infrastructure October 2008

infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org

37 participants
59 discussions

Re: [Fedora Infrastructure] #714: Remove hosted projects unmodified atleast for six months.
by fedora-badges 27 Oct '08

27 Oct '08

#714: Remove hosted projects unmodified atleast for six months. --------------------------------+------------------------------------------- Reporter: susmit | Owner: susmit Type: task | Status: assigned Priority: minor | Milestone: Fedora 10 Component: Hosted Projects | Version: Production Severity: Normal | Resolution: Keywords: fedorahosted, trac | --------------------------------+------------------------------------------- Comment (by susmit): nah, no decision yet. -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/714#comment:7> Fedora Infrastructure <http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure> Fedora Infrastructure Project for Bugs, feature requests and access to our source code.

1 0

Fedora Maps
by Huzaifa Sidhpurwala 27 Oct '08

27 Oct '08

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi All, As you all know, i have been working on reviving the fedora maps project for some time and seem to have reached almost completion with the current maps. This is just to give you guys a heads-up on what has been done and ask for suggestions. So the maps are hosted on fedoraproject site at: http://fedoraproject.org/maps/ I have also copied the image location and put them on the wiki so that it has a common look and feel. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Maps I am currently mapping only MirrorManager for f7 to f9 and EL-4 & EL-5 and can easily extend my scripts to maps bittorrent and also cvs commits if needed. One doubt i have is: If the directory listing shown by apache on log1 as displayed at: http://fedoraproject.org/maps/ is ok and should not pose any security risk to us. Also any suggestions are welcome. - -- Regards, Huzaifa Sidhpurwala, RHCE, CCNA (IRC: huzaifas) GnuPG Fingerprint: 3A0F DAFB 9279 02ED 273B FFE9 CC70 DCF2 DA5B DAE5 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Red Hat - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFJBUHezHDc8tpb2uURAgdrAKCRuHahMv1zJM302nrv95S6vsZ6nQCgneCa MPYkAVztD/zNaw7EzgUCnTo= =4apT -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

3 2

Re: [Fedora Infrastructure] #714: Remove hosted projects unmodified atleast for six months.
by fedora-badges 27 Oct '08

27 Oct '08

#714: Remove hosted projects unmodified atleast for six months. --------------------------------+------------------------------------------- Reporter: susmit | Owner: susmit Type: task | Status: assigned Priority: minor | Milestone: Fedora 10 Component: Hosted Projects | Version: Production Severity: Normal | Resolution: Keywords: fedorahosted, trac | --------------------------------+------------------------------------------- Comment (by huzaifas): any updates on this? From the discussion which has happened, it looks like we can go ahead and remove the 6 month old projects if they are not touched within that period? -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/714#comment:6> Fedora Infrastructure <http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure> Fedora Infrastructure Project for Bugs, feature requests and access to our source code.

1 0

Pkgdb dump breakage
by Michael Schwendt 26 Oct '08

26 Oct '08

New breakage! This time in pkgdb bugzilla plain dump. These two incomplete and broken entries are returned: Fedora|php-pear-Auth|provides methods for creating an authentication system using PHP|rakesh||

2 2

Triple Change Request
by Nigel Jones 26 Oct '08

26 Oct '08

Okay, I've got a triple whammy... 1) I want to teach proxy5 about bapp1 (patch 0001) 2) I want to fix up the httpd config for zabbix on the proxies (patch 0002) 3) I want to be able to flip the send remote commands/active checks depending on where a machine is - security (patch 0003) Patch 0003 also includes a lot of tabs->spaces because they annoyed me so much. Can I get some plusy-oneys? - Nigel -- Nigel Jones <dev(a)nigelj.com>

3 2

[PATCH] use python-bugzilla in export-bugzilla.py
by Jon Stanley 26 Oct '08

26 Oct '08

Not quite sure where else to send this, so here goes :) Attached is a patch to use python-bugzilla in export-bugzilla.py using new methods that I taught it. I can't exactly be sure that the stuff works, since partner-bugzilla doesn't have the updateperms call, and the adduser call seems to require more permissions than I seem to have on partner-bugzilla, but it seems to get there and work as best it can :) [jstanley@rugrat ~]$ python bztest.py Bugzilla user: jonstanley(a)gmail.com bugzilla password: Traceback (most recent call last): File "bztest.py", line 9, in <module> server.adduser('jonstanley(a)gmail.com','Jon Stanley') File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/bugzilla/base.py", line 689, in adduser self._adduser(user,name) File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/bugzilla/rhbugzilla.py", line 334, in _adduser r = self._proxy.bugzilla.addUser(user, name, self.user) File "/usr/lib64/python2.5/xmlrpclib.py", line 1150, in __call__ return self.__send(self.__name, args) File "/usr/lib64/python2.5/xmlrpclib.py", line 1440, in __request verbose=self.__verbose File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/bugzilla/base.py", line 776, in request return self._parse_response(h.getfile(), sock) File "/usr/lib64/python2.5/xmlrpclib.py", line 1343, in _parse_response return u.close() File "/usr/lib64/python2.5/xmlrpclib.py", line 790, in close raise Fault(**self._stack[0]) xmlrpclib.Fault: <Fault 410: 'Login Required'>

1 1

Change Request
by Nigel Jones 25 Oct '08

25 Oct '08

Hi Folks, Quick change request: Change two IPs in the zabbix manifests from .250 to .200 (I got RH's out IP incorrect... dammit). Impact: a few kb to a select few hosts to get the new config out & one very annoyed New Zealander :) Due to the way I did the manifest it shouldn't require new files to go out to _EVERY_ host (yay for foresight). Dunka in advance... - Nigel -- Nigel Jones <dev(a)nigelj.com>

3 2

Introduction
by Maurice Burrows 25 Oct '08

25 Oct '08

Hi Fedora people, I've been a Linux user for about 10 yrs and a SysAdmin for about 5-6 yrs. I can script in shell and Perl and I've started learning Python. I'm working towards RHCE with views of RHCA so I figure we can help each other out. Cheers --Maurice--

1 0

Change request: monitor auditd
by Jon Stanley 25 Oct '08

25 Oct '08

OK, this is my first nagios change - seems to be sane. Can I get two +1's since we're in a change freeze? And do we want defaulttemplate or criticaltemplate for this? [jstanley@puppet1 puppet]$ git diff diff --git a/configs/system/nagios/services/procs.cfg b/configs/system/nagios/services/procs.cfg index 49f790d..3fbca7b 100644 --- a/configs/system/nagios/services/procs.cfg +++ b/configs/system/nagios/services/procs.cfg @@ -83,4 +83,11 @@ define service { max_check_attempts 12 } +define service { + hostgroup servers + service_description Audit Daemon + check_commnad check_by_nrpe!check_auditd + use defaulttemplate +} + diff --git a/configs/system/nrpe.cfg b/configs/system/nrpe.cfg index 2fbea87..2812dbc 100644 --- a/configs/system/nrpe.cfg +++ b/configs/system/nrpe.cfg @@ -215,6 +215,7 @@ command[check_supervisor]=/usr/lib/nagios/plugins/check_procs -c 1:1 -a '/usr/bi command[check_transifex_ssh_agent]=/usr/lib/nagios/plugins/check_procs -c 1:1 -C ssh-agent -u transifex command[check_lock]=/usr/lib/nagios/plugins/check_lock command[check_nagios]=/usr/lib/nagios/plugins/check_nagios -e 5 -F /var/log/nagios/status.dat -C /usr/sbin/nagios +command[check_auditd]=/usr/lib/nagios/plugins/check_procs -c 1:1 -C 'auditd' -u root # The following examples allow user-supplied arguments and can # only be used if the NRPE daemon was compiled with support for # command arguments *AND* the dont_blame_nrpe directive in this

4 5

Blocker Bug Review Meeting :: Monday @ 14:00 UTC (fwd)
by Mike McGrath 24 Oct '08

24 Oct '08

Hey guys, thought I'd pass this along. That's a lot of bugs outstanding. We've got some pretty talented people on this list that could do a lot of good in bug fixing. I'd suggest working to fix bugs and not so much working to find them ;-) -Mike ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 21:18:09 From: John Poelstra <poelstra(a)redhat.com> Reply-To: fedora-advisory-board(a)redhat.com To: fedora-advisory-board(a)redhat.com, fedora-devel-announce(a)redhat.com Subject: Blocker Bug Review Meeting :: Monday @ 14:00 UTC A meeting is being held to review the current blocker bugs in anticipation of the Final Development Freeze this Tuesday, October 28th. All teams (thus the cc to f-a-b) in Fedora are welcome to join in and help. WHEN: Monday, October 27, 2008 @ 14:00 UTC (10 AM EDT) and going as long as we need to WHERE: irc.freenode.net #fedora-blocker Fedora 10 Blocker: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/showdependencytree.cgi?id=438943&hide_resolved=1 Fedora 10 Preview Blocker: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/showdependencytree.cgi?id=446449&hide_resolved=1 There still remain approximately 600 rawhide bugs that have not been triaged for potential blocker status and should be considered as well. These bugs are here: http://tinyurl.com/6llac8 Other tracker bugs of interest are here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping/Trackers John _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board(a)redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board

1 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

infrastructure October 2008