java-devel April 2008

java-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

9 participants
9 discussions

eclipse 3.4 M6, CDT from CVS, Autotools from CVS... something to do.
by Leonardo Silveira 30 Apr '08

30 Apr '08

hi all after good people started to help me, the things started so get figured. in order to have a working CDT, i've needed the foolowing plugin-projects on my workspace: org.eclipse.cdt.core.linux.x86 org.eclipse.cdt.refactoring org.eclipse.cdt.sdk org.eclipse.cdt.core org.eclipse.cdt.core.linux org.eclipse.cdt.debug.core org.eclipse.cdt.debug.ui org.eclipse.cdt.launch org.eclipse.cdt.make.core org.eclipse.cdt.make.ui org.eclipse.cdt.managedbuilder.core org.eclipse.cdt.managedbuilder.gnu.ui org.eclipse.cdt.managedbuilder.ui org.eclipse.cdt.ui and it lauched flawlessly. later, i checkout'ed these projects from sources.redhat.com: com.redhat.eclipse.cdt.autotools.feature com.redhat.eclipse.cdt.autotools-docs com.redhat.eclipse.cdt.autotools com.redhat.eclipse.cdt.autotools.tests the plugin is recognized but with some issues: this was the first one: "The type org.eclipse.core.filesystem.IFileStore cannot be resolved. It is indirectly referenced from required .class files" class MakeGenerator.java, line 1056. after some search, ive figured that IFileStore is inside eclipse and cdt plugins uses it and don't have any issue. the fixup was a modification in the MANIFEST.MF, adding a property found inside another manifest, from org.eclipse.cdt.make.core. in the key Require-Bundle, that property is needed: org.eclipse.core.filesystem;bundle-version="1.2.0" but if it's added, 48 other errors inside automake will appear. i think that's because some change in cdt, since the main difference now is the previous error was about some not found class. this time are many "must implement" errors. i would like to get some advice, since i'm learning now about plugins, and also don't know what to do if i make some change there.

1 0

jpeg2000
by Orion Poplawski 25 Apr '08

25 Apr '08

Can someone enlighten me about the status of jpeg2000 support in Java? I see that there is a jj2000 implementation that does not appear to be packaged in Fedora. Should (can?) it be? Is there something else? I ask because I'm looking into packaging GRIBJava, and it appears to use a modified jj2000, but there was mention on their list about a native Java JPEG2000 interface coming. Thanks! -- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA/CoRA Division FAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane orion(a)cora.nwra.com Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.cora.nwra.com

1 0

eclipse automake plugin
by Leonardo Silveira 25 Apr '08

25 Apr '08

hello all. first, need to say, nice plugin, i'm experiencing it and there are much future. it seems to work fine under exotic configs, like Jrockit jvm and slackware 12. i would like to know if someone have a link for anonymous cvs access, i would like to see the source. thx for the nice work

2 1

Tomcat/Axis package?
by Rich Megginson 10 Apr '08

10 Apr '08

Is there a package that provides the $CATALINA_HOME/webapps/axis files and directories? Are there any guidelines about creating axis services using Tomcat on Fedora?

2 1

[Fwd: Summary of the 2008-04-08 Packaging Committee meeting]
by Andrew Overholt 09 Apr '08

09 Apr '08

FYI: "jpp" in release tag up for discussion again: -------- Forwarded Message -------- > From: Jason L Tibbitts III <tibbs(a)math.uh.edu> > To: fedora-devel-list(a)redhat.com > Subject: Summary of the 2008-04-08 Packaging Committee meeting > Date: 09 Apr 2008 11:36:30 -0500 > > Meeting minutes and full logs of the packaging committee meeting which > occurred on 2008-04-08 are online: > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Minutes > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Minutes20080408 > > [...] > > * Revisiting the jpackagage naming exception > * The original exception is at > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/JPackagePolicy; the > committee is revisiting the exception. > * The committee requests from the Java group "a list of information > as to why they need the jpp tag, specifically, how they're using > it, by May 8th." The committee will revisit the issue then. > * Accepted (5 - 0) > * Voting for: tibbs abadger1999 spot rdieter hansg

1 0

Dealing with LD_LIBRARY_PATH for a package using JNI
by Mary Ellen Foster 08 Apr '08

08 Apr '08

I'm currently working on enabling the "jpl" Java interface to the SWI Prolog (package is called "pl" in Fedora). This provides a bidirectional interface between Prolog and Java -- you can call Prolog from Java or (what I'm doing in my current project) call Java from Prolog. I'm attempting to follow the Java packaging guidelines for JNI-using projects and putting jpl.jar and libjpl.so into $LIBDIR/pl-jpl and patching files so that the libraries get loaded, and that's going well. One thing I'm not sure how to deal with: libjpl.so is linked against libjava.so and libjvm.so. On my machine, that means I need to set LD_LIBRARY_PATH to /usr/lib/jvm/java/jre/lib/i386:/usr/lib/jvm/java/jre/lib/i386/client before I run Prolog, and the same is probably the case if I wanted to use the Java-to-Prolog direction. Is this acceptable, or is there some other solution I should use here? Thanks for any suggestions, MEF -- Mary Ellen Foster -- http://homepages.inf.ed.ac.uk/mef/ Informatik 6: Robotics and Embedded Systems, Technische Universität München and ICCS, School of Informatics, University of Edinburgh

2 2

Java guidelines and JPackage sync
by Colin Walters 04 Apr '08

04 Apr '08

Now that the Java guidelines are approved, where are we on the status of merging in/with specs from JPackage? For example, JFreechart: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252115 How do we get changes made in the spec for Fedora reflected back into JPackage, and vice versa? Was there any thoughts on the plan to integrate JPackage more closely with the Fedora infrastructure, like CVS/koji?

2 1

Re: [fedora-java] Eclipse plugin building script
by Mat Booth 03 Apr '08

03 Apr '08

On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 6:57 PM, Andrew Overholt <overholt(a)redhat.com> wrote: > > On Thu, 2008-04-03 at 17:22 +0100, Mat Booth wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 2:16 PM, Andrew Overholt <overholt(a)redhat.com> wrote: > > > See attached for a better patch. > > Thanks. Note that I just updated rawhide to 3.3.2 so the patch *may* no > longer apply cleanly. Sorry if that's the case. > > No worries. > > > Did you want to just commit this? If you request commit on the eclipse > > > module in the account system, I'll grant it. > > > > > > > Thanks, but I'm not sure I can do this. I don't have an account in the > > system because I'm not yet sponsored. > > What's your username? > In FAS: mbooth Sorry if this is a silly question, I'm still new at this. Do I need to apply for the cvseclipse group in order to commit my patch? Just in case you are thinking about sponsoring me, you should know that since you last posted in my package review request (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426884) I've been reading through the packaging committee minutes and will update my packages according to the new guidelines as soon as I can. Regards, Mat -- Mat Booth www.matbooth.co.uk

1 0

Re: [fedora-java] Eclipse plugin building script
by Mat Booth 03 Apr '08

03 Apr '08

Nifty script. > A drawback is that we're calling copy-platform multiple times > for multiple-feature projects like Mylyn and the calls after the first > one all say "file exists" for the mkdir and ln -s calls. It should be fairly easy to change the copy-platform script to only generate the necessary directories and links if they don't already exist, shouldn't it? -- Mat Booth www.matbooth.co.uk

2 3

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

java-devel April 2008