infrastructure October 2008

infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org

37 participants
59 discussions

Patch to fix EPEL dep scripts
by Michael Stahnke 01 Dec '08

01 Dec '08

I think I solved the repo-closure/deps scripts issues. Now it should be back to sending only one email, (instead of 6). Also, there was an indentation issue in the reporting program that was causing the dependencies problems to be cleared. Please test this once before putting in production. I tested the best I could on publictest16 and my home systems, but I didn't have full access to all yum repos anywhere. Additionally, I changed the shell script to reference local copies of yum.conf and rc-report.cfg. I think that is probably ok, but somebody should verify. stahnma

4 8

Spins on fedorapeople
by Mike McGrath 31 Oct '08

31 Oct '08

Sebastian, I was pretty clear with you on IRC. Fedora People is not a location to bypass Fedora's normal policies and procedures. You asked for space on Fedora People to post your ISO, it was denied because its going through the approval process for Fedora. The Board approved it and I assume releng will soon at which point in time the spin will get built and distributed through normal means. In short, remove it. Fedora people is not an iso distribution mirror. We have procedures in place to host isos and you have been made aware of these procedures. I'm not sure who increased your space for this but when someone says no, asking others until someone says yes is in poor judgement. I know this sounds harsh but I want this message to be as clear as I can as it was ignored a few days ago. -Mike

1 0

Introduction
by Don Harper 30 Oct '08

30 Oct '08

Been lurking a bit, decided to say hello. I have been using RH/Fedora since the Mother's Day release, and it has been my primary desktop since then. I have in the past been a line SA doing 1st, 2nd, and 3rd level support. I have been a sales-engineer supporting Linux solutions. I have been a php developer. I have been a enterprise solutions consultant (love that term :). I am currently a senior engineer at a large bank support RHEL. I was a member of the Red Hat Beta team pretty much its whole time. I have RHCE for RH 6.x, 8, and RHEL 5. I have at one point or another been postmaster, webmaster, firewall master, configuration tzar, provisioning tzar, and hardware monkey. I live in America/Chicago timezone (just outside of Houston, TX). How can I help? :) Don -- ......................................................... . Don Harper, RHCE . We first make our habits, and . . duck(a)duckland.org . then our habits make us. - John . . www.donharper.org . Dryden . .........................................................

2 1

Introduction with some notes about me experience and skills
by Angel Natan Villegas Vicencio 30 Oct '08

30 Oct '08

Professional Resume Hi every body i want to join to the fedora infrastructure team, add something of my skills - System Administrator on RedHat 7.3, RedHat Advanced Server 2.1, RedHat Enterprise Linux 3, RedHat Enterprise Linux 4, RedHat Enterprise Linux 5, - Configurations and Installations of Redhat servers through PXE and kickstars files - Configurations of yum repositories for provisioning redhat servers ( 2.1, 3, 4, and 5 ) - LVM Filesystems - Bash Scripting - Technical Management of network services on Redhat (Radius, DNS, DHCP, LDAP, Postfix,) - Technical Management on VMware Server and Xen. - Backup Administrator in tape library MSL6000 with Omniback II. - Storage Administrator in Storage Strategies with EVA500 - Monitoring Administrator with Nagios, open source tool. - Technical knowledge on IBM and HP Hardware such as Blade Servers HS21(IBM), xSeries 3250-3850 (IBM), Blades Server BL20PG2 (HP), DL360 G2 , DL380 G2 , DL580 G2 (HP). - Firewall and VPNs Administrator on Netscreen Appliance Thank you ever body ...

2 1

Away next week
by Mike McGrath 30 Oct '08

30 Oct '08

I forgot to mention during the meeting that i'll be gone starting Thursday and ending on Sunday. I'll also be only partially available on Wed. -Mike

1 0

Meeting Log - 2008-10-30
by Ricky Zhou 30 Oct '08

30 Oct '08

19:59 -!- mmcgrath changed the topic of #fedora-meeting to: Infrastructure -- Role Call. Who's here? 19:59 * ricky 20:00 < themayor> nope were good 20:00 < themayor> thanks guys 20:00 * SmootherFrOgZ here 20:00 * wcattey makes his way to the exit as the meeting changes. 20:01 < smooge> here 20:01 < mmcgrath> Ok, lets get started 20:01 -!- notting [n=notting@redhat/notting] has joined #fedora-meeting 20:02 < fugolini> Just a small comunication for FAmSCo members, the meeting is going to be held in #fedora-ambassadors 20:02 < mmcgrath> First we'll hit up the release tickets. 20:02 -!- mmcgrath changed the topic of #fedora-meeting to: Infrastructure -- Release Tickets 20:02 < mmcgrath> .tiny https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/report/9 20:02 < zodbot> mmcgrath: http://tinyurl.com/5onzad 20:02 < mmcgrath> .ticket 932 20:02 < zodbot> mmcgrath: #932 (Preview website) - Fedora Infrastructure - Trac - https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/932 20:02 < mmcgrath> ricky: if you've got that would you mind accepting the ticket? 20:03 < ricky> Sure 20:03 < mmcgrath> solid 20:03 < mmcgrath> ricky: are there any blockers with that or anything you need from us? 20:03 -!- wcattey [n=devnull(a)HANTA-YO.MIT.EDU] has left #fedora-meeting ["Leaving"] 20:03 < ricky> Nope, I'll just make sure to confirm the torrent URLs early, and we'll be using the current get-fedora for the preview 20:04 < mmcgrath> Will you be doing the actual flip on release day or should someone else? If not you please note it in the ticket. 20:04 < mmcgrath> <nod> feel free to cc f13 on there and have him give the names to you. 20:04 < mmcgrath> next ticket 20:04 < mmcgrath> .ticket 933 20:04 < zodbot> mmcgrath: #933 (Preview release - Verify mirror space) - Fedora Infrastructure - Trac - https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/933 20:04 < mmcgrath> I'm going to do this, I'm pretty sure we're find 20:04 < mmcgrath> err fine 20:04 < mmcgrath> .ticket 935 20:04 < zodbot> mmcgrath: #935 (Preview - Mirror Coordination) - Fedora Infrastructure - Trac - https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/935 20:04 < mdomsch_> hi 20:04 < mmcgrath> f13: mdomsch_: what do we do for preview releases there? Anything special? do we even need to tell them about it or do we just let it happen? 20:04 -!- AndreasR [n=zeus(a)80-218-142-182.dclient.hispeed.ch] has left #fedora-meeting ["Verlassend"] 20:05 -!- moixs [n=chatzill(a)77-56-144-93.dclient.hispeed.ch] has left #fedora-meeting [] 20:05 < mdomsch_> f13 usually sends an email before posting the bits 20:05 < mdomsch_> when he knows they're close to being ready 20:05 < mdomsch_> that's all 20:06 < mmcgrath> kew, I figured its simple 20:06 < mmcgrath> .ticket 936 20:06 < zodbot> mmcgrath: #936 (Preview release - Mirror bit verification) - Fedora Infrastructure - Trac - https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/936 20:06 < mmcgrath> SmootherFrOgZ: you're on this one. We've never really done this before (which is bad) but you're the man now, care to let us know what you're going to do? :) 20:07 < SmootherFrOgZ> no pb ;) 20:07 < mmcgrath> part of it is making sure the permissions are right and syncing, what else is there? 20:08 < SmootherFrOgZ> i think that's it 20:08 < mdomsch_> and that jesse lands the content in the right place :-) 20:08 < mmcgrath> k, I suppose we could -V the packages too if you were real hard core about it. 20:08 < SmootherFrOgZ> correct 20:08 < mmcgrath> mdomsch_: yeah, good point :) 20:09 < mmcgrath> .ticket 937 20:09 < zodbot> mmcgrath: #937 (Preview - Infrastructure Change Freeze) - Fedora Infrastructure - Trac - https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/937 20:09 < mmcgrath> I've got this one, everything's been fine. 20:09 < mmcgrath> It is interesting to note how much more quiet nagios is when we're in a change freeze :) 20:09 * dgilmore is here 20:09 * mmcgrath hopes he doesn't jynx it 20:09 < mmcgrath> and 20:09 < mmcgrath> .ticket 934 20:09 * nirik wonders if this release will be the first with no RHIT interaction needed... or do they still need to flip something? 20:09 < mmcgrath> dgilmore: yo 20:09 < zodbot> mmcgrath: #934 (Preview Release Ticket) - Fedora Infrastructure - Trac - https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/934 20:10 -!- sternecg [n=sternecg(a)ohnat.bristolwest.com] has joined #fedora-meeting 20:10 -!- buggbot [n=supybot(a)landfill.bugzilla.org] has quit Read error: 104 (Connection reset by peer) 20:10 < mmcgrath> nirik: this could be the first one, I can't remember if they were involved for F9 or not... 20:10 < mdomsch_> nirik, they do not 20:10 < dgilmore> mmcgrath: i think alot of nagios noise is people not scheduling downtime when doing work 20:10 < mdomsch_> mmcgrath, nope, not since the composes happen in PHX now 20:10 < mmcgrath> kew 20:11 * nirik nods. Cool. 20:11 < mmcgrath> so that release ticket is mostly just a tracker. it'll be closed when the release is out. 20:11 < mmcgrath> So thats really it with the preview release, any one have any questions or concerns? Speak your mind. 20:11 < dgilmore> mmcgrath, nirik: i think they were not involved in F-9 20:11 * nirik thought they were, but could be misremembering. 20:11 < mmcgrath> my brain doesn't go back that far. 20:11 < ricky> What is the status of myfedora with regard to the final release? 20:12 * ricky remembers seeing a blog post about it 20:12 < mmcgrath> ricky: wait till the floor is open :-P 20:12 < mmcgrath> which is pretty soon 20:12 < ricky> Oop, sorry 20:12 -!- mmcgrath changed the topic of #fedora-meeting to: Infrastructure -- Tickets 20:12 < mmcgrath> .tiny https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/query?status=new&status=assi… 20:12 < zodbot> mmcgrath: http://tinyurl.com/5g3oxm 20:12 < mmcgrath> err not that 20:12 < mmcgrath> .tiny https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/query?status=new&status=assi… 20:12 < zodbot> mmcgrath: http://tinyurl.com/2hyyz6 20:12 < mmcgrath> that one ^^ 20:12 < mmcgrath> only one 20:12 < mmcgrath> .ticket 740 20:13 < zodbot> mmcgrath: #740 (Loaning out system time to OLPC participants) - Fedora Infrastructure - Trac - https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/740 20:13 < mmcgrath> dgilmore: heard any news on this? I haven't. I assume its a pretty low priority 20:13 < dgilmore> mmcgrath: not heard anything more 20:13 < mmcgrath> k 20:13 < mmcgrath> in that case 20:13 < mmcgrath> I've just got a couple of items this week. 20:14 -!- mmcgrath changed the topic of #fedora-meeting to: Infrastructure -- oVirt 20:14 < mmcgrath> Nothing real new with the ovirt looks this week, I also just started looking at enomalism. 20:14 < mmcgrath> They did release 0.84 (ovirt) and I've downloaded that. 20:14 < mmcgrath> So nothing real new. 20:14 < f13> sorry I'm late. 20:14 < mmcgrath> f13: no worries 20:14 -!- mmcgrath changed the topic of #fedora-meeting to: Infrastructure -- Backup2 20:15 < mmcgrath> I'm working to get our off-site backup solution in order. It will be at ibiblio. It will help me sleep better at night. 20:15 < mmcgrath> Its basically going to be a combination lvm + snapshot + nightly rsync type setup. 20:15 < ricky> Will it be everything or just a specific subset? 20:16 < mmcgrath> ricky: specific subset. Basically everything we'd need to get going again if the worst happened. 20:16 < mmcgrath> so databases, puppet configs, cvs, lookaside cache, etc. 20:16 < mdomsch_> hosted 20:16 < mmcgrath> it will likely be on an encrypted filesystem of some kind. 20:16 < mmcgrath> mdomsch_: actually hosted is already setup. We've got replicated data from hosted1 -> hosted2 in VA, and an offsite backup in PHX. 20:16 < ricky> Cool, that sounds really interesting 20:16 < mdomsch_> nice 20:16 -!- rdieter is now known as rdieter_away 20:16 < mmcgrath> yeah, we did hosted right :) 20:17 < mmcgrath> its not live replication but it is hourly IIRC. 20:17 -!- stickster is now known as stickster_afk 20:17 < mmcgrath> I've thought about doing live replication but haven't sat down and done it yet. 20:17 < mmcgrath> anywho, any questions about backup2? 20:17 < mmcgrath> kew 20:17 -!- mmcgrath changed the topic of #fedora-meeting to: Infrastructure -- Open Floor 20:17 < mmcgrath> ricky: I believe you had something? :) 20:17 -!- rkastl__ [n=rkastl(a)e181097103.adsl.alicedsl.de] has joined #fedora-meeting 20:18 < ricky> 20:11:55 < ricky> What is the status of myfedora with regard to the final release? 20:18 < ricky> 20:12:05 * ricky remembers seeing a blog post about it 20:18 < mmcgrath> ahh yes 20:18 < mmcgrath> I've not heard any status reports about myfedora 20:18 < mmcgrath> J5: lmacken: either of you two around? 20:18 < mmcgrath> can you give us a status report of my fedora or perhaps email a larger status report to the list? 20:19 * mmcgrath assumes they're absent right now. 20:19 < mmcgrath> ricky: so I'd say they have a status, but not sure what it is. I'll drop an email to see whats up 20:19 < ricky> Cool 20:19 < mmcgrath> Anyone have anything else they'd like to duscuss? 20:19 < mmcgrath> err discuss even? 20:20 < mmcgrath> mdomsch_: the ubuntu guys are pretty sweet on your mirrormanager stuff. 20:20 < mdomsch_> yeah? 20:20 < mdomsch_> pointers? 20:20 < f13> I'm getting quite close to being able to release the .newkey stuff for F8 and F9 Everything trees 20:20 * ricky wonders if nirik wanted to ask about ticket 651 20:20 < ricky> .ticket 651 20:20 < f13> it'll baloon up our mirror space for a period of time, until we prune the non .newkey content 20:20 < zodbot> ricky: #651 (system account for tier2 ppc32/x86_64 hosting for cvsextras) - Fedora Infrastructure - Trac - https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/651 20:20 < mdomsch_> f13, for Preview you're not changing the repo=rawhide parts of fedora-release, right? 20:20 < nirik> oh yeah... any news there? 20:20 < mdomsch_> but you will for RC? 20:21 < f13> however I'm not sure of the timing of releaseing this stuff, given the need to stage Preview and the F0 Final. 20:21 < mmcgrath> mdomsch: http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/2008/10/30/%23ubuntu-website.txt <-- towards the bottom. 20:21 < f13> mdomsch_: that's correct. post-preview is when I'll make all the bits look like the real thing, including the repo change. 20:21 < mmcgrath> f13: when will that happen? how much of a baloon are we talking about? 20:22 < f13> mmcgrath: I'm not sure when it'll happen. I'm more inclined to wait until after F10 goes out at this point, just because of all the churn that's upcoming. 20:22 * dgilmore would like to see ticket 651 done 20:22 -!- fbijlsma [n=fbijlsma(a)92.50.110.191] has joined #fedora-meeting 20:22 < mmcgrath> f13: k 20:22 < f13> it'll double the size of the Everything/ tree for 8 and 9 20:23 < mmcgrath> f13: mind opening a ticket for mirrorspace verification on that? 20:23 < mmcgrath> ricky: one sec on 651 20:24 * mdomsch_ gets evil thought 20:24 < mdomsch_> create a new hidden category "Ubuntu" in MM 20:24 < mdomsch_> and pretend they're at /pub/Ubuntu/ 20:24 < mdomsch_> and start serving download.fedoraproject.org/pub/Ubuntu/... 20:25 < f13> mmcgrath: I'll do that before I put any bits in place. 20:25 < mmcgrath> mdomsch_: heh 20:25 < mmcgrath> f13: solid 20:25 < mmcgrath> Ok, 20:25 < ricky> Hehe 20:25 < mmcgrath> ricky: what about 651? 20:25 < ricky> I think nirik was just asking about that 20:25 < nirik> yeah, whats the status? 20:26 < mmcgrath> loupgaroublond: you around? 20:26 * mmcgrath thinks loupgaroublond had this done but not merged to a recent tree. 20:26 < mmcgrath> we talked about it a bit ago but I don't remember its status 20:27 < loupgaroublond> mmcgrath, yes? 20:27 < loupgaroublond> mmcgrath, done what? 20:27 < mmcgrath> .ticket 651 20:27 < zodbot> mmcgrath: #651 (system account for tier2 ppc32/x86_64 hosting for cvsextras) - Fedora Infrastructure - Trac - https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/651 20:28 < loupgaroublond> is this the 'thirdparty' system deal? 20:29 < mmcgrath> yeah 20:29 < loupgaroublond> ok, iirc, we're using the privacy security features to implement this... 20:29 < loupgaroublond> in the config, a certain group is assigned 'thirdparty' and any third party system should have a login account that is a member of that group 20:30 < loupgaroublond> when pulling stuff from FAS, authenticate with that user, and not with an administrator user 20:30 < loupgaroublond> the privacy stuff, when sending out the userlists, should call the filter_private() method, which will drop the password bits, and possibly something else, though i can't remember offhand 20:31 < mmcgrath> loupgaroublond: and this is in version 0.8.4.5 or in HEAD or not yet completed? 20:31 < loupgaroublond> it's completed, though i'm not sure what's in version 0.8.4.5, so you'll have to check the git log for that 20:32 < mmcgrath> <nod> 20:32 < J5> mmcgrath: whats up? 20:32 < mmcgrath> ricky: while we're getting the next release ready lets make sure to check on that. Give it a test, etc. Then on deployment we'll let nirik and dgilmore know so they can do testing. 20:32 < mmcgrath> J5: ono momento 20:32 < mmcgrath> any other questions on ticket 651? 20:32 < ricky> mmcgrath: Sure 20:33 -!- che_ [n=rkastl@redhat/che] has quit Read error: 110 (Connection timed out) 20:33 * ricky has kvm machines setup now that'd be perfect :-) 20:33 < ricky> **virtual machines 20:33 < mmcgrath> J5: we were wondering if you could give us a status report on MyFedora? 20:33 < nirik> and it just gets ssh keys and logins, no passwords, right? 20:33 < ricky> nirik: Yup, that's the plan 20:34 < J5> ok, we are doing cleanups right now, the whole stack is packaged though the myfedora package needs some more cleanups. 20:34 < ricky> Also no real name, etc. info for people with privacy on 20:34 < nirik> great. Let me know when to test. 20:34 -!- sternecg [n=sternecg(a)ohnat.bristolwest.com] has quit "Leaving" 20:34 < J5> we have a test instance up at https://publictest16.fedoraproject.org/community 20:35 < mmcgrath> Do we have an estimated date on when it will be ready for deployment? 20:35 < ricky> Will it run on the same boxes as our other TG apps? 20:35 < J5> you can push updates from the updates tool, I show controls in the builds tool but haven't hooked that up yet 20:35 < J5> should be ready for deployment with F10 release 20:35 < dgilmore> ricky: just want public keys and usernames 20:36 < loupgaroublond> mmcgrath, the git commit's SHA is 3067a96d6cc0260c8c8bf179b93471fcb185475a 20:36 < SmootherFrOgZ> great 20:36 < mmcgrath> loupgaroublond: thank you. 20:36 < ricky> dgilmore: Hm, OK - we might have to make make sure fasClient works with just that info, then 20:36 < mmcgrath> ricky: and group info 20:36 < loupgaroublond> mmcgrath, and that appears to be master 20:36 < J5> We really just need to clean up some of the screen in terms of css and have better error handling 20:37 < dgilmore> mmcgrath: ahh yeah we might need that also 20:37 < dgilmore> ricky: ill just as gladly not have Real Names 20:37 * nirik nods at dgilmore. 20:38 < J5> just a warning to the rest of the infrastructure, I'm going to be sending in a bunch of patches during the F11 time frame as we had to drop a bunch of features because the API wasn't exposed or was exposed in a way we couldn't use very easily 20:39 < J5> mmcgrath: I have a couple of questions about deployment 20:39 < mmcgrath> J5: sure, shoot them my way. 20:39 < mmcgrath> J5: do we have any estimated date on when it will be ready for deployment? 20:39 < dgilmore> whats the url for the test instance? 20:39 < ricky> dgilmore: https://publictest16.fedoraproject.org/community 20:40 < J5> where do you want to mount myfedora? If it is under the admin.fd.o we can link off to other infrastructure bits better 20:40 < J5> two more weeks I would say 20:40 < mmcgrath> J5: doesn't matter to me, we can do admin.fedoraproject.org/myfedora/ or myfedora.fedoraproject.org/ 20:40 < ricky> That sounds good - depending on how auth is done, maybe they can share auth cookies 20:40 < J5> admin.fedoraproject.org/community 20:40 < mmcgrath> we have a *.fedoraproject.org certificate now so secure sites are cheap. 20:40 < J5> ricky: I'm already using the same cookies 20:40 < mmcgrath> yeah, wherever you guys want, doesn't matter to me. 20:41 < ricky> Nice 20:41 < J5> mmcgrath: I would like community.fedoraproject.org but that puts us in a different domain 20:42 < dgilmore> J5: have you guys tested in konqueror? 20:42 < mmcgrath> <nod> 20:42 < J5> any reason why cookies are not attached to fedoraproject.org or is that a browser thing? 20:42 < ricky> There are pages under fedoraproject.org which we couldn't 100% trust the content of 20:42 < J5> dgilmore: mostly firefox but I ran it on safari and it looked and worked fine 20:42 < ricky> Like the old wiki allowed arbitrary HTML 20:42 -!- fbijlsma [n=fbijlsma(a)92.50.110.191] has quit "Leaving" 20:42 < J5> dgilmore: would be good if we got more testing 20:43 < ricky> And then there's people.fedoraproject.org 20:43 < dgilmore> J5: i generally use konq and it seemed busted 20:43 < dgilmore> J5 i had to hit close nearly 10 times before hiting the front page 20:43 < J5> dgilmore: file bugs, some parts are busted in general that we need to clean up 20:44 < dgilmore> J5: it kept showing planet feeds on top of everything else 20:44 < dgilmore> J5: where do bugs get files 20:44 < dgilmore> filed 20:44 < dgilmore> J5: blog about it please 20:44 < J5> myfedora.fedorahosted.org 20:44 < J5> dgilmore: I did, a couple of days ago 20:44 < dgilmore> J5: i missed it 20:44 < J5> k 20:44 < dgilmore> be louder :) 20:45 < J5> NEXT TIME I WILL POST IN ALL CAPS :) 20:45 < ricky> More <blink>s in the entry 20:45 < mmcgrath> heh 20:45 < mmcgrath> Ok ok, I'm thinking we can close the meeting a little early. Anyone have anything else they'd like to discuss? 20:45 < dgilmore> J5: this could be something cool. but It needs some noise :) 20:45 < J5> ya 20:45 * dgilmore got a G1 this afternoon 20:46 < J5> mmcgrath: so I was told you use mod_ssl not mod_nss - how do you want me to configure myfedora's package? 20:46 < dgilmore> J5: AFAIK we use mod_ssl everywhere not mod_nss 20:47 < dgilmore> i know koji uses mod_ssl 20:47 < mmcgrath> J5: actually you probably won't need to worry about that, the app servers don't exist at our encryption layer. 20:48 < J5> so take out the ssl apache configs? 20:48 < mmcgrath> J5: leave it on the publictest boxes, but when it gets deployed on app[1-6] take it out, the proxy servers do our ssl encryption 20:49 < J5> my biggest problem with that is if a user installs it without ssl they could potentially send fedora passwords over the wire 20:49 < mmcgrath> if a user installs what exactly? 20:49 < J5> the myfedora rpm 20:49 < mmcgrath> and thats the webapp? 20:49 < J5> yes 20:50 < mmcgrath> ah, typically that stuff is left up to the admins. 20:51 < J5> ok, I just copied what func did 20:51 -!- DemonJester [n=DemonJes@fedora/DemonJester] has quit "leaving" 20:51 < J5> so you don't want me installing the myfedora.conf in /etc/httd/conf.d? 20:51 < mmcgrath> <nod> with Func we don't pass it through the proxy layer, its not quite a traditional webapp. 20:52 < mmcgrath> J5: thats up to you but whatever you do with it we'll be changing it and controlling it via puppet anyway :) 20:52 < mmcgrath> being a config file and all 20:52 < J5> ok cool 20:53 < mmcgrath> Ok, well we'll look forward to that in the comming weeks. 20:53 < mmcgrath> Anyone have anything else they'd like to discuss? If not we'll close the meeting in 30 20:54 < mmcgrath> 10 20:54 < J5> hey guys, test it out and blog about it 20:54 < mmcgrath> J5: sure thing 20:54 < J5> and file bugs :) 20:54 -!- mmcgrath changed the topic of #fedora-meeting to: Infrastructure -- Meeting closed

1 0

Change request: bodhi change for myfedora
by Luke Macken 30 Oct '08

30 Oct '08

Hey guys, I'd like to perform another quick bodhi upgrade soon, to add a feature needed to revoke update requests from myfedora. Should be a very low risk upgrade. https://fedorahosted.org/bodhi/changeset/bcc673fab69067e555654113d640f01525… luke

3 2

[PATCH] have supybot-fedora find ircnicks as well
by Jon Stanley 29 Oct '08

29 Oct '08

Here's a simple patch to supybot-fedora to have the 'fas' command also search ircnicks, for folks like myself whose ircnicks are not the same as their FAS name.

1 0

Using fedoraproject.org email addr in bugzilla?
by Michael Schwendt 29 Oct '08

29 Oct '08

I wonder whether it is possible to use a fedoraproject.org email alias in bugzilla without decoupling it from FAS? The connection between a bugzilla account and a Fedora account is based on the primary email address in FAS, right? So, if I update my bugzilla preferences to use the fedoraproject mail alias, does that disconnect my bugzilla account from FAS?

4 3

Change request: trivial bodhi fix
by Luke Macken 27 Oct '08

27 Oct '08

I would like to perform a trivial bodhi upgrade that contains the following patch: --- a/bodhi/controllers.py +++ b/bodhi/controllers.py @@ -168,7 +168,7 @@ class Root(controllers.RootController): forward_url= cherrypy.request.headers.get("Referer", "/") # This seems to be the cause of some bodhi-client errors - # cherrypy.response.status=403 + cherrypy.response.status=403 return dict(message=msg, previous_url=previous_url, logging_in=True, original_parameters=cherrypy.request.params, forward_url=forward_url) This reverts a workaround for a problem in python-fedora-0.2.x, which has since been resolved. This bodhi patch should hopefully resolve https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466510 as well. luke

3 2

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

infrastructure October 2008