Hi all, we need to delete the /var/lib/transifex-client/.tx/config file on bapp, which should execute directly syncTranslations.sh on puppet (fedora-web/files), if not it gets executed at next cron-job. Doing so re-creates all transifex resources, included the new getfedora.org resource, in /var/tmp/po_dir/, needed to pull pos automatically once a day. The procedure has been already tested on app01.stg and worked as expected.
Actually we are pulling the pos manually, but we'd need to be sure this automatic process works smooth before releasing F21.
Any +1's or concerns? Thank you.
On Sat, 29 Nov 2014 10:36:23 +0100 Robert Mayr robyduck@fedoraproject.org wrote:
Hi all, we need to delete the /var/lib/transifex-client/.tx/config file on bapp, which should execute directly syncTranslations.sh on puppet (fedora-web/files), if not it gets executed at next cron-job. Doing so re-creates all transifex resources, included the new getfedora.org resource, in /var/tmp/po_dir/, needed to pull pos automatically once a day. The procedure has been already tested on app01.stg and worked as expected.
Actually we are pulling the pos manually, but we'd need to be sure this automatic process works smooth before releasing F21.
Any +1's or concerns?
Sure, we could do this, but we are going to need to do a bunch of other things to get getfedora.org enabled in production, so perhaps we should just wait and do it at the same time?
kevin
2014-11-30 18:40 GMT+01:00 Kevin Fenzi kevin@scrye.com:
On Sat, 29 Nov 2014 10:36:23 +0100 Robert Mayr robyduck@fedoraproject.org wrote:
Hi all, we need to delete the /var/lib/transifex-client/.tx/config file on bapp, which should execute directly syncTranslations.sh on puppet (fedora-web/files), if not it gets executed at next cron-job. Doing so re-creates all transifex resources, included the new getfedora.org resource, in /var/tmp/po_dir/, needed to pull pos automatically once a day. The procedure has been already tested on app01.stg and worked as expected.
Actually we are pulling the pos manually, but we'd need to be sure this automatic process works smooth before releasing F21.
Any +1's or concerns?
Sure, we could do this, but we are going to need to do a bunch of other things to get getfedora.org enabled in production, so perhaps we should just wait and do it at the same time?
kevin
infrastructure mailing list infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure
Yes we can, it's just that the stg website actually is not pulling the po files automatically from TX to give translators the possibility to look at their changes and the context of the strings. I'm doing this manually right now and can also continue. Thanks.
On Sun, 30 Nov 2014 20:04:19 +0100 Robert Mayr robyduck@fedoraproject.org wrote:
Yes we can, it's just that the stg website actually is not pulling the po files automatically from TX to give translators the possibility to look at their changes and the context of the strings. I'm doing this manually right now and can also continue. Thanks.
The stg website should be all on app01.stg... and not frozen. You should be able to do any changes you like to it. It's bapp02 (production) thats frozen.
kevin
2014-12-01 15:28 GMT+01:00 Kevin Fenzi kevin@scrye.com:
On Sun, 30 Nov 2014 20:04:19 +0100 Robert Mayr robyduck@fedoraproject.org wrote:
Yes we can, it's just that the stg website actually is not pulling the po files automatically from TX to give translators the possibility to look at their changes and the context of the strings. I'm doing this manually right now and can also continue. Thanks.
The stg website should be all on app01.stg... and not frozen. You should be able to do any changes you like to it. It's bapp02 (production) thats frozen.
kevin
I'm renewing this freeze break request as getfedora is now also in production and we need to do the same as for staging (delete /var/lib/transifex-client/.tx/confg). So I'm asking for +1s again. Thanks.
On Wed, 3 Dec 2014 16:50:06 +0100 Robert Mayr robyduck@fedoraproject.org wrote:
I'm renewing this freeze break request as getfedora is now also in production and we need to do the same as for staging (delete /var/lib/transifex-client/.tx/confg). So I'm asking for +1s again. Thanks.
Yeah, +1 here. Makes perfect sense now that we are live in production.
kevin
+1 before I get on plane On Dec 3, 2014 8:51 AM, "Kevin Fenzi" kevin@scrye.com wrote:
On Wed, 3 Dec 2014 16:50:06 +0100 Robert Mayr robyduck@fedoraproject.org wrote:
I'm renewing this freeze break request as getfedora is now also in production and we need to do the same as for staging (delete /var/lib/transifex-client/.tx/confg). So I'm asking for +1s again. Thanks.
Yeah, +1 here. Makes perfect sense now that we are live in production.
kevin
infrastructure mailing list infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure
2014-12-03 16:57 GMT+01:00 Stephen John Smoogen smooge@gmail.com:
+1 before I get on plane On Dec 3, 2014 8:51 AM, "Kevin Fenzi" kevin@scrye.com wrote:
On Wed, 3 Dec 2014 16:50:06 +0100 Robert Mayr robyduck@fedoraproject.org wrote:
I'm renewing this freeze break request as getfedora is now also in production and we need to do the same as for staging (delete /var/lib/transifex-client/.tx/confg). So I'm asking for +1s again. Thanks.
Yeah, +1 here. Makes perfect sense now that we are live in production.
kevin
infrastructure mailing list infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure
infrastructure mailing list infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure
Ok, done, thank you! PO files are pulled and config has been re-created with the new getfedora resource. Cheers.
infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
-
Kevin Fenzi -
Robert Mayr -
Stephen John Smoogen