infrastructure November 2009

infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org

46 participants
56 discussions

PKI (Was: Re: Meeting Log - 2009-11-19)
by Mathieu Bridon 19 Nov '09

19 Nov '09

Hi, > 20:25 < dgilmore> mmcgrath: id like to try work on updating koji auth/ and notifications during F-13 life cycle > 20:26 < ricky> PKI would be nice too :-) > 20:26 -!- |pitr| [n=kvirc(a)91.150.139.57] has joined #fedora-meeting > 20:26 < mmcgrath> #idea updating koji auth and notifications > 20:26 < mmcgrath> #idea pki (ricky says he'll do this and it'll be done by january) > 20:26 < mmcgrath> :-P > 20:26 * ricky runs [snip] > 20:28 < smooge> pki? > 20:28 < smooge> sorry.. will talk off chan > 20:28 < mmcgrath> smooge: yeah our pki right now is very... ehh manual > 20:28 < mmcgrath> and not fun to manage :) Not sure that's what you're looking for, but the guys I work with have created this neat Python module to handle CAs and certs: http://bitbucket.org/faide/pki/ It's free software (MIT or PSF). Would that help ? ---------- Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)

3 2

New Subscriber - Introduction
by Ashley Biar 19 Nov '09

19 Nov '09

Hi All, My name is Ash and I have just joined the Fedora Infrastructure group. I've been playing around with Fedora in my spare time (when I could be bothered :P) since 'Core 6', and only recently have I become more eager to discover more about the OS. I built a file server for home on Fedora 10 a while ago, and will be performing a fresh install of Fedora 12 - once the download finishes. I have been working as a Unix Administrator for the past 18 months primarily working with HP-UX and RHEL3, along with IBM and EMC based SAN storage. I also have some experience with HP Data Protector 5.5. Out backup infrastructure consists of 2 physical tape libraries and 2 virtual tape libraries. I would like to participate in the fedora project in some way, however I'm not too sure what I can offer - I thought I'd check it out. Kind Regards, Ashley Biar.

2 1

Meeting Log - 2009-11-19
by Ricky Zhou 19 Nov '09

19 Nov '09

20:00 < mmcgrath> #startmeeting Infrastructure 20:00 < zodbot> Meeting started Thu Nov 19 20:00:35 2009 UTC. The chair is mmcgrath. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 20:00 < zodbot> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic. 20:00 -!- zodbot changed the topic of #fedora-meeting to: (Meeting topic: Infrastructure) 20:00 < mmcgrath> #topic Who's here? 20:00 -!- zodbot changed the topic of #fedora-meeting to: Who's here? (Meeting topic: Infrastructure) 20:00 * ricky 20:00 < dgilmore> yo 20:00 -!- geppetto [n=james(a)code.and.org] has joined #fedora-meeting 20:00 < jcollie> yo 20:00 < pitr> helo 20:01 < jcollie> is the NFR conf call supposed to be streamed and recorded? 20:01 < mmcgrath> jcollie: no idea, is that mechanism all working? 20:01 -!- a-k [n=akistler@2002:6390:a3ef:3:20d:56ff:fe10:bb8d] has joined #fedora-meeting 20:01 -!- sijis [n=sijis(a)adsl-70-131-60-234.dsl.emhril.sbcglobal.net] has joined #fedora-meeting 20:01 * nirik is hanging around in the back. 20:01 -!- josemm [i=josemm@fedora/josemm] has joined #fedora-meeting 20:01 < jcollie> mmcgrath: should be 20:01 * a-k is around 20:02 < mmcgrath> Ok, lets get started. 20:02 < mmcgrath> #topic F12 20:02 -!- zodbot changed the topic of #fedora-meeting to: F12 (Meeting topic: Infrastructure) 20:02 < mmcgrath> .tiny https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/report/9 20:02 < zodbot> mmcgrath: http://tinyurl.com/5onzad 20:02 < mmcgrath> lets go through what hasn't been closed yet 20:02 < mmcgrath> .1787 20:02 < mmcgrath> that's me, I'll close it now 20:02 < mmcgrath> .ticket 1787 20:02 < zodbot> mmcgrath: #1787 (Change Freeze) - Fedora Infrastructure - Trac - https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/1787 20:02 < mmcgrath> .ticket 1788 20:02 < zodbot> mmcgrath: #1788 (Websites) - Fedora Infrastructure - Trac - https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/1788 20:02 * ricky closes all of the websites ones 20:02 < mmcgrath> k 20:02 -!- tmz [n=tmz@fedora/tmz] has joined #fedora-meeting 20:02 < ricky> Oops, they already were :-) 20:02 * sijis is here.. 20:02 < mmcgrath> .ticket 1790 20:02 < zodbot> mmcgrath: #1790 (Verify RELENG permissions) - Fedora Infrastructure - Trac - https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/1790 20:03 * josemm is here 20:03 -!- RadicalRo [n=radical(a)193.254.32.144] has joined #fedora-meeting 20:03 < mmcgrath> smooge mentioned he might be a little late to the meeting today but that one's him and I'm sure it's fine. 20:03 < mmcgrath> .ticket 1796 20:03 < zodbot> mmcgrath: #1796 (Disable wiki caching) - Fedora Infrastructure - Trac - https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/1796 20:03 < mmcgrath> I'll do it now 20:03 < mmcgrath> .ticket 1794 20:03 < zodbot> mmcgrath: #1794 (Lessons Learned) - Fedora Infrastructure - Trac - https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/1794 20:03 < mmcgrath> And the last one, lessons learned. 20:03 < mmcgrath> what did we learn this release? 20:03 < mmcgrath> what did and didn't go well? 20:03 < smooge> egooms is here just a little slow 20:03 * abadger1999 shows up 20:04 < sijis> sixxs is not allowing uploads. i checked yesterday 20:04 < mmcgrath> I think the number of mirrors we had at release time was quite good, sat at 85% for a long time 20:04 < mmcgrath> sijis: yeah I saw your note on that on release day, what's the deal? 20:04 < sijis> so i couldn't add the torrents for ipv6 folks 20:04 < mdomsch> the bitflip still caught some mirrors by surprise 20:04 < sijis> yeah, i dunno, i posted a message on the forum and i haven't heard back. 20:04 < mdomsch> even though I had told them about it beforehand 20:04 < mdomsch> someone wanted a reminder that they should run report_mirror after manually bitflipping 20:05 < mdomsch> before the bitflip, we had ~160 mirrors checked in and ready with ISOs 20:05 < mmcgrath> smooge: just checking if 1790 is done 20:05 < geppetto> having rsync of everything available was a huge win, IMO 20:05 < mdomsch> right after the bitflip, we had ~17 ready, up to almost 100 within a few hours, and by today, we're at about 140 20:06 < smooge> mmcgrath, closing right now 20:06 < mmcgrath> mdomsch: 'caught some mirrors by surprise' was it a pretty big problem or just general murmurings? 20:06 < mdomsch> mmcgrath, general 20:06 < smooge> which is an improvement off the old days :) 20:06 < mdomsch> our emails aren't necessarily high priority 20:06 < mmcgrath> yeah 20:06 < mmcgrath> nirik: were you hanging out in #fedora on release day? How'd the mirrors hold out? 20:06 < mmcgrath> were people having problems getting to isos? 20:07 < dgilmore> sijis: they have never allowed uploads 20:07 < mmcgrath> EvilBob: how about you? 20:07 < mdomsch> also, we didn't have mirrors.*.kernel.org for several hours on release day due to their DNS breakage 20:07 * mmcgrath should have been in there but forgot. 20:07 < dgilmore> sijis: they allow you to recommend a torrent 20:07 < nirik> mmcgrath: things were good. 20:07 < sijis> dgilmore: that's what i meant. :| 20:07 < nirik> opening up the mirrors/torrents early really helped. 20:07 < EvilBob> mmcgrath: not that I noticed 20:07 < sijis> posting a link to the torrent 20:07 < mmcgrath> EvilBob: nirik: k, thanks 20:08 < mmcgrath> sijis: it's possible next release we'll have our own ipv6 torrent so that step might not be so important :) 20:08 < jcollie> yeah, my torrent seeded got pounded right after the announcement 20:08 < mmcgrath> One thing I wanted to note was the night before the release and the various problems nirik and I had with the torrent system. 20:08 < mmcgrath> but it was hard to say for sure if it was really a problem or just torrent behaving as it should. 20:08 < jcollie> s/seeded/seeder/ 20:08 < mmcgrath> nirik: how'd your seeders hold up on actual release day? 20:08 < mmcgrath> jcollie: mine did too 20:08 < mdomsch> http://fpaste.org/tGQj/ shows in text the pre-bitflip (first 3) to post-bitflip hourly count of mirrors w/ ISOs, as MM knew it 20:09 < nirik> my torrents couldn't talk to the tracker at all when I got up. I wasn't seeding. ;( 20:09 < nirik> I switched over to transmission and everything came up ok. 20:09 < jcollie> i'm just glad i put a rate limit on 20:09 < mmcgrath> mdomsch: interesting 20:09 < jcollie> i enabled DHT on my seeder, hopefully that helped 20:09 < mmcgrath> nirik: so perhaps rtorrent is teh suck? :( 20:10 -!- lxo [n=aoliva(a)201.82.249.13] has joined #fedora-meeting 20:10 < nirik> yeah, on epel at least. ;( it works fine in fedora, so not sure whats going on there. ;( 20:10 < nirik> I guess I should file a bug on it. 20:10 -!- npatil [n=npatil(a)115.240.103.68] has quit Client Quit 20:10 < mmcgrath> <nod> 20:10 < jcollie> i was using rtorrent on F12, i think it's much newer so hopefully fewer bugs 20:10 < mmcgrath> In general though, things went like clock work. 20:11 < mmcgrath> oh, there was one odd thing 20:11 < mmcgrath> stickster: you there? 20:11 < mmcgrath> What happened with the announcement? Did someone approve it or are you on some auto-approver list? 20:11 * mdomsch seeded at max for a while, has dropped off quite a bit by now 20:12 * mmcgrath assumes mr stickster is a bit busy at the moment. 20:12 < mmcgrath> mdomsch: yeah same here, I actually closed most of my seeders. 20:12 < mmcgrath> Does anyone have anything else related to the release they'd like to discuss? 20:12 < stickster> mmcgrath: Right, it auto-approved for some reaso 20:12 < stickster> *reason 20:12 < stickster> Maybe because I'm on the list of owners/moderators? 20:13 < mmcgrath> stickster: I'm officially under the opinion that relying on moderation is not a good thing :) 20:13 < stickster> In any case, I put both my emails on the "auto-hold" list now 20:13 < stickster> So nothing I post should go straight through any more, as a check measure 20:13 < stickster> Thankfully I had checked all the links, and didn't post it until almost right at the appointed time. 20:13 < mmcgrath> <nod 20:13 < mmcgrath> Ok, if no one has anything else we'll move on to the next topic 20:13 < mmcgrath> #topic Fedora 13 - Jesse's Girl. 20:13 -!- zodbot changed the topic of #fedora-meeting to: Fedora 13 - Jesse's Girl. (Meeting topic: Infrastructure) 20:13 * ricky notes that we should all keep a good eye on the webmaster@ queue 20:14 < mmcgrath> So what do we want to see in F13 for infrastructure? 20:14 < mmcgrath> I have a couple of big wants 20:14 < smooge> ah man we need to name the release that 20:14 < mmcgrath> 1) a global search engine 20:14 < mmcgrath> 2) a proper CDN. 20:14 < josemm> +1 20:15 < mmcgrath> and probably a few other things I'm forgetting at the moment. 20:15 < mmcgrath> what do others want to be working on for this release? 20:15 < abadger1999> Packagedb-0.5 w/ tags for yum and critpath markings for bodhi, releng. 20:15 -!- lxo [n=aoliva(a)201.82.249.13] has quit Read error: 60 (Operation timed out) 20:15 < mmcgrath> oh, 3) finalize alt.fp.o, secondary.fp.o, etc. 20:15 < mmcgrath> 4) death to the term cloud 20:15 < jcollie> is there any F/OSS CDN software? i've never gone looking 20:15 < mdomsch> MM push mechanism, maybe using qpid 20:15 < mmcgrath> but that's a bit out of scope :) 20:15 * lmacken rolls in late 20:16 < mmcgrath> jcollie: I've been talking on various mailing lists, it seems almost everyone rolls their own 20:16 < mmcgrath> and they do it with geiop 20:16 < abadger1999> amqp server that's receiving notifications from cvs and maybe a notification server working off of those messages to replace the cvs syncmail script. 20:16 < ricky> Geo DNS sounds cool :-) 20:16 < mmcgrath> mdomsch: BTW, remember that "have central servers redirect to us1.fedoraproject.org, de1.fedoraproject.org, etc idea? 20:16 < mmcgrath> Someone mentioned on another list that it does horrible things to search engines and page rank. 20:16 < mdomsch> mmcgrath, yes... 20:17 < mmcgrath> looks like everyone in almost every case is using geoip so I see no reason we shouldn't continue down that road. 20:17 < mdomsch> geoip and not geodns 20:17 < mmcgrath> err sorry, geodns 20:17 < mdomsch> ok 20:17 < mmcgrath> I guess I kind of group those into the same technology but they're really not are they? 20:17 < smooge> pretty much everyone I know has tried something else at one point and then just went with geoip after some flameout 20:17 < mdomsch> similar, but at different levels 20:18 < nirik> abadger1999: self service cvs requests? :) 20:18 < jcollie> hmm does BIND do geodns now? iirc the powerdns stuff looked icky to me 20:18 < mdomsch> jcollie, yes, warthog9 wrote a patch for it 20:18 < mmcgrath> jcollie: it doesn't yet 20:18 < ricky> wikipedia uses pdns for what it's worth 20:18 < mmcgrath> not natively anyway 20:18 < abadger1999> nirik: Yeah, But not for 0.5.0; maybe 0.5.1. 20:18 < ricky> And it has a backend that takes bind-like zonefiles too 20:18 < mdomsch> everyone else uses pdns 20:18 < smooge> centos uses pdns 20:18 < abadger1999> nirik: I'm sorry, about the btw, it's pretty simple so I keep tossing it at new people but they keep tossing it back. It must have the kiss of death or something. 20:19 < jcollie> does powerdns do dnssec too? i'd rather not go backwards on that front 20:19 < mmcgrath> smooge: oh, that's good to know. Do you know who's primarly in charge of it? z00dax or Evolution? 20:19 < nirik> abadger1999: no worries. Would be nice tho. 20:19 < mmcgrath> jcollie: my understanding is yes. 20:19 < mmcgrath> jcollie: but we'll have to verify that. 20:19 < smooge> I think it was Johnny at one point, but it may have moved to Evolution. 20:19 * mmcgrath will ping those guys and find out. 20:19 < smooge> I didn't ask to be blessed to the level of knowing. 20:20 < mmcgrath> Anyone have any other infrastructure technologies they'd like to see? 20:20 < mmcgrath> #help 20:20 < mmcgrath> #idea global search engine 20:20 < mmcgrath> #idea proper CDN probably with geodns and pdns 20:20 < mmcgrath> #idea finalization of the new primary mirror 20:20 < mmcgrath> #idea message bus 20:21 < mmcgrath> #idea MM messaging of some kind 20:21 < smooge> #idea cloud replacement 20:21 < mmcgrath> :) 20:21 < mmcgrath> am I forgetting anything? 20:21 < abadger1999> #idea pkgdb w/ tags and critpath 20:21 < mmcgrath> lmacken: do you guys have any major milestones to have done for this release wrt fcommunity? 20:21 < mmcgrath> #idea insight (probably very soon here) 20:21 < ricky> Zikula for docs would be awesome :-) 20:21 < jcollie> do we wanna go down the road of replacing CVS with ??? for packages? or leave that to rel-eng to figure out 20:21 < abadger1999> #idea notification server (amqp => email) 20:21 < lmacken> mmcgrath: ideally AMQP integration... hooks into our services and live widgets to expose them 20:22 < mmcgrath> <nod> 20:22 < mmcgrath> #idea fedoracommunity AMQP integration with widgets 20:22 < mmcgrath> jcollie: actually I believe there's goign to be a talk of that at fudcon 20:22 < jcollie> ftalk front end in fedoracommunity? 20:22 < lmacken> jcollie: I saw a 'talk' branch in git that ian was hacking on 20:22 < pitr> I'm new here but if You are still using cvs its quite easy to swith to svn from it 20:22 < mmcgrath> but I'm not sure if it'll make it for F13, maybe F14 20:23 < mmcgrath> pitr: we've discussed that in the past, what you gain by doing that is questionable. 20:23 < mmcgrath> people are generally looking to improve workflow, not just the technology on the back end. 20:23 < abadger1999> pitr: Yeah... but the only people who want to move are people who want dvcs so we'll either stick w/ cvs or go dvcs. 20:23 < smooge> rewrite of all infrastructure in go? 20:24 < jcollie> hg and git are the leading candidates, but it's kind of a religious question at this point 20:24 < abadger1999> is go the new javascript? 20:24 < abadger1999> :-) 20:24 -!- lxo [n=aoliva(a)201.82.249.13] has joined #fedora-meeting 20:24 < mmcgrath> smooge: go ftw! 20:24 < jcollie> the few samples of go code i have seen so far are about as pretty as perl code 20:25 < smooge> abadger1999, only after its been made into a plugin 20:25 -!- Padula [n=rodrigop(a)189.106.61.252] has joined #fedora-meeting 20:25 < mmcgrath> Ok, does anyone have anything else on this topic? If not we'll move on to the next topic 20:25 < smooge> abadger1999, I thinks it going to be just someone will have to be a villain and say its X. so sorry 20:25 < dgilmore> mmcgrath: id like to try work on updating koji auth/ and notifications during F-13 life cycle 20:26 < ricky> PKI would be nice too :-) 20:26 -!- |pitr| [n=kvirc(a)91.150.139.57] has joined #fedora-meeting 20:26 < mmcgrath> #idea updating koji auth and notifications 20:26 < mmcgrath> #idea pki (ricky says he'll do this and it'll be done by january) 20:26 < mmcgrath> :-P 20:26 * ricky runs 20:26 -!- Padula [n=rodrigop(a)189.106.61.252] has quit Client Quit 20:26 < dgilmore> #idea further streamling and full integration of secondary arches 20:26 < mmcgrath> Ok, next topic then 20:26 < mmcgrath> #topic Search Engine 20:26 -!- zodbot changed the topic of #fedora-meeting to: Search Engine (Meeting topic: Infrastructure) 20:26 < mmcgrath> a-k: hit me! 20:26 < a-k> #link http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/Search 20:26 < |pitr|> heh - I lost connection - it seams that ath9k dev's still have things to do ;) 20:27 < dgilmore> mmcgrath: i have a bunch of dogtag packages to review on the pki side of things 20:27 -!- llaumgui_ [n=llaumgui(a)lns-bzn-51f-81-56-136-221.adsl.proxad.net] has joined #fedora-meeting 20:27 < a-k> huzaifas and I were thinking we'd have candidates to try out on a PT server in January 20:27 < a-k> Nothing has blown us away yet, but we should have worked through most of the candidates by then 20:27 < a-k> If I can make Apache Solr work, it sounds really nice from the docs 20:27 < a-k> We'll have a better handle on specific PT requirements by January 20:28 < a-k> I think that's about it. 20:28 < mmcgrath> dgilmore: yeah I forgot about that. 20:28 < mmcgrath> a-k: thanks for the update. 20:28 < smooge> pki? 20:28 < smooge> sorry.. will talk off chan 20:28 < mmcgrath> smooge: yeah our pki right now is very... ehh manual 20:28 < mmcgrath> and not fun to manage :) 20:29 < mmcgrath> Ok, and I think that's really all I had for the meeting 20:29 < mmcgrath> #topic Open Floor 20:29 -!- zodbot changed the topic of #fedora-meeting to: Open Floor (Meeting topic: Infrastructure) 20:29 < mmcgrath> anyone have anything they'd like to discuss? 20:29 < mmcgrath> any new members want to make themselves known? 20:29 < jcollie> our first real f-talk meeting is under way... 20:29 < dgilmore> smooge: public key infrastructure 20:29 < dgilmore> jcollie: its going ok 20:29 < |pitr|> I'm new 20:30 < abadger1999> |pitr|: Welcome. What would you like to do? 20:30 < abadger1999> :-) 20:30 < smooge> hi |pitr| welcome to Sysadmins Anonymous 20:30 < |pitr|> I've sent email 3 days ago on fedora-infrastructure 20:30 < ricky> Welcome! 20:31 < |pitr|> I'm not quite sure yet 20:31 -!- llaumgui_ [n=llaumgui(a)lns-bzn-51f-81-56-136-221.adsl.proxad.net] has quit Client Quit 20:31 < |pitr|> I wor as a some kind sysadmin at r&d department of my company 20:31 < |pitr|> I'm good at troubleshooting 20:32 < mmcgrath> |pitr|: have you seen - https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/report/1 20:32 < mmcgrath> it has a good list of things we're currently working on. 20:32 < |pitr|> right now I'm reading what I can find and trying to follow the discusion 20:32 < |pitr|> no 20:33 < mmcgrath> |pitr|: well welcome, also do hang out in #fedora-admin, that's the business end of the group :) 20:33 < |pitr|> thx 20:33 < mmcgrath> Ok, if no one has anything else to discuss we'll close the meeting in 30s. 20:34 < mmcgrath> alrighty! 20:34 < mmcgrath> #endmeeting 20:34 -!- zodbot changed the topic of #fedora-meeting to: Channel is used by various Fedora groups and committees for their regular meetings | Note that meetings often get logged | For questions about using Fedora please ask in #fedora | See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/FedoraMeetingChannel for meeting schedule 20:34 < zodbot> Meeting ended Thu Nov 19 20:34:51 2009 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . 20:34 < zodbot> Minutes: http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2009-11-19/fedora-meeting.2… 20:34 < zodbot> Minutes (text): http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2009-11-19/fedora-meeting.2… 20:34 < zodbot> Log: http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2009-11-19/fedora-meeting.2…

1 0

Unfrozen!
by Mike McGrath 18 Nov '09

18 Nov '09

We are unfrozen. An excellent release as always, thanks to everyone who helped! -Mike

3 2

Introduction
by Piotr Kral 18 Nov '09

18 Nov '09

Hi My name is Piotr Kral. And I'd like to join Fedora community at general and fedora-infrastructure in particular since I'm a sysadmin myself. I'm learning/using Linux since about ten years. I started from Debian, but from several years I'm using Red Hat (from RHEL 3) in my company servers and Fedora on my desktop. I was able to gain an RHCE title and I'm a great Linux enthusiast (I've set up a first Linux production server in my company and now we have about 200 off them, mostly by my design). I feel that I must do something for fedora community to be able to evolve myself and to give back at least a small thing from me. I hope You can give me some guides what I should do next and I hope I'll be able to join You on next thursday at 20:00 UTC on #fedora-meeting. Kind regards Piotr Kral

2 1

FWD: [Fedora-freemedia-list] SHA1 vs SHA256...
by susmit shannigrahi 18 Nov '09

18 Nov '09

Can you please help with this? Thanks. ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Jeff Shepherd <hummdis(a)gmail.com> Date: Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 1:07 PM Subject: [Fedora-freemedia-list] SHA1 vs SHA256... To: fedora-freemedia-list(a)redhat.com Is it just me, or are the checksums to verify the Fedora 12 discs incorrectly listed here on these pages: https://fedoraproject.org/static/checksums/Fedora-12-i386-CHECKSUM https://fedoraproject.org/static/checksums/Fedora-12-x86_64-CHECKSUM The page says that it's SHA1, but my SHA1 looks nothing like those and the SHA256 matches exactly. I've verified this on Windows & Fedora 11. At first I thought I had a bad download, so I downloaded again, only to find that these are not SHA1 checksums, they're SHA256. Can anyone else confirm? Can anyone shed light as to why the page says SHA1 when it's SHA256? How do we go about getting this corrected? Thanks! Jeff -- Jeff Shepherd hummdis(a)gmail.com Scott Adams - "Men live in a fantasy world. I know this because I am one, and I actually receive my mail there." Ogden Nash - "The trouble with a kitten is that when it grows up, it's always a cat." -- Fedora-freemedia-list mailing list Fedora-freemedia-list(a)redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-freemedia-list -- Regards, Susmit. ============================================= http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/user:susmit ============================================= Sent from Calcutta, WB, India

5 5

PackageDB Update
by Toshio Kuratomi 17 Nov '09

17 Nov '09

Tomorrow, after change freeze is over, I'll be updating the PackageDB to 0.4.1. This is a bugfix release so I don't expect any problems but you never know :-) -Toshio

1 0

Change Request: Force SSL for /keys and /verify
by Ricky Zhou 17 Nov '09

17 Nov '09

Thanks to Sijis for pointing this need out. diff --git a/modules/fedora-web/files/redirects.conf b/modules/fedora-web/files/redirects.conf index a88613f..a679ebd 100644 --- a/modules/fedora-web/files/redirects.conf +++ b/modules/fedora-web/files/redirects.conf @@ -9,3 +9,8 @@ RewriteRule ^/([^/]+/)?legal/trademarks/guidelines$ http://fedoraproject.org/wik # Comment this out when there is a prerelease available #RewriteRule ^(/.*)?/get-prerelease$ $1/get-fedora [R=302] + +RewriteEngine On +RewriteCond %{HTTPS} off +RewriteRule ^/([^/]+/)?(keys|verify)$ https://%{HTTP_HOST}%{REQUEST_URI} [R=301,L] + Thanks, Ricky

4 3

[PATCH] supybot-fedora: add mirroradmins command
by Matt Domsch 17 Nov '09

17 Nov '09

>From dac6dbbaef266c668e32249c9d15f766b65c00d2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Matt Domsch <Matt_Domsch(a)dell.com> Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 23:53:04 -0600 Subject: [PATCH] add mirroradmins command --- plugin.py | 13 +++++++++++++ 1 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/plugin.py b/plugin.py index b36a050..d40683b 100644 --- a/plugin.py +++ b/plugin.py @@ -373,6 +373,19 @@ class Fedora(callbacks.Plugin): irc.reply(string.encode('utf-8')) wikilink = wrap(wikilink, ['text']) + def mirroradmins(self, irc, msg, args, hostname): + """<hostname> + + Return MirrorManager list of FAS usernames which administer <hostname>. + <hostname> must be the FQDN of the host.""" + url = "https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mirrormanager/mirroradmins?tg_format=json&h…" + hostname + result = self._load_json(url)['values'] + if len(result) == 0: + irc.reply('Hostname "%s" not found' % hostname) + return + string = 'Mirror Admins of %s: ' + ' '.join(result) + irc.reply(string.encode('utf-8')) + mirroradmins = wrap(mirroradmins) Class = Fedora -- 1.6.5.2 Once I can push a new MM that implements this interface. -- Matt Domsch Technology Strategist, Dell Office of the CTO linux.dell.com & www.dell.com/linux

1 1

[PATCH] Enabling wiki cache for ticket 1795
by Mike McGrath 16 Nov '09

16 Nov '09

--- modules/fedora-web/files/cache.conf | 2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/modules/fedora-web/files/cache.conf b/modules/fedora-web/files/cache.conf index fdd4f9e..2f11448 100644 --- a/modules/fedora-web/files/cache.conf +++ b/modules/fedora-web/files/cache.conf @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ <IfModule mod_disk_cache.c> CacheRoot /srv/cache/mod_cache # Disabled for normal use, to be enabled on release days - #CacheEnable disk /wiki/ + CacheEnable disk /wiki/ CacheEnable disk /static/ CacheEnable disk /wiki/Image: -- 1.6.2.5

3 4

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

infrastructure November 2009