This one's an oops, probably on me. I happened to notice proxy1 is an x86_64 box. We have two options.
1) double it's ram
2) rebuild it as x86
I'd prefer to do 2 since the release slipped again and we've generally got time for it. The concern is the boxes are tuned for i686 with 4G of ram and don't generally like to operate if either of those change.
-Mike
On Fri, 29 May 2009, Mike McGrath wrote:
This one's an oops, probably on me. I happened to notice proxy1 is an x86_64 box. We have two options.
double it's ram
rebuild it as x86
I'd prefer to do 2 since the release slipped again and we've generally got time for it. The concern is the boxes are tuned for i686 with 4G of ram and don't generally like to operate if either of those change.
Side note on this... it's late on a Friday. I'm not going to risk this going wrong for the weekend so I'll be doing it on Monday if approved.
-Mike
On 2009-05-29 04:31:18 PM, Mike McGrath wrote:
This one's an oops, probably on me. I happened to notice proxy1 is an x86_64 box. We have two options.
double it's ram
rebuild it as x86
I'd prefer to do 2 since the release slipped again and we've generally got time for it. The concern is the boxes are tuned for i686 with 4G of ram and don't generally like to operate if either of those change.
+1 to 2
Thanks, Ricky
On 05/29/2009 02:32 PM, Ricky Zhou wrote:
On 2009-05-29 04:31:18 PM, Mike McGrath wrote:
This one's an oops, probably on me. I happened to notice proxy1 is an x86_64 box. We have two options.
double it's ram
rebuild it as x86
I'd prefer to do 2 since the release slipped again and we've generally got time for it. The concern is the boxes are tuned for i686 with 4G of ram and don't generally like to operate if either of those change.
+1 to 2
+1 to 2
-Toshio
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 11:31 PM, Mike McGrath mmcgrath@redhat.com wrote:
This one's an oops, probably on me. I happened to notice proxy1 is an x86_64 box. We have two options.
double it's ram
rebuild it as x86
I'd prefer to do 2 since the release slipped again and we've generally got time for it. The concern is the boxes are tuned for i686 with 4G of ram and don't generally like to operate if either of those change.
+1 for 1
+1 for 1
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 6:31 PM, Mike McGrath mmcgrath@redhat.com wrote:
This one's an oops, probably on me. I happened to notice proxy1 is an x86_64 box. We have two options.
double it's ram
rebuild it as x86
I'd prefer to do 2 since the release slipped again and we've generally got time for it. The concern is the boxes are tuned for i686 with 4G of ram and don't generally like to operate if either of those change.
-Mike
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
On Fri, 29 May 2009, Itamar Reis Peixoto wrote:
+1 for 1
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 6:31 PM, Mike McGrath mmcgrath@redhat.com wrote:
This one's an oops, probably on me. I happened to notice proxy1 is an x86_64 box. We have two options.
double it's ram
rebuild it as x86
I'd prefer to do 2 since the release slipped again and we've generally got time for it. The concern is the boxes are tuned for i686 with 4G of ram and don't generally like to operate if either of those change.
I should note that if we do 1) it'd only be until after the release at which time 2 would be done.
-Mike
infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
-
itamar -
Mike McGrath -
Ricky Zhou -
SmootherFrOgZ -
Toshio Kuratomi