It would be helpful to contributors and users alike if Fedora IoT had a single place folks could submit bugs. We discussed this briefly in the meeting this morning and decided to take it to the mailing list. There are a few options.
1. Bugzilla bugs Advantage: it's the place that other Fedora bugs live. This means it's easy to reassign bugs that aren't strictly IoT-related (e.g. kernel bugs) to the appropriate component. Disadvantage: it's not exactly user-friendly
2. Pagure issues Advantage: it looks a lot like git forges that people might already be used to. Can refer to issues in commits when things are fixed Disadvantage: bugs that belong to other components would need to be manually moved. It also requires a FAS account
3. Taiga issues Advantage: issues live near the planned work Disadvantage: Requires a FAS account
I like option 1 the best. In fact, I think it would be pretty great if all our Editions had a component that was the end-user interface and contributors moved the issues to the right place. But I'm not the one who will be doing much/any of the work, so what does everyone else think?
Hey!! Even I believe Bugzilla is a good option, as a person is most likely to face many other problems along with the IOT. Also I believe, the UI doesn’t really matter if we get the maximum solution in one environment.
I don’t think my opinion should really weighs, as I haven’t contributed anything to this. But surely, I’m looking forward to do.
Anuj Jain
On Thu, 4 Jul 2019 at 2:57 AM, Ben Cotton bcotton@redhat.com wrote:
It would be helpful to contributors and users alike if Fedora IoT had a single place folks could submit bugs. We discussed this briefly in the meeting this morning and decided to take it to the mailing list. There are a few options.
- Bugzilla bugs
Advantage: it's the place that other Fedora bugs live. This means it's easy to reassign bugs that aren't strictly IoT-related (e.g. kernel bugs) to the appropriate component. Disadvantage: it's not exactly user-friendly
- Pagure issues
Advantage: it looks a lot like git forges that people might already be used to. Can refer to issues in commits when things are fixed Disadvantage: bugs that belong to other components would need to be manually moved. It also requires a FAS account
- Taiga issues
Advantage: issues live near the planned work Disadvantage: Requires a FAS account
I like option 1 the best. In fact, I think it would be pretty great if all our Editions had a component that was the end-user interface and contributors moved the issues to the right place. But I'm not the one who will be doing much/any of the work, so what does everyone else think?
-- Ben Cotton He / Him / His Fedora Program Manager Red Hat TZ=America/Indiana/Indianapolis _______________________________________________ IoT mailing list -- iot@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to iot-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/iot@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Wed, 3 Jul 2019 at 22:39, Ben Cotton bcotton@redhat.com wrote:
It would be helpful to contributors and users alike if Fedora IoT had a single place folks could submit bugs. We discussed this briefly in the meeting this morning and decided to take it to the mailing list. There are a few options.
- Bugzilla bugs
Advantage: it's the place that other Fedora bugs live. This means it's easy to reassign bugs that aren't strictly IoT-related (e.g. kernel bugs) to the appropriate component. Disadvantage: it's not exactly user-friendly
- Pagure issues
Advantage: it looks a lot like git forges that people might already be used to. Can refer to issues in commits when things are fixed Disadvantage: bugs that belong to other components would need to be manually moved. It also requires a FAS account
- Taiga issues
Advantage: issues live near the planned work Disadvantage: Requires a FAS account
I like option 1 the best. In fact, I think it would be pretty great if all our Editions had a component that was the end-user interface and contributors moved the issues to the right place. But I'm not the one who will be doing much/any of the work, so what does everyone else think?
Hi,
I think using Bugzilla might be the best place, due to the number of bugs we'd probably need to move over to other components, and the fact that Pagure and Taiga issue tracking would require many custom fields to keep track of different components (upstream bug links, etc) in a structured fashion.
(I also don't think Bugzilla is that user-unfriendly. But that might just me.)
The consensus on the thread and in IRC seems to be that Bugzilla is our best choice. I'll create the component by the end of the week.
Hi everyone,
There is now an 'IoT' Bugzilla component: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?component=IoT&product=Fedora
Be the first to file a bug! I have Peter set as the default assignee.