java-devel September 2006

java-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

21 participants
15 discussions

PyDev Eclipse Plugin
by Tim Lauridsen 28 Sep '06

28 Sep '06

Anybody know the state of PyDev for Fedora Eclipse 3.2. Does there exist some test editions or someting, i would be very nice to do some python development in Eclipse again in FC6/Rawhide. Tim

2 1

For j-Interop(Non-Native Java - COM Bridge) Developers
by Vikram Roopchand 24 Sep '06

24 Sep '06

Hello All, New Version 1.05(a) released:- 1) New Feature: Complete support for Manipulating Windows registry in a non native way. All create/read/update/delete operations supported. Please check the WinReg package. 2) New Feature: For inproc servers like DLLs and OCXs , and auto register feature has been provided, using this flag in JISystem\JIClsid\JIProgID class can result in the library making all the registry related changes required to run any Inproc server. It is done on the fly. Beta will be released next week. If anyone has any feature request, they can send the same to me till mid next week. Thanks to all developers for trying j-Interop. best regards, Vikram

1 0

FC6 Release Notes for java
by Anthony Green 22 Sep '06

22 Sep '06

Help... the deadline for changes to the release notes is this Saturday, midnight UTC. Here are the current notes: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Docs/Beats/Java What else should we mention? Also, will libgcj be a separate SRPM in FC6? If so, is this still the right file name?: /usr/share/doc/gcc-4.1.1/README.libgcjwebplugin.so AG

2 1

Fedora Extras submission - classpath-0.92
by Paul F. Johnson 20 Sep '06

20 Sep '06

Hi, This is my first java package submitted to fedora extras and it's been suggested on #fedora-java that this would be the best place to talk about it. Please remember that though I've submitted quite a lot of packages for various languages to FE, this is my first java one so if I seem kinda dumb or ask blindingly obvious questions, this is the reason. If you point your browsers to BZ#207077 you will see that I've submitted GNU classpath-0.92 for inclusion. The discussion on #fedora-java is that libgcj is roughly equal to a version of classpath. However, when I've come to compile ikvm (already in FE, though as a compiled binary only) or Limewire, libgcj can't hack it, but classpath-0.92 just did the business and everything compiled. Am I widdling into the wind by submitting this or is libgcj just that bit too far from classpath-0.92? Second to this is a packaging problem. Most of classpath goes straight into %{_libdir}, but two files are directed to /usr/lib (a logging and a security file). Is this the correct behaviour, or should I patch to ensure everything goes to the correct %{_libdir}? TTFN Paul -- "Der einzige Weg, Leute zu kontrollieren ist sie anzulügen" - L. Ron "Ich kann kein Science-Fiction schreiben" Hubbard; Lügner, Betrüger, Fixer und Wohltäter zu niemandem

4 6

[Fwd: Re: [fedora-java] FOP, gcj, classpath, oh my!]
by Karsten Wade 15 Sep '06

15 Sep '06

FYI, we have a need for some help in compiling FOP with gcj. This is a prerequisite to getting FOP support in xmlto. For details from Tommy, see below. thx - Karsten -------- Forwarded Message -------- From: Tommy Reynolds <Tommy.Reynolds(a)MegaCoder.com> Reply-To: For participants of the Documentation Project <fedora-docs-list(a)redhat.com> To: fedora-docs-list(a)redhat.com Subject: Re: [fedora-java] FOP, gcj, classpath, oh my! Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 07:16:47 -0700 Uttered Karsten Wade <kwade(a)redhat.com>, spake thus: > Tommy - is the barrier to having make run the Java tools the lack of > support in xmlto? If we're this close, maybe we can get xmlto updated > in the devel tree (rawhide) right away. Bonus would be if we could see > all of this pushed eventually into updates to FCs 5 and 6. Karsten, I've had XMLTO working with FOP, and producing PDF's, for quite a while now. As Paul W Frields as pointed out, the PDF's look awful because we need work on the stylesheet. As you probably remember, I sent the appropriate XMLTO patches for FOP to Tim Waugh many, many moons ago. AIUI, his reluctance to add them officially has been mostly that FOP wasn't free. The FOP dependancy in the XMLTO RPM would be endlessly confusing. If needed I could mangle the patches to use either FOP or passivetex so as not to break things while our FOP implementation matures, with the default renderer being passivetex. These are just minor details. I lack the java-fu to compile FOP using gcj; if someone could do it for me, and maybe send me the patches, I could provide Tim a with a complete package. In summary: 1) If we could get someone to provide patches to compile FOP using gcj, I could do the RPM-fu. 2) Having hopes of a FOP rpm, I can update the XMLTO rpm to utilize it. 3) Present Tim Waugh with a fait acompli. I'm not sure that #3 is sufficient to get the updates into rawhide, but it's a necessary step. Cheers -- fedora-docs-list mailing list fedora-docs-list(a)redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list -- Karsten Wade, RHCE, 108 Editor ^ Fedora Documentation Project Sr. Developer Relations Mgr. | fedoraproject.org/wiki/DocsProject quaid.108.redhat.com | gpg key: AD0E0C41 ////////////////////////////////// \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\

1 0

FOP, gcj, classpath, oh my!
by Karsten Wade 15 Sep '06

15 Sep '06

Can someone give fedora-docs-list an update about our ability to put out a 100% free, gcj-compiled DocBook toolchain? I've totally lost track of where this is at or who was working on it. Thanks - Karsten -- Karsten Wade, RHCE, 108 Editor ^ Fedora Documentation Project Sr. Developer Relations Mgr. | fedoraproject.org/wiki/DocsProject quaid.108.redhat.com | gpg key: AD0E0C41 ////////////////////////////////// \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\

5 6

Fedora Eclipse 3.2 for FC-5
by Benjamin Konrath 13 Sep '06

13 Sep '06

Hey y'all, I whipped up a little test yum repo with Eclipse 3.2 for FC-5 (i386 and x86_64): % cat /etc/yum.repos.d/eclipse.repo [eclipse] name=Eclipse 3.2 for FC-5 baseurl=http://bagu.org/eclipse/3.2-FC-5/ enabled=1 gpgcheck=0 If you want to use this you'll have to remove all of the non-SDK Eclipse rpms because of version requirements. We may fix this in the near future. This is only a test repo to give a little preview of 3.2 running with GCJ for those of you who are not running rawhide. If people think it's a good idea, we don't mind officially releasing 3.2 and accompanying plugins into an FC-5 update. Any thoughts on this would be appreciated. Cheers, Ben

3 3

How to acquire the memory status of a system with java
by arun sadanandan 13 Sep '06

13 Sep '06

hi, I am doing a project in Enterprise java for developing a "parallel procesing platform".During the development stages of this I have stucked with the problem how to detect the present load status of each of the machines in the network with java coding.Or is there any better alternatives for the remote load analysis.I would like to develope it independent of the client's OS ie why I prefer the way to be purely java oriented. Also I am facing another problem with detecting which are the machines currently alive in the network.Is there any solution either purely java or by using any other tools that can be implemented via java. If any body could help me, It will be a greate favour for me. Arun P sadanandan A Final year gratuation student in computer science --------------------------------- Talk is cheap. Use Yahoo! Messenger to make PC-to-Phone calls. Great rates starting at 1¢/min.

2 1

subclipse svn checkout fails.
by Tim Lauridsen 13 Sep '06

13 Sep '06

Hi. I have installed the latest eclipse and eclipse-subclipse on my rawhide system. (FC6T2 + Rawhide update) The i try to checkout out a svn project from https://svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/yumex/trunk. I get the following error: An internal error occured during: "Fetching Childred of https://svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/yumex/trunk" 1.4 Methods not enabled. I have no problems doing a checkout on the commandline (svn co https://svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/yumex/trunk) *Installed eclipse & subversion packages:* [tim@localhost ~]$ rpm -qa | grep eclipse eclipse-ecj-3.2.0-5.fc6 eclipse-subclipse-book-1.1.5-2.fc6 eclipse-platform-3.2.0-5.fc6 eclipse-rcp-3.2.0-5.fc6 eclipse-subclipse-1.1.5-2.fc6 [tim@localhost ~]$ rpm -qa | grep svn javasvn-1.1.0-0.3.beta4.fc6 [tim@localhost ~]$ rpm -qa | grep subversion subversion-javahl-1.3.2-6 subversion-1.3.2-6 Anybody have any ideas about what goes wrong. Shall i make a bugzilla against eclipse-subclipse or is the problem releated to eclipse ??? Tim Lauridsen

2 1

Eclipse TPTP
by Joe Desbonnet 12 Sep '06

12 Sep '06

I am having difficulty getting the Eclipse 3.2 TPTP recording feature working on Fedora. It "just works" on Windows with IE browser. I get IWAT0248E The agent controller is not available on host localhost. Make sure that: * the agent controller is installed * the agent controller is configured to communicate with your machine * you have the corrent host name and port number for the agent controller I tried downloading a native Agent Controller -- but it seems FC5 has the wong libstdc++ library. However it my understanding that the native version should not be necessary. Interestingly I get similar errors if I try using to use the Firefox browser on Windows. Is there any magic to getting this to work with Fedora + Firefox? I'm using the Sun JDK (1.5.0_07). Joe.

1 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

java-devel September 2006