golang May 2019

golang@lists.fedoraproject.org

7 participants
27 discussions

[go-rpm-macros] Issue #4: Issues building golang source package on EL7
by Gary Mann 15 Jun '19

15 Jun '19

mooz reported a new issue against the project: `go-rpm-macros` that you are following: `` I'm trying to build a golang package for EL7 but I'm unable to create a SRPM from a spec file after installing the go RPM macros. I'm receiving the below error: ``` rpmbuild -bs golang-github-jedisct1-clocksmith.spec error: Bad file: /home/test/rpmbuild/SOURCES/%{archivename}.%{archiveext}: No such file or directory RPM build errors: Bad file: /home/test/rpmbuild/SOURCES/%{archivename}.%{archiveext}: No such file or directory ``` I thought maybe the issue was caused by the macros.forge file not being included in the latest EL7 build of redhat-rpm-config (as mentioned at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/More_Go_packaging#Testing_the_proposal) but trying to copy the file over from a later Fedora release didn't change the behavior. Not too familiar with the entire process on Go packaging, is there something I'm missing? `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/go-rpm-macros/issue/4

2 8

[go-rpm-macros] Issue #3: %goprep should apply patches automatically
by Nicolas Mailhot 14 Jun '19

14 Jun '19

nim reported a new issue against the project: `go-rpm-macros` that you are following: `` `%goprep` should apply patches automatically, so there is no convenience gap with `%autosetup`. This is generic work that should be done *redhat-rpm-config* side in forge macros and then reused in`%goprep`. Basically: 1. define a `patch_flags<suffix>` rpm variable holding the parameters that should be passed to `%patch<suffix>` 2. define a `default_flags<suffix>` fallback 3. define a `source_patches<suffix>` holding an ordered space separated list of patch suffixes associated with a particular forge/go source. And then write the usual lua loops to apply it all at the right moment in the spec. `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/go-rpm-macros/issue/3

4 6

[go-rpm-macros] Issue #7: %goinstall should verify explicit paths exist
by Elliott Sales de Andrade 14 Jun '19

14 Jun '19

qulogic reported a new issue against the project: `go-rpm-macros` that you are following: `` In the old version of [golang-github-pkg-errors](https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/golang-github-…, there was a typo, and `glide.yaml` was listed twice in the sources. This meant that `glide.lock` was never copied to the source directory. When `%goinstall glide.yaml glide.lock` was called later, it created a `glide.lock` _directory_. Now that I'm trying to fix it, it causes [an upgrade error](https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-f01a015bb7#comme… since rpm can't handle a directory->file change. So now I need to go throw in a scriptlet to fix the directory. `%goinstall` should not accept an explicit path argument that does not exist, and should fail the build. If it really needs to be able to create arbitrary directories like that, it should be behind an explicit flag (like `install -d` is). `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/go-rpm-macros/issue/7

2 5

[go-rpm-macros] Issue #1: -devel subpackage builds differently on different arches
by Nicolas Mailhot 14 Jun '19

14 Jun '19

nim reported a new issue against the project: `go-rpm-macros` that you are following: `` This is a clone of https://github.com/gofed/go-macros/issues/56 The problem is actually in golist, not in the macros themselves. Sticking it in the macro project for now as they need to be switched to deploy in libdir if this is not fixed According to @jcajka this needs fixing in any case, because other build options are handled the same way by the Go compiler, so deploying only the files corresponding to a particular set of options means sources can not be used with another one later. And we have some of those in Fedora, for example, optional selinux support in some container projects. `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/go-rpm-macros/issue/1

1 3

[go-rpm-macros] Issue #2: EPEL availability
by Nicolas Mailhot 14 Jun '19

14 Jun '19

nim reported a new issue against the project: `go-rpm-macros` that you are following: `` The macro code needs massaging to also work on EPEL. Most of the work is spec side since some of the macros are going to collide with the ones provided by previous iterations of Go macro packages `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/go-rpm-macros/issue/2

1 2

[go-rpm-macros] Issue #6: golist needs to be run outside the source tree to avoid panics
by Nicolas Mailhot 14 Jun '19

14 Jun '19

nim reported a new issue against the project: `go-rpm-macros` that you are following: `` To workaround https://pagure.io/golist/issue/7, the shell wrapper should switch to another directory (for example /usr/bin) before running `golist`, and switch back to the correct dir afterwards (so add strategic pushds popds to keep track of where the user, golist and the tests want to be) `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/go-rpm-macros/issue/6

2 4

[go-rpm-macros] PR #14: make use of golist --with-tests in dynamic buildrequires
by Nicolas Mailhot 28 May '19

28 May '19

nim opened a new pull-request against the project: `go-rpm-macros` that you are following: `` make use of golist --with-tests in dynamic buildrequires `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/go-rpm-macros/pull-request/14

1 1

ANN: golist 0.10.0
by Elliott Sales de Andrade 27 May '19

27 May '19

Hi, I just tagged golist 0.10.0 a little while back [1]. It fixes various bugs and RFEs that were needed to finish implementing the Go macros. I've also opened a Review Request for golang-pagure-golist [2], though it will need some coordination with the original /usr/bin/golist-providing package (go-compilers-golang-compiler) to ensure no conflicts. [1] https://pagure.io/golist/releases [2] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1714090 -- Elliott

1 0

[golist] Issue #7: runtime panic, nil dereference when running %gochecks
by Nicolas Mailhot 27 May '19

27 May '19

nim reported a new issue against the project: `golist` that you are following: `` Issue migrated from https://github.com/gofed/symbols-extractor/issues/157 This is from the mock build log: ```sh + go-rpm-integration check -i github.com/syncthing/notify -p /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/golang-github-syncthing-notify-0-0.5.20181011git116c45b.fc30.x86_64 -g /usr/share/gocode -b /builddir/build/BUILD/notify-116c45bb5ad48777321e4984d1320d56889b6097/_build -r '.*example.*' Testing: github.com/syncthing/notify panic: runtime error: invalid memory address or nil pointer dereference [recovered] panic: runtime error: invalid memory address or nil pointer dereference [signal SIGSEGV: segmentation violation code=0x1 addr=0x0 pc=0x5ad9fd] goroutine 1 [running]: github.com/gofed/symbols-extractor/vendor/github.com/urfave/cli.HandleActio… /builddir/build/BUILD/symbols-extractor-9f4330a0f4437ca61ba92f9f30e34424c6742ad6/src/github.com/gofed/symbols-extractor/vendor/github.com/urfave/cli/app.go:472 +0x278 panic(0x920cc0, 0xd79220) /usr/lib/golang/src/runtime/panic.go:513 +0x1b9 github.com/gofed/symbols-extractor/pkg/util/internal/load.ImportPaths(0xc00…, 0x1, 0x1, 0x0, 0x1, 0xc0001450c8) /builddir/build/BUILD/symbols-extractor-9f4330a0f4437ca61ba92f9f30e34424c6742ad6/src/github.com/gofed/symbols-extractor/pkg/util/internal/load/pkg.go:1888 +0x5d github.com/gofed/symbols-extractor/pkg/util/internal/load.PackagesAndErrors…, 0x1, 0x1, 0xa3c700, 0xc0002a7480, 0x1c) /builddir/build/BUILD/symbols-extractor-9f4330a0f4437ca61ba92f9f30e34424c6742ad6/src/github.com/gofed/symbols-extractor/pkg/util/internal/load/pkg.go:1842 +0xa3 github.com/gofed/symbols-extractor/pkg/util.ListPackage(0xc0002d22f1, 0x1b, 0x1b, 0x0, 0xc000145290) /builddir/build/BUILD/symbols-extractor-9f4330a0f4437ca61ba92f9f30e34424c6742ad6/src/github.com/gofed/symbols-extractor/pkg/util/util.go:420 +0x8f github.com/gofed/symbols-extractor/pkg/util.(*PackageInfoCollector).Collect…, 0x6d, 0xa3e6a0, 0xc0002bcc30, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0xc000145328) /builddir/build/BUILD/symbols-extractor-9f4330a0f4437ca61ba92f9f30e34424c6742ad6/src/github.com/gofed/symbols-extractor/pkg/util/util.go:181 +0x6e8 path/filepath.walk(0xc0002d22a0, 0x6d, 0xa3e6a0, 0xc0002bcc30, 0xc0002a7460, 0x0, 0x2) /usr/lib/golang/src/path/filepath/path.go:362 +0xf6 path/filepath.Walk(0xc0002d22a0, 0x6d, 0xc0002a7460, 0x9a32e6, 0x1) /usr/lib/golang/src/path/filepath/path.go:404 +0x105 github.com/gofed/symbols-extractor/pkg/util.(*PackageInfoCollector).Collect…, 0x7ffc9eabf894, 0x1b, 0x7ffc9eabf894, 0x1b) /builddir/build/BUILD/symbols-extractor-9f4330a0f4437ca61ba92f9f30e34424c6742ad6/src/github.com/gofed/symbols-extractor/pkg/util/util.go:139 +0x158 main.main.func1(0xc0002b7a40, 0x0, 0x0) /builddir/build/BUILD/symbols-extractor-9f4330a0f4437ca61ba92f9f30e34424c6742ad6/src/github.com/gofed/symbols-extractor/cmd/golist/golist.go:73 +0x5d2 reflect.Value.call(0x905580, 0x9c8240, 0x13, 0x9a3ba5, 0x4, 0xc0001459d0, 0x1, 0x1, 0xc0000cc200, 0x8a7ade, ...) /usr/lib/golang/src/reflect/value.go:447 +0x449 reflect.Value.Call(0x905580, 0x9c8240, 0x13, 0xc0001459d0, 0x1, 0x1, 0x1, 0x9a32d8, 0x1) /usr/lib/golang/src/reflect/value.go:308 +0xa4 github.com/gofed/symbols-extractor/vendor/github.com/urfave/cli.HandleActio…, 0x9c8240, 0xc0002b7a40, 0x0, 0x0) /builddir/build/BUILD/symbols-extractor-9f4330a0f4437ca61ba92f9f30e34424c6742ad6/src/github.com/gofed/symbols-extractor/vendor/github.com/urfave/cli/app.go:481 +0x1fb github.com/gofed/symbols-extractor/vendor/github.com/urfave/cli.(*App).Run(…, 0xc0000ce000, 0x7, 0x7, 0x0, 0x0) /builddir/build/BUILD/symbols-extractor-9f4330a0f4437ca61ba92f9f30e34424c6742ad6/src/github.com/gofed/symbols-extractor/vendor/github.com/urfave/cli/app.go:240 +0x47f main.main() /builddir/build/BUILD/symbols-extractor-9f4330a0f4437ca61ba92f9f30e34424c6742ad6/src/github.com/gofed/symbols-extractor/cmd/golist/golist.go:125 +0x791 ``` Since this crash doesn't impact the package build itself, I'm going to ignore it. But it looks like this should be fixed ... Here's a link to the affected koji build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=30252400 The traceback can be seen in the %check section of the build.log. `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/golist/issue/7

4 16

[golist] PR #19: Initialize load.Mod* variables in ListPackage...
by Robert-André Mauchin 27 May '19

27 May '19

eclipseo opened a new pull-request against the project: `golist` that you are following: `` Initialize load.Mod* variables in ListPackage... `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/golist/pull-request/19

2 2

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

golang May 2019