On Fri., 28 Apr. 2017 at 6:05 pm, Vít Ondruch <vondruch@redhat.com> wrote:

Dne 28.4.2017 v 07:34 Chenxiong Qi napsal(a):
> On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 2:54 PM, Pierre-Yves Chibon <pingou@pingoured.fr> wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 11:29:28AM +0800, Chenxiong Qi wrote:
>>>
>>> On 04/25/2017 10:23 PM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
>>>> (adding the releng list on CC, please keep the reply on the infra list)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Hi Everyone,
>>>>
>>>> Following up on the thread about pagure on the top of dist-git started a
>>>> few days ago Ralph Bean, Matthew Prahl and I had a quick meeting just a few
>>>> minutes ago about the future of pkgdb.
>>>>
>>> Will pkgdb go away? It looks Pagure would be a data store combining package
>>> repositories and pkgdb data together. From my point of view, pkgdb could
>>> still sit between packagers and Pagure rather than exposing lower level data
>>> directly as an interface of package data (whatever it comes from Pagure or
>>> PDC) to packagers and existing tools like pkgdb-cli. If anything of my
>>> understand about current pkgdb is not accurate, just scratch my thought :)
>> The idea is indeed to retire pkgdb. However, I'm not sure I follow why you would
>> prefer to keep it and what you don't like about dropping it. Could you expand
>> your thoughts a little more?
> I thought "pkgdb" would become a main interface for anyone who wants
> to lookup package information without need to interact with Pagure or
> PDC directly, meanwhile we can keep using current terms about packages
> e.g. main contacts, that would be easier for anyone to get involved
> and start to contribute.

I support this. For me is the pkgdb entry point. If I want to know
something about package, I'm going to take a look into pkgdb. I'll be
missing its simple UI.

Vít

There is also the packages app that provides information on packages

https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/kernel