java-devel June 2007

java-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

5 participants
5 discussions

New review: QuickREx eclipse plugin
by alcapcom 29 Jun '07

29 Jun '07

Hi *, Yesterday I send QuickREx Eclipse plugin for review, the review is there -> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246138. I have based the specfile on the eclipse-mylar and the eclipse-changelog specfile. At this time, Bastian Bergerhoff (the upstream guy) don't provide a feature plugin but he would fix that for the next release. He will provide an archive with complete sources + the features plugins (I have send him that one that I have use to build the plugin). He was really happy to know that someone was working to packaging him plugin for a Linux distribution an thus was really open to fix some little trouble with the sources, a sympathetic guy. Some of you know that I'm working on the specfile plugin, please guys help me to review this plugin so that I can use this beautiful specfile plugin ;-) PS: I have disable jregex and jakarta-regexp API for the main reason that they was not Fedora package for both of them and that these functionality don't give anything more that the two other API (the JDK and ORO). Have a nice day, Alphonse

1 0

Eclipse 3.3RC4 on F7
by Benjamin Konrath 19 Jun '07

19 Jun '07

Hi, I just whipped up some i386 test packages of Eclipse 3.3RC4 for F7. You can install these packages by adding this repo to /etc/yum.repo.d/ and then running 'yum --enablerepo=eclipse install eclipse-sdk': [eclipse] name=Eclipse 3.3 for F7 baseurl=http://www.bagu.org/eclipse/3.3-F7/ enabled=0 gpgcheck=0 These packages aren't officially supported but I would still like to know if you find any problems. Thanks, Ben

2 2

Review Request: svnkit - Pure Java Subversion client library
by Benjamin Konrath 14 Jun '07

14 Jun '07

Hi, Could someone re-start this stalled review?: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227500 Thanks, Ben

1 0

Using jpackage 1.7 on Fedora 7
by Mary Ellen Foster 11 Jun '07

11 Jun '07

If I enable jpackage 1.7 on a default install of Fedora 7 (with all the Java-development stuff enabled) and try a "yum update", several things fail. Here's the final output: --> Running transaction check ---> Package xml-commons.noarch 0:1.3.03-10jpp set to be updated ---> Package geronimo-specs-poms.noarch 0:1.1-4jpp set to be updated ---> Package lucene.noarch 0:1.9.1-1jpp set to be updated ---> Package jdom.i386 0:1.0-4jpp.1 set to be updated ---> Package geronimo-specs.noarch 0:1.1-4jpp set to be updated ---> Package avalon-framework.i386 0:4.1.4-2jpp.14.fc7 set to be updated ---> Package juddi.noarch 0:0.9-0.rc4.2jpp set to be updated --> Processing Dependency: lucene = 1.4.3-1jpp.18 for package: lucene-devel --> Processing Dependency: geronimo-specs = 1.0-0.M2.2jpp.12 for package: geronimo-specs-compat --> Finished Dependency Resolution Error: Missing Dependency: /usr/bin/rebuild-security-providers is needed by package java-1.5.0-gcj Error: Missing Dependency: geronimo-specs = 1.0-0.M2.2jpp.12 is needed by package geronimo-specs-compat Error: Missing Dependency: lucene = 1.4.3-1jpp.18 is needed by package lucene-devel rebuild-security-providers is in the Fedora jpackage-utils and not the JPackage one (and the Jpackage developers indicate that this is possibly a bad judgement for the Fedora package); geronimo-specs-compat is a dependency of mysql-connector-java and, hence, jython and eclipse-pydev; while Fedora lucene got split a while back into lucene and lucene-devel and JPackage didn't follow suit. I tried working around this a bit, but especially the jpackage-utils dependency seems a bit annoying. (This may have to do with the current SRPM-as-noarch-RPM problem in the JPackage repository that means you need to --exclude things twice to get them really excluded.) Is the jpackage-utils thing something I should bugzilla at redhat? Should we worry about the rest of this? MEF -- Mary Ellen Foster http://homepages.inf.ed.ac.uk/mef/ -- Mary Ellen Foster http://homepages.inf.ed.ac.uk/mef/

1 0

JNI Libs best practice?
by Stefan Held 04 Jun '07

04 Jun '07

Hi, in my current efforts for packaging Dbus-Java and libmatthew-java i have some jni libs to deploy. I've asked on #fedora-devel but got 3 different statements about the install directory for such libs. What is the current standard for this files? -- Stefan Held VI has only 2 Modes: obi unixkiste org The first one is for beeping all the time, IRCNet: Obi_Wan the second destroys the text. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- perl -e'map{print pack c,($|++?1:13)+ord,select$,,$,,$,,$|}split//,ESEL.$/' --------------------------------------------------------------------------- GPG-Keyprint = EAF2 6A65 D102 F2DB 4970 2A67 455B 98F2 572C 3FA9

2 1

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

java-devel June 2007