Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: %{ghc_version} desn't expand properly
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547867
Summary: %{ghc_version} desn't expand properly
Product: Fedora
Version: 11
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: high
Component: ghc-rpm-macros
AssignedTo: loupgaroublond(a)gmail.com
ReportedBy: jochen(a)herr-schmitt.de
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: petersen(a)redhat.com, loupgaroublond(a)gmail.com,
fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
I want to tryout ghc-6.12.1 on my system and have installed
ghc-rpm-macros-0.3.0-1 on my system.
Because I have trouble to compile my packages, I have try out the following
command:
$ rpm -q --eval '%{ghc_version}'
and got the following output:
error: Recursion depth(17) greater than max(16)
15< (empty)
14< (empty)
13< (empty)
12< (empty)
11< (empty)
10< (empty)
9< (empty)
8< (empty)
7< (empty)
6< (empty)
5< (empty)
4< (empty)
3< (empty)
2< (empty)
1< (empty)
0< (empty)
If I type
$ ghc --numeric-version
I will get
6.12.1
which I expected for
$ rpm -q --eval '%{ghc_version}'
Best Regards:
Jochen Schmitt
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: ghc-6.12.3 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=604592
Summary: ghc-6.12.3 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: ASSIGNED
Keywords: FutureFeature
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: ghc
AssignedTo: petersen(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: petersen(a)redhat.com, bos(a)serpentine.com,
loupgaroublond(a)gmail.com,
fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
Latest upstream release: 6.12.3
Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 6.12.2
URL: http://haskell.org/ghc/
Please consult the package update guidelines before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_update_guidelines
More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_Release_Monitoring
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: ghc-GLUT - bindings to the C GLUT library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517197
Summary: Review Request: ghc-GLUT - bindings to the C GLUT
library
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: bos(a)serpentine.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: notting(a)redhat.com, fedora-package-review(a)redhat.com,
fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com
Depends on: 517155
Classification: Fedora
Bryan O'Sullivan <bos(a)serpentine.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flag| |fedora-review?
Spec: http://www.serpentine.com/bos/files/ghc-GLUT.spec
SRPM: http://www.serpentine.com/bos/files/ghc-GLUT-2.1.1.2-1.fc11.src.rpm
Description:
This package provides the Haskell GLUT library for ghc.
This is a set of bindings to the C freeglut library.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: ghc-utf8-string - Support reading and writing UTF8 Strings
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503250
Summary: Review Request: ghc-utf8-string - Support reading and
writing UTF8 Strings
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Status Whiteboard: NotReady
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: oglesbyzm(a)gmail.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: notting(a)redhat.com, fedora-package-review(a)redhat.com,
fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
Clone Of: 426750
Spec URL: http://zoglesby.fedorapeople.org/ghc-hinotify.spec
SRPM URL: http://zoglesby.fedorapeople.org/ghc-utf8-string-0.3.4-1.fc11.src.rpm
Description: This library provides a wrapper to the Linux Kernel's inotify
feature,allowing applications to subscribe to notifications when a file is
accessed or modified.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: happy-1.18.5 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=605031
Summary: happy-1.18.5 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: ASSIGNED
Keywords: FutureFeature
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: happy
AssignedTo: bos(a)serpentine.com
ReportedBy: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: petersen(a)redhat.com, bos(a)serpentine.com,
fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
Latest upstream release: 1.18.5
Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 1.18.4
URL: http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/happy/
Please consult the package update guidelines before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_update_guidelines
More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_Release_Monitoring
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=580480
Shakthi Kannan <shakthimaan(a)gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flag| |fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #15 from Shakthi Kannan <shakthimaan(a)gmail.com> 2010-08-31 12:26:59 EDT ---
New Package SCM Request
=======================
Package Name: ghc-type-level
Short Description: Haskell type-level library
Owners: shakthimaan chitlesh
Branches: F-13 F-14
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=619991
Shakthi Kannan <shakthimaan(a)gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |shakthimaan(a)gmail.com
AssignedTo|nobody(a)fedoraproject.org |shakthimaan(a)gmail.com
Flag| |fedora-review?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=612076
--- Comment #3 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> 2010-08-31 03:40:52 EDT ---
I could review this if you able to review one of my pending submissions
(ghc-text is probably highest priority since it will block darcs-2.5
otherwise ghc-glib.)
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=595697
--- Comment #8 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> 2010-08-31 03:35:43 EDT ---
Feel free to continue this review when you are ready.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=580480
Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #14 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> 2010-08-31 03:33:41 EDT ---
Thanks, here is the final review:
+:ok, =:needs attention, -:needs fixing, NA: not applicable
MUST Items:
[] MUST: rpmlint output
ghc-type-level.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Haskell -> Gaskell,
Gaitskell, Skellum
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.
ghc-type-level.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Haskell -> Gaskell,
Gaitskell, Skellum
ghc-type-level.x86_64: W: executable-stack
/usr/lib64/ghc-6.12.1/type-level-0.2.4/libHStype-level-0.2.4-ghc6.12.1.so
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.
ghc-type-level-devel.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Haskell ->
Gaskell, Gaitskell, Skellum
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.
ghc-type-level-prof.x86_64: E: devel-dependency ghc-type-level-devel
ghc-type-level-prof.x86_64: W: no-documentation
ghc-type-level-prof.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib64/ghc-6.12.1/type-level-0.2.4/libHStype-level-0.2.4_p.a
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 2 warnings.
All standard and waived
[+] MUST: Package Naming Guidelines
[+] MUST: spec file name must match base package %{name}
[+] MUST: Packaging Guidelines.
[+] MUST: Licensing Guidelines
[+] MUST: License field in the package spec file must match actual license.
[+] MUST: include license files in %doc if available in source
[+] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English and be legible.
[+] MUST: source md5sum matches upstream release
4aca3b4fd0a56377ffa79464cf491509 type-level-0.2.4.tar.gz
[+] MUST: must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on one main arch
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2436860
[+] MUST: if necessary use ExcludeArch for other archs
[+] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires
[NA] MUST: packages which store shared library files in the dynamic linker's
default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun.
[+] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not
create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does
create that directory.
[+] MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing.
[+] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set
with executable permissions, for example.
[+] MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf
%{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT).
[+] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros, as described in the macros
section of Packaging Guidelines.
Only minimal differences to cabal2spec template.
[+] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content.
[+] MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the
runtime of the application.
[+] MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package.
[NA] MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package.
[NA] MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g.
libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in
a -devel package.
[+] MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base
package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} =
%{version}-%{release}
[+] MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these should be
removed in the spec.
[+] MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other
packages.
[+] MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8.
SHOULD Items:
[+] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[+] SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane.
[+] SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base
package using a fully versioned dependency.
Package is APPROVED.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.