Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: gtk2hs should be renamed ghc-gtk2hs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468314
Summary: gtk2hs should be renamed ghc-gtk2hs
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Component: gtk2hs
AssignedTo: petersen(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: petersen(a)redhat.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: petersen(a)redhat.com, bos(a)serpentine.com,
fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com
Blocks: 446451
Classification: Fedora
Description of problem:
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
How reproducible:
Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
Actual results:
Expected results:
Additional info:
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250767
Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Severity|high |medium
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=425882
Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #27 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> 2008-10-27 20:46:39 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #20)
> Is there no kind of runtime/-devel split of these packages?
Current releases of ghc do not support shared libraries on Linux (though this
may change in come releases).
> I'm not sure I'd know how to find a test suite if one were included, so I can't really check that.
I don't think there is one included in the package.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=425882
--- Comment #26 from Bryan O'Sullivan <bos(a)serpentine.com> 2008-10-27 18:27:01 EDT ---
Re comment #20:
> If you build a package against ghc-zlib, will it be required at runtime?
No. These Haskell packages are essentially devel packages.
> There's no reason to include the LICENSE file twice, is there?
No. If that's happening, it's a mistake.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=425882
--- Comment #25 from Jason Tibbitts <tibbs(a)math.uh.edu> 2008-10-27 11:07:45 EDT ---
Honestly as an FPC member I'm quite interested in actually seeing how the
guidelines work for someone who is not familiar with Haskell. Besides, at this
point it seems as if you are submitting the package, which would mean that it
is quite inappropriate for you to be reviewing it as well.
Before progressing, though, the remaining questions in comment #20 need
answers.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451877
Bill Nottingham <notting(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |notting(a)redhat.com
--- Comment #6 from Bill Nottingham <notting(a)redhat.com> 2008-10-24 16:08:23 EDT ---
Can Haskell users verify this and close the bug if it's fixed?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=425882
--- Comment #24 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> 2008-10-23 03:54:43 EDT ---
Created an attachment (id=321249)
--> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=321249)
ghc-zlib.spec-1.patch
A bit of cleanup/simplification and make it build with ghc-6.8.3 in current
rawhide
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=425882
Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |tibbs(a)math.uh.edu
AssignedTo|nobody(a)fedoraproject.org |tibbs(a)math.uh.edu
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=425882
--- Comment #23 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> 2008-10-23 03:51:02 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #21)
> I just pushed ghc-6.8.3-9.fc10 to koji
Please ghc-6.8.3-10.fc10 with a fixed %cabal_configure for ghc-6.8.3.
(In reply to comment #22)
> Erm, did you mean to to set this back to NEW and assign it back to nobody?
Oops, sorry - no I didn't - I guess I already had the bug open in my browser.
Jason, I didn't mean to steal the review from you, but I was planning on taking
it since I am familiar with Haskell packaging and since no package review has
yet been through the new haskell guidelines I might be better placed to do this
one? But if you want to take it I won't stand in your way. :)
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=425882
--- Comment #22 from Jason Tibbitts <tibbs(a)math.uh.edu> 2008-10-22 23:21:29 EDT ---
Erm, did you mean to to set this back to NEW and assign it back to nobody?
Actually, I didn't even think you could set a ticket back to NEW after its been
assigned; at least, the web interface won't let you. I wonder how that
happened.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.