haskell-devel September 2018

haskell-devel@lists.stg.fedoraproject.org

1 participants
66 discussions

[Bug 1436961] New: xmonad-mate: Programs started from menus don' t have access to ssh-agent
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 30 Nov '18

30 Nov '18

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1436961 Bug ID: 1436961 Summary: xmonad-mate: Programs started from menus don't have access to ssh-agent Product: Fedora Version: 25 Component: xmonad Severity: medium Assignee: mathstuf(a)gmail.com Reporter: dgibson(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: haskell-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, mathstuf(a)gmail.com, petersen(a)redhat.com Description of problem: When using XMonad with MATE, programs which use ssh internally don't seem to be able to access the ssh-agent, and request passwords unexpectedly. The same programs started from a terminal are able to access the ssh-agent and don't request passwords. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): xmonad-mate-0.12-2.fc25.x86_64 ghc-xmonad-0.12-2.fc25.x86_64 openssh-clients-7.4p1-4.fc25.x86_64 mate-session-manager-1.16.1-1.fc25.x86_64 How reproducible: 100% Steps to Reproduce: 1. Start xmonad-mate session 2. Open a terminal and add a key with ssh-add 3. From the MATE menus, run a program which uses ssh internally, such as vinagre (with proxy through SSH enabled) or virt-manager (with a qemu+ssh connection to the backend) 4. Attempt to connect to a host where you have ssh public key authorization Actual results: Program prompts for a password on the remote host. Expected results: Connects without password, using the key already given to the ssh-agent. Additional info: Running the same program (e.g. vinagre or virt-manager) from a terminal behaves as expected, using the key in the agent to connect without further authentication. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 34

[Bug 1497456] New: pandoc does not support https
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 30 Nov '18

30 Nov '18

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1497456 Bug ID: 1497456 Summary: pandoc does not support https Product: Fedora Version: 26 Component: pandoc Severity: high Assignee: petersen(a)redhat.com Reporter: ourson77(a)gmail.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: haskell-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, petersen(a)redhat.com Description of problem: Rendering RMarkdown documents fails due to missing https support in pandoc Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): pandoc-1.19.1-1.fc26.x86_64 How reproducible: Create a new revealjs presentation (e.g. the example in https://github.com/rstudio/revealjs) and try to render it by running R -e 'rmarkdown::render("example.Rmd")' Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: Get the following error message: Fetching https://fonts.googleapis.com/css?family=Ubuntu:300,700,300italic,700italic... pandoc: Could not fetch https://fonts.googleapis.com/css?family=Ubuntu:300,700,300italic,700italic user error (https not supported) Error: pandoc document conversion failed with error 67 Execution halted Expected results: Rendering the Rmarkdown to html should (as it does if using e.g. pandoc included with RStudio) Additional info: It seems that https support is explicitly disabled in the pandoc SRPM for Fedora. Fixing the problem is thus trivial, simply remove cabal-tweak-flag https False in %prep step -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 10

[Bug 1529452] New: ghc crashes while compiling vty
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 10 Nov '18

10 Nov '18

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1529452 Bug ID: 1529452 Summary: ghc crashes while compiling vty Product: Fedora Version: 27 Component: ghc Assignee: petersen(a)redhat.com Reporter: arun(a)accosted.net QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: haskell-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, petersen(a)redhat.com I'm trying to compile vty from: https://github.com/jtdaugherty/vty Steps to build are just: cabal install A friend is able to compile with the same version of ghc/cabal on Mac (and there seem to be builds on Stackage too), so I suspect this one might be specific to the Fedora package. With verbose output, the log is: /usr/bin/ghc --make -fbuilding-cabal-package -O -j4 -static -dynamic-too -dynosuf dyn_o -dynhisuf dyn_hi -outputdir dist/build -odir dist/build -hidir dist/build -stubdir dist/build -i -idist/build -isrc -idist/build/autogen -Idist/build/autogen -Idist/build -Icbits -optP-include -optPdist/build/autogen/cabal_macros.h -this-unit-id vty-5.19-AcWcRwAEuQe1JaFCUmZxvJ -hide-all-packages -package-db dist/package.conf.inplace -package-id base-4.9.1.0 -package-id blaze-builder-0.4.0.2-4dt8fa7cYBwH6AnGaJjL67 -package-id bytestring-0.10.8.1 -package-id containers-0.5.7.1 -package-id deepseq-1.4.2.0 -package-id directory-1.3.0.0 -package-id filepath-1.4.1.1 -package-id hashable-1.2.6.1-Bzr6e0JXpfWDwACR5BLUFL -package-id microlens-0.4.8.1-BVhsezHoPw9Ez18LAXVtpM -package-id microlens-mtl-0.1.11.0-DUw2PmHlGVpKNBqgym7KZp -package-id microlens-th-0.4.1.1-JmCsIxOlegZ2ZqQSjWaB11 -package-id mtl-2.2.1-IWO3loU8ap0EymyNStY2sS -package-id parallel-3.2.1.1-KQJHWCcq2Ka569Stb10nhx -package-id parsec-3.1.11-CgdaBQJ9lPX9xdS1zArtVY -package-id stm-2.4.4.1-JQn4hNPyYjP5m9AcbI88Ve -package-id terminfo-0.4.1.0-FNScbjwxa2Y3p4e5RvG3l -package-id text-1.2.3.0-70ldaoxeFu2DFOOnxfdBHd -package-id transformers-0.5.5.0-H2bD029pEsWHDboiJI5ebg -package-id unix-2.7.2.1 -package-id utf8-string-1.0.1.1-1DpjxLeTvGg7ttZZojxJR5 -package-id vector-0.12.0.1-3G3NZWoZk1KG3UwVz7M3yD -XHaskell2010 -XScopedTypeVariables -XForeignFunctionInterface Graphics.Vty Graphics.Vty.Attributes Graphics.Vty.Config Graphics.Vty.Error Graphics.Vty.Image Graphics.Vty.Inline Graphics.Vty.Inline.Unsafe Graphics.Vty.Input Graphics.Vty.Input.Events Graphics.Vty.Picture Graphics.Vty.Output Graphics.Text.Width Codec.Binary.UTF8.Debug Data.Terminfo.Parse Data.Terminfo.Eval Graphics.Vty.Debug Graphics.Vty.DisplayAttributes Graphics.Vty.Image.Internal Graphics.Vty.Input.Classify Graphics.Vty.Input.Classify.Types Graphics.Vty.Input.Classify.Parse Graphics.Vty.Input.Loop Graphics.Vty.Input.Mouse Graphics.Vty.Input.Focus Graphics.Vty.Input.Paste Graphics.Vty.Input.Terminfo Graphics.Vty.PictureToSpans Graphics.Vty.Span Graphics.Vty.Output.Mock Graphics.Vty.Output.Interface Graphics.Vty.Output.XTermColor Graphics.Vty.Output.TerminfoBased Graphics.Vty.Attributes.Color Graphics.Vty.Attributes.Color240 Graphics.Vty.Debug.Image Graphics.Vty.Input.Terminfo.ANSIVT -O2 -funbox-strict-fields -Wall -fspec-constr '-fspec-constr-count=10' [15 of 36] Compiling Graphics.Vty.Input.Loop ( src/Graphics/Vty/Input/Loop.hs, dist/build/Graphics/Vty/Input/Loop.o ) zsh: segmentation fault (core dumped) cabal build -v2 And this is from the journal: Dec 28 12:57:20 falcon systemd-coredump[19341]: Process 19315 (ghc) of user 1000 dumped core. Stack trace of thread 19326: #0 0x00007effeeba5e5c ghczmprim_GHCziClasses_eqInt_info (libHSghc-prim-0.5.0.0-ghc8.0.2.so) Dec 28 12:57:20 falcon systemd-coredump[19343]: Process 19310 (cabal) of user 1000 dumped core. Stack trace of thread 19310: #0 0x00007f0b12902957 kill (libc.so.6) #1 0x00007f0b13ee896d exitBySignal (libHSrts_thr-ghc8.0.2.so) #2 0x00007f0b13ee8f1e shutdownHaskellAndSignal (libHSrts_thr-ghc8.0.2.so) #3 0x00007f0b14ff76b3 n/a (libHSbase-4.9.1.0-ghc8.0.2.so) Dec 28 12:57:21 falcon audit[1]: SERVICE_STOP pid=1 uid=0 auid=4294967295 ses=4294967295 subj=system_u:system_r:init_t:s0 msg='unit=systemd-coredump@9-19342-0 comm="systemd" exe="/usr/lib/systemd/systemd" hostna Dec 28 12:57:21 falcon audit[1]: SERVICE_STOP pid=1 uid=0 auid=4294967295 ses=4294967295 subj=system_u:system_r:init_t:s0 msg='unit=systemd-coredump@8-19340-0 comm="systemd" exe="/usr/lib/systemd/systemd" hostna Dec 28 12:57:22 falcon abrt-server[19361]: Deleting problem directory ccpp-2017-12-28-12:57:21.361327-19315 (dup of ccpp-2017-12-16-18:56:49.979482-1237) Dec 28 12:57:22 falcon abrt-notification[19404]: Process 1237 (ghc) crashed in ghczmprim_GHCziClasses_eqInt_info() Dec 28 12:57:23 falcon abrt-server[19365]: Deleting problem directory ccpp-2017-12-28-12:57:21.895840-19310 (dup of ccpp-2017-12-20-21:37:50.757520-12430) Dec 28 12:57:23 falcon org.freedesktop.problems[977]: abrt-dbus: Lock file '.lock' is locked by process 19450 Dec 28 12:57:23 falcon abrt-notification[19451]: Process 12430 (cabal) crashed in exitBySignal() -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 5

[Bug 1442648] New: ghc-dbus-0.10.13 is available
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 09 Nov '18

09 Nov '18

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1442648 Bug ID: 1442648 Summary: ghc-dbus-0.10.13 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: ghc-dbus Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: dcallagh(a)redhat.com Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: dcallagh(a)redhat.com, haskell-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Latest upstream release: 0.10.13 Current version/release in rawhide: 0.10.12-3.fc26 URL: http://hackage.haskell.org/package/dbus Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/1052/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 17

[Bug 1486878] New: ghc-8.2.1 is available
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 31 Oct '18

31 Oct '18

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1486878 Bug ID: 1486878 Summary: ghc-8.2.1 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: ghc Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: petersen(a)redhat.com Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: haskell-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, petersen(a)redhat.com Latest upstream release: 8.2.1 Current version/release in rawhide: 8.0.2-59.fc27 URL: https://haskell.org/ghc/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/906/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 32

[Bug 1445210] New: missing dependency on ghc-Cabal-devel
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 29 Oct '18

29 Oct '18

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1445210 Bug ID: 1445210 Summary: missing dependency on ghc-Cabal-devel Product: Fedora Version: 25 Component: cabal-install Assignee: petersen(a)redhat.com Reporter: m(a)matejsmid.cz QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: haskell-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, petersen(a)redhat.com Description of problem: All cabal install commands fail without ghc-Cabal-devel package installed. For users not familiar with haskell it is hard to resolve the problem. Cabal is often used as installer without any further haskell development. The package ghc-Cabal-devel should be considerer as dependency. How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: $ cabal install array Actual results: Resolving dependencies... Configuring array-0.5.1.1... Failed to install array-0.5.1.1 Build log ( /home/kafka/.cabal/logs/array-0.5.1.1.log ): cabal: Error: some packages failed to install: array-0.5.1.1 failed during the configure step. The exception was: user error (The package 'array' requires Cabal library version -any && >=1.10 but no suitable version is installed.) Expected results: Resolving dependencies... Configuring array-0.5.1.1... Building array-0.5.1.1... Installed array-0.5.1.1 Additional info: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 8

[Bug 1634010] Review Request: ghc-simple-cmd - Simple String-based process commands
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 29 Sep '18

29 Sep '18

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1634010 --- Comment #4 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> --- Thank you very much https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/8353 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1634010] Review Request: ghc-simple-cmd - Simple String-based process commands
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 28 Sep '18

28 Sep '18

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1634010 Robert-André Mauchin <zebob.m(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |POST CC| |zebob.m(a)gmail.com Assignee|nobody(a)fedoraproject.org |zebob.m(a)gmail.com Flags| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Robert-André Mauchin <zebob.m(a)gmail.com> --- Package approved. Package Review ============== Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed ===== MUST items ===== C/C++: [x]: Package does not contain kernel modules. [x]: Package contains no static executables. [x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. Note: Unversioned so-files in private %_libdir subdirectory (see attachment). Verify they are not in ld path. [x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la) [x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs. Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "BSD 3-clause "New" or "Revised" License", "Unknown or generated". 7 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/bob/packaging/review/ghc-simple-cmd/review-ghc- simple-cmd/licensecheck.txt [x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. [x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise. [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [-]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 143360 bytes in 18 files. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package does not use a name that already exists. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local ===== SHOULD items ===== Generic: [-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [?]: Package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [x]: Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [-]: %check is present and all tests pass. [x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified. ===== EXTRA items ===== Generic: [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package is arched. [x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM. Rpmlint ------- Checking: ghc-simple-cmd-0.1.0.0-1.fc30.x86_64.rpm ghc-simple-cmd-devel-0.1.0.0-1.fc30.x86_64.rpm ghc-simple-cmd-0.1.0.0-1.fc30.src.rpm ghc-simple-cmd.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US readProcess -> read Process, read-process, reprocess ghc-simple-cmd.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US readProcessWithExitCode ghc-simple-cmd.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US rawSystem -> raw System, raw-system, systematize ghc-simple-cmd.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US shelly -> Shelly, shell, shells ghc-simple-cmd.x86_64: W: invalid-url URL: https://hackage.haskell.org/package/simple-cmd The read operation timed out ghc-simple-cmd.x86_64: W: no-documentation ghc-simple-cmd.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US readProcess -> read Process, read-process, reprocess ghc-simple-cmd.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US readProcessWithExitCode ghc-simple-cmd.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US rawSystem -> raw System, raw-system, systematize ghc-simple-cmd.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US shelly -> Shelly, shell, shells 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 10 warnings. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1633935] Review Request: ghc-gi-gtk - Gtk bindings
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 28 Sep '18

28 Sep '18

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1633935 --- Comment #4 from Gwyn Ciesla <limburgher(a)gmail.com> --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ghc-gi-gtk -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1633935] Review Request: ghc-gi-gtk - Gtk bindings
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 28 Sep '18

28 Sep '18

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1633935 --- Comment #3 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> --- Thank you, Robert-André https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/8338 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

haskell-devel September 2018