haskell-devel July 2008

haskell-devel@lists.stg.fedoraproject.org

4 participants
22 discussions

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 250767] ghc-gtk2hs won't install with only 256MB RAM
by Red Hat Bugzilla 16 Jul '08

16 Jul '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: ghc-gtk2hs won't install with only 256MB RAM https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250767 petersen(a)redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|ghc-gtk2hs won't install |ghc-gtk2hs won't install |with 256 MB RAM |with only 256MB RAM -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 250767] ghc-gtk2hs won't install with 256 MB RAM
by Red Hat Bugzilla 16 Jul '08

16 Jul '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: ghc-gtk2hs won't install with 256 MB RAM https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250767 petersen(a)redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|RPMs for ghc-gtk2hs, ghc661-|ghc-gtk2hs won't install |gtk2hs, won't install with |with 256 MB RAM |256 MB RAM | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 250767] RPMs for ghc-gtk2hs, ghc661-gtk2hs, won't install with 256 MB RAM
by Red Hat Bugzilla 16 Jul '08

16 Jul '08

1 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 250767] RPMs for ghc-gtk2hs, ghc661-gtk2hs, won't install with 256 MB RAM
by Red Hat Bugzilla 15 Jul '08

15 Jul '08

1 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 250767] RPMs for ghc-gtk2hs, ghc661-gtk2hs, won't install with 256 MB RAM
by Red Hat Bugzilla 15 Jul '08

15 Jul '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: RPMs for ghc-gtk2hs, ghc661-gtk2hs, won't install with 256 MB RAM https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250767 ------- Additional Comments From gdweber(a)indiana.edu 2008-07-15 12:25 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > Shared library support should arrive in 6.10, so I propose to do nothing about > this for another few months :-) I guess that's fine. I'd like to report an update on the situation, and to emphasize something in my earlier report. ****** The point I would like to emphasize is that building and installing from source finishes in a reasonable amount of time, but installing from rpm (yum) does not. Does that not suggest that something bizarre is happening in the rpm install that does not happen in the install from source? And since installing from source certainly generates the .o files, does that not cast some doubt on the theory that, when the rpm generates the .o files at install time, that's really the problem? I realize that 256 MB RAM seems small to you guys, but it's all I've got -- and it's adequate for most things, including building and installing gtk2hs from source, so why would it not be adequate for the rpm install? ****** Here's my update: I've moved to a faster computer, but still with 256 MB RAM. Installed Fedora 9. Tried to install ghc-gtk2hs, with the same results as I reported before. Downloaded the source tarball for gtk2hs 0.9.13 from http://haskell.org/gtk2hs/download/ # ./configure --prefix=/opt --enable-cairo --enable-svg \ --enable-opengl (Note, --enable-docs not included because that led to an installation failure -- incompatible version of haddock, I think.) # time make -- completed in 25 minutes 37 seconds real time, 12 minutes 44 seconds user time, 5 minutes 29 seconds sys time, with 2 Firefox processes running in the background (one for root and one for another user) # time make install -- completed in 41 seconds ****** Summary: 1. rpm install of gtk2hs still does not work 2. rpm generating .o files at install time does not seem to be the problem, since ... 3. ... install from source mostly* works, and does generate .o files (*except for generating documentation). 4. Since I have something that works, if you want to wait for GHC 6.10, before looking at it again, that's fine with me. By the way, thanks for moving this bug to rawhide, since (I guess) that keeps it alive after Fedora 7. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 250767] RPMs for ghc-gtk2hs, ghc661-gtk2hs, won't install with 256 MB RAM
by Red Hat Bugzilla 15 Jul '08

15 Jul '08

1 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 451872] New: Package request: ghc-6.8.3
by Red Hat Bugzilla 15 Jul '08

15 Jul '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451872 Summary: Package request: ghc-6.8.3 Product: Fedora Version: 9 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: ghc AssignedTo: bos(a)serpentine.com ReportedBy: bos(a)serpentine.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-haskell- list@redhat.com,loupgaroublond@gmail.com,petersen@redhat .com This is a bugfix release: http://haskell.org/ghc/docs/6.8.3/html/users_guide/release-6-8-3.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 3

[Fedora-haskell-list] Haskell packaging for multiple Fedora releases?
by Rajesh Krishnan 15 Jul '08

15 Jul '08

Hello, I have these quick questions about submitting RPMs for different Fedora releases and a quick scan thru' the Fedora packaging guidelines did not point me in the right direction. Here it goes: If I want to submit a number of packages that would build exactly the same way (that is, identical SRPMs) on Fedora8, Fedora9 and RawHide then do I need to submit 3 different Review Requests on bugzilla.redhat.com? And what if the source RPMs that I have created are different for Fedora 8, Fedora 9 and Rawhide? Then would that call for creating 3 different Review Requests on Bugzilla? Thanks in advance. -Rajesh

3 2

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 250767] RPMs for ghc-gtk2hs, ghc661-gtk2hs, won't install with 256 MB RAM
by Red Hat Bugzilla 14 Jul '08

14 Jul '08

1 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 250767] RPMs for ghc-gtk2hs, ghc661-gtk2hs, won't install with 256 MB RAM
by Red Hat Bugzilla 14 Jul '08

14 Jul '08

1 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

haskell-devel July 2008