haskell-devel October 2008

haskell-devel@lists.stg.fedoraproject.org

4 participants
36 discussions

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 468314] New: gtk2hs should be renamed ghc-gtk2hs
by Red Hat Bugzilla 09 Nov '08

09 Nov '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: gtk2hs should be renamed ghc-gtk2hs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468314 Summary: gtk2hs should be renamed ghc-gtk2hs Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: gtk2hs AssignedTo: petersen(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: petersen(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: petersen(a)redhat.com, bos(a)serpentine.com, fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com Blocks: 446451 Classification: Fedora Description of problem: Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: Expected results: Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 1

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 250767] ghc-gtk2hs won't install with only 256MB RAM
by Red Hat Bugzilla 28 Oct '08

28 Oct '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250767 Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|high |medium -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 425882] Review Request: ghc-zlib - zlib bindings for ghc
by Red Hat Bugzilla 27 Oct '08

27 Oct '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=425882 Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #27 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> 2008-10-27 20:46:39 EDT --- (In reply to comment #20) > Is there no kind of runtime/-devel split of these packages? Current releases of ghc do not support shared libraries on Linux (though this may change in come releases). > I'm not sure I'd know how to find a test suite if one were included, so I can't really check that. I don't think there is one included in the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 425882] Review Request: ghc-zlib - zlib bindings for ghc
by Red Hat Bugzilla 27 Oct '08

27 Oct '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=425882 --- Comment #26 from Bryan O'Sullivan <bos(a)serpentine.com> 2008-10-27 18:27:01 EDT --- Re comment #20: > If you build a package against ghc-zlib, will it be required at runtime? No. These Haskell packages are essentially devel packages. > There's no reason to include the LICENSE file twice, is there? No. If that's happening, it's a mistake. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 425882] Review Request: ghc-zlib - zlib bindings for ghc
by Red Hat Bugzilla 27 Oct '08

27 Oct '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=425882 --- Comment #25 from Jason Tibbitts <tibbs(a)math.uh.edu> 2008-10-27 11:07:45 EDT --- Honestly as an FPC member I'm quite interested in actually seeing how the guidelines work for someone who is not familiar with Haskell. Besides, at this point it seems as if you are submitting the package, which would mean that it is quite inappropriate for you to be reviewing it as well. Before progressing, though, the remaining questions in comment #20 need answers. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 451877] unconfined_execmem_exec_t needed for several GHC-built Haskell binaries
by Red Hat Bugzilla 24 Oct '08

24 Oct '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451877 Bill Nottingham <notting(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |notting(a)redhat.com --- Comment #6 from Bill Nottingham <notting(a)redhat.com> 2008-10-24 16:08:23 EDT --- Can Haskell users verify this and close the bug if it's fixed? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 425882] Review Request: ghc-zlib - zlib bindings for ghc
by Red Hat Bugzilla 23 Oct '08

23 Oct '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=425882 --- Comment #24 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> 2008-10-23 03:54:43 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=321249) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=321249) ghc-zlib.spec-1.patch A bit of cleanup/simplification and make it build with ghc-6.8.3 in current rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 425882] Review Request: ghc-zlib - zlib bindings for ghc
by Red Hat Bugzilla 23 Oct '08

23 Oct '08

1 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 425882] Review Request: ghc-zlib - zlib bindings for ghc
by Red Hat Bugzilla 23 Oct '08

23 Oct '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=425882 --- Comment #23 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> 2008-10-23 03:51:02 EDT --- (In reply to comment #21) > I just pushed ghc-6.8.3-9.fc10 to koji Please ghc-6.8.3-10.fc10 with a fixed %cabal_configure for ghc-6.8.3. (In reply to comment #22) > Erm, did you mean to to set this back to NEW and assign it back to nobody? Oops, sorry - no I didn't - I guess I already had the bug open in my browser. Jason, I didn't mean to steal the review from you, but I was planning on taking it since I am familiar with Haskell packaging and since no package review has yet been through the new haskell guidelines I might be better placed to do this one? But if you want to take it I won't stand in your way. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 425882] Review Request: ghc-zlib - zlib bindings for ghc
by Red Hat Bugzilla 22 Oct '08

22 Oct '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=425882 --- Comment #22 from Jason Tibbitts <tibbs(a)math.uh.edu> 2008-10-22 23:21:29 EDT --- Erm, did you mean to to set this back to NEW and assign it back to nobody? Actually, I didn't even think you could set a ticket back to NEW after its been assigned; at least, the web interface won't let you. I wonder how that happened. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

haskell-devel October 2008