Epel-packagers-sig

[Bug 2126424] New: CVE-2022-39170 libdwarf: double free in _dwarf_exec_frame_instr() in dwarf_frame.c
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 17 Sep '22

17 Sep '22

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2126424 Bug ID: 2126424 Summary: CVE-2022-39170 libdwarf: double free in _dwarf_exec_frame_instr() in dwarf_frame.c Product: Security Response Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: vulnerability Keywords: Security Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: security-response-team(a)redhat.com Reporter: trathi(a)redhat.com CC: epel-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, jitesh.1337(a)gmail.com, michel(a)michel-slm.name, orion(a)nwra.com, tom(a)compton.nu Target Milestone: --- Classification: Other libdwarf 0.4.1 has a double free in _dwarf_exec_frame_instr in dwarf_frame.c. https://github.com/davea42/libdwarf-code/commit/60303eb80ecc7747bf29776d545… https://github.com/davea42/libdwarf-code/issues/132 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2126424

1 6

[Bug 2126426] New: CVE-2022-39170 libdwarf: double free in _dwarf_exec_frame_instr() in dwarf_frame.c [fedora-all]
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 17 Sep '22

17 Sep '22

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2126426 Bug ID: 2126426 Summary: CVE-2022-39170 libdwarf: double free in _dwarf_exec_frame_instr() in dwarf_frame.c [fedora-all] Product: Fedora Version: 36 Status: NEW Component: libdwarf Keywords: Security, SecurityTracking Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: tom(a)compton.nu Reporter: trathi(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: epel-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, jitesh.1337(a)gmail.com, michel(a)michel-slm.name, orion(a)nwra.com, tom(a)compton.nu Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora This is an automatically created tracking bug! It was created to ensure that one or more security vulnerabilities are fixed in affected versions of fedora-all. For comments that are specific to the vulnerability please use bugs filed against the "Security Response" product referenced in the "Blocks" field. For more information see: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Security/TrackingBugs When submitting as an update, use the fedpkg template provided in the next comment(s). This will include the bug IDs of this tracking bug as well as the relevant top-level CVE bugs. Please also mention the CVE IDs being fixed in the RPM changelog and the fedpkg commit message. NOTE: this issue affects multiple supported versions of Fedora. While only one tracking bug has been filed, please correct all affected versions at the same time. If you need to fix the versions independent of each other, you may clone this bug as appropriate. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2126426

1 5

[Bug 2126826] New: CVE-2022-3213 ImageMagick: heap buffer overflow while processing a malformed TIFF file [epel-all]
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 17 Sep '22

17 Sep '22

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2126826 Bug ID: 2126826 Summary: CVE-2022-3213 ImageMagick: heap buffer overflow while processing a malformed TIFF file [epel-all] Product: Fedora EPEL Version: epel8 Status: NEW Component: ImageMagick Keywords: Security, SecurityTracking Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: luya_tfz(a)thefinalzone.net Reporter: trathi(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: blaise(a)gmail.com, dcavalca(a)fb.com, epel-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, fedora(a)famillecollet.com, luya_tfz(a)thefinalzone.net, michel(a)michel-slm.name, ngompa13(a)gmail.com, pampelmuse(a)gmx.at, sergio(a)serjux.com, troy(a)troycurtisjr.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora This is an automatically created tracking bug! It was created to ensure that one or more security vulnerabilities are fixed in affected versions of epel-all. For comments that are specific to the vulnerability please use bugs filed against the "Security Response" product referenced in the "Blocks" field. For more information see: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Security/TrackingBugs When submitting as an update, use the fedpkg template provided in the next comment(s). This will include the bug IDs of this tracking bug as well as the relevant top-level CVE bugs. Please also mention the CVE IDs being fixed in the RPM changelog and the fedpkg commit message. NOTE: this issue affects multiple supported versions of Fedora EPEL. While only one tracking bug has been filed, please correct all affected versions at the same time. If you need to fix the versions independent of each other, you may clone this bug as appropriate. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2126826

1 4

[Bug 2116541] New: CVE-2022-2719 ImageMagick: Assertion Failure could lead to DoS due to attempted writing of NULL image list [epel-all]
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 17 Sep '22

17 Sep '22

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2116541 Bug ID: 2116541 Summary: CVE-2022-2719 ImageMagick: Assertion Failure could lead to DoS due to attempted writing of NULL image list [epel-all] Product: Fedora EPEL Version: epel8 Status: NEW Component: ImageMagick Keywords: Security, SecurityTracking Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: luya_tfz(a)thefinalzone.net Reporter: tcullum(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: blaise(a)gmail.com, dcavalca(a)fb.com, epel-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, fedora(a)famillecollet.com, luya_tfz(a)thefinalzone.net, michel(a)michel-slm.name, ngompa13(a)gmail.com, pampelmuse(a)gmx.at, sergio(a)serjux.com, troy(a)troycurtisjr.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora This is an automatically created tracking bug! It was created to ensure that one or more security vulnerabilities are fixed in affected versions of epel-all. For comments that are specific to the vulnerability please use bugs filed against the "Security Response" product referenced in the "Blocks" field. For more information see: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Security/TrackingBugs When submitting as an update, use the fedpkg template provided in the next comment(s). This will include the bug IDs of this tracking bug as well as the relevant top-level CVE bugs. Please also mention the CVE IDs being fixed in the RPM changelog and the fedpkg commit message. NOTE: this issue affects multiple supported versions of Fedora EPEL. While only one tracking bug has been filed, please correct all affected versions at the same time. If you need to fix the versions independent of each other, you may clone this bug as appropriate. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2116541

1 4

[Bug 2124630] New: Please include multi-threading in squashfuse_ll
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 17 Sep '22

17 Sep '22

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124630 Bug ID: 2124630 Summary: Please include multi-threading in squashfuse_ll Product: Fedora EPEL Version: epel7 Status: NEW Component: squashfuse Assignee: kyrofa(a)ubuntu.com Reporter: dwd(a)fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: epel-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, kyrofa(a)ubuntu.com, michel(a)michel-slm.name Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Description of problem: The performance of squashfuse turns out to be very awful for multi-core applications. Please see for details: https://github.com/apptainer/apptainer/issues/665 We are about to release a version of apptainer (which I maintain in EPEL and Fedora) that puts a heavy dependence on squashfuse. The performance of the upstream squashfuse_ll multithreading patch at https://github.com/vasi/squashfuse/pull/70 makes a huge difference, so much so that we have decided to for now include a patched version of squashfuse_ll in the apptainer distribution. We would much prefer of course if it would come directly from the EPEL/Fedora version of the squashfuse package. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 0.1.102 How reproducible: Very Steps to Reproduce: Please see the above issue for details. Actual results: With the detailed benchmark on a 16 core el7 node, reading from a local disk takes 6:23, epel squashfuse by itself takes 41:11, and epel squashfuse_ll takes 13:06. Expected results: I expect results much more comparable to local disk, and in fact with the multithreaded patch the benchmark time goes down to 6:35, nearly the local disk time. Additional info: Would you consider upgrading to squashfuse 0.1.105, including the multithreaded patch, and compiling it with `--enable-multithreading`? The upstream provider does not seem to be in any hurry to include the patch; he hasn't even commented on the thread which has been available for several months. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124630

1 7

[Bug 2088754] New: python-libtmux-0.12.0a0 is available
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 17 Sep '22

17 Sep '22

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2088754 Bug ID: 2088754 Summary: python-libtmux-0.12.0a0 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: python-libtmux Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: mail(a)fabian-affolter.ch Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: dcavalca(a)fb.com, epel-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, mail(a)fabian-affolter.ch Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Latest upstream release: 0.12.0a0 Current version/release in rawhide: 0.11.0-1.fc37 URL: https://pypi.python.org/pypi/libtmux Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/ More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from Anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/13040/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2088754

1 54

[Bug 2078238] New: gssdp-1.5.0 is available
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 17 Sep '22

17 Sep '22

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2078238 Bug ID: 2078238 Summary: gssdp-1.5.0 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: gssdp Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: klember(a)redhat.com Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: dcavalca(a)fb.com, epel-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, klember(a)redhat.com, zeenix(a)redhat.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Latest upstream release: 1.5.0 Current version/release in rawhide: 1.4.0.1-2.fc36 URL: https://developer.gnome.org/gssdp/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/ More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from Anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/1262/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2078238

1 7

[Bug 2118163] New: F37FailsToInstall: mkdocs
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 17 Sep '22

17 Sep '22

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2118163 Bug ID: 2118163 Summary: F37FailsToInstall: mkdocs Product: Fedora Version: 37 Status: NEW Component: mkdocs Assignee: manisandro(a)gmail.com Reporter: mhroncok(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: epel-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, manisandro(a)gmail.com, rcallicotte(a)mailbox.org, williamjmorenor(a)gmail.com Blocks: 2045109 (F37FailsToInstall) Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Hello, Please note that this comment was generated automatically. If you feel that this output has mistakes, please contact me via email (mhroncok(a)redhat.com) Your package (mkdocs) Fails To Install in Fedora 37: can't install mkdocs: - nothing provides (python3.11dist(markdown) < 3.4~~ with python3.11dist(markdown) >= 3.2.1) needed by mkdocs-1.3.1-2.fc37.noarch If you know about this problem and are planning on fixing it, please acknowledge so by setting the bug status to ASSIGNED. If you don't have time to maintain this package, consider orphaning it, so maintainers of dependent packages realize the problem. If you don't react accordingly to the policy for FTBFS/FTI bugs (https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails…) your package may be orphaned in 8+ weeks. P.S. The data was generated solely from koji buildroot, so it might be newer than the latest compose or the content on mirrors. To reproduce, use the koji/local repo only, e.g. in mock: $ mock -r fedora-37-x86_64 --config-opts mirrored=False install mkdocs P.P.S. If this bug has been reported in the middle of upgrading multiple dependent packages, please consider using side tags: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/#updating-inter-d… Thanks! Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2045109 [Bug 2045109] Fedora 37 Fails To install Tracker -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2118163

1 5

[Bug 2118159] New: F38FailsToInstall: mkdocs
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 17 Sep '22

17 Sep '22

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2118159 Bug ID: 2118159 Summary: F38FailsToInstall: mkdocs Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: mkdocs Assignee: manisandro(a)gmail.com Reporter: mhroncok(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: epel-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, manisandro(a)gmail.com, rcallicotte(a)mailbox.org, williamjmorenor(a)gmail.com Blocks: 2117177 (F38FailsToInstall,RAWHIDEFailsToInstall) Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Hello, Please note that this comment was generated automatically. If you feel that this output has mistakes, please contact me via email (mhroncok(a)redhat.com) Your package (mkdocs) Fails To Install in Fedora 38: can't install mkdocs: - nothing provides (python3.11dist(markdown) < 3.4~~ with python3.11dist(markdown) >= 3.2.1) needed by mkdocs-1.3.1-2.fc37.noarch If you know about this problem and are planning on fixing it, please acknowledge so by setting the bug status to ASSIGNED. If you don't have time to maintain this package, consider orphaning it, so maintainers of dependent packages realize the problem. If you don't react accordingly to the policy for FTBFS/FTI bugs (https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails…) your package may be orphaned in 8+ weeks. P.S. The data was generated solely from koji buildroot, so it might be newer than the latest compose or the content on mirrors. To reproduce, use the koji/local repo only, e.g. in mock: $ mock -r fedora-38-x86_64 --config-opts mirrored=False install mkdocs P.P.S. If this bug has been reported in the middle of upgrading multiple dependent packages, please consider using side tags: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/#updating-inter-d… Thanks! Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2117177 [Bug 2117177] Fedora 38 Fails To install Tracker -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2118159

1 12

[Bug 2124370] request epel 9 branch for glpk
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 17 Sep '22

17 Sep '22

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124370 Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |MODIFIED --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> --- FEDORA-EPEL-2022-6fec4c6e57 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 9. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-6fec4c6e57 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124370

1 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

Epel-packagers-sig September 2022