java-sig-commits January 2014

java-sig-commits@lists.fedoraproject.org

15 participants
376 discussions

[Bug 958221] New: plexus-utils: directory traversal in org.codehaus.plexus.util.Expand
by Red Hat Bugzilla 08 May '16

08 May '16

Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=958221 Bug ID: 958221 Summary: plexus-utils: directory traversal in org.codehaus.plexus.util.Expand Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: plexus-utils Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Assignee: fnasser(a)redhat.com Reporter: fweimer(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fnasser(a)redhat.com, java-sig-commits(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, mizdebsk(a)redhat.com Blocks: 958220 Category: --- org.codehaus.plexus.util.Expand does not guard against directory traversal, but such protection is generally expected from unarchiving tools. I think the class should just be deprecated and removed because there do not appear to be any users left (not even a test case). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=hp1lhU9LQd&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 5

[Bug 1004916] New: Package doesn't provide a sysvinit script or systemd service unit
by Red Hat Bugzilla 28 Jan '16

28 Jan '16

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1004916 Bug ID: 1004916 Summary: Package doesn't provide a sysvinit script or systemd service unit Product: Fedora Version: 19 Component: activemq Severity: high Assignee: mspaulding06(a)gmail.com Reporter: skottler(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: agrimm(a)redhat.com, java-sig-commits(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, mspaulding06(a)gmail.com, tdawson(a)redhat.com Description of problem: activemq doesn't provide the necessary scripts/config files to start. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 0:5.6.0-5.fc19 How reproducible: Always. Steps to Reproduce: 1. yum install -y activemq activemq-core 2. try starting the service 3. note there is not a service unit This seems like a fairly major thing to be missing in the packages. Is there another package or metapackage that needs to be installed for it to work? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=IC3tNZ0uDP&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 15

[Bug 1018485] New: EclipseLink 2.5.1 is available
by Red Hat Bugzilla 04 Nov '15

04 Nov '15

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1018485 Bug ID: 1018485 Summary: EclipseLink 2.5.1 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: eclipselink Assignee: puntogil(a)libero.it Reporter: gerard(a)ryan.lt QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: java-sig-commits(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, puntogil(a)libero.it Description of problem: Latest release of eclipselink in rawhide & f20 is 2.4.2, and in f19 is 2.3.2. Eclipselink 2.5.1 was released in late September [0]. Since eclipselink 2.5.x is part of Kepler simultaneous release[1], and 2.5.1 came out with Kepler SR1, I wonder if we should have 2.5.1 everywhere we have eclipse 4.3.1 and other eclipse projects that came with SR1 release? I think we should have it for rawhide/f20, and maybe f19 too. [0] http://www.eclipse.org/eclipselink/releases/2.5.php [1] http://projects.eclipse.org/releases/kepler -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=GacQneKW2m&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 2

[Bug 1031260] New: maven-checkstyle-plugin-2.11 is available
by Red Hat Bugzilla 18 Oct '15

18 Oct '15

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1031260 Bug ID: 1031260 Summary: maven-checkstyle-plugin-2.11 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: maven-checkstyle-plugin Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: SpikeFedora(a)gmail.com Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: java-sig-commits(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, SpikeFedora(a)gmail.com Latest upstream release: 2.11 Current version/release in Fedora Rawhide: 2.10-2.fc20 URL: http://repo2.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/maven/plugins/maven-checkstyle-plu… Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=axfoPunUlf&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 8

[Bug 991956] New: activemq: FTBFS in rawhide
by Red Hat Bugzilla 06 Oct '15

06 Oct '15

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=991956 Bug ID: 991956 Summary: activemq: FTBFS in rawhide Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: activemq Assignee: mspaulding06(a)gmail.com Reporter: dennis(a)ausil.us QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: agrimm(a)redhat.com, java-sig-commits(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, mspaulding06(a)gmail.com, tdawson(a)redhat.com Blocks: 991858 Your package activemq failed to build from source in current rawhide. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5696116 Build logs: root.log: http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/work/tasks/6116/5696116/root.log build.log: http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/work/tasks/6116/5696116/build.log state.log: http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/work/tasks/6116/5696116/state.log NOTE: build logs are cleaned up after 1 week For details on mass rebuild see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_20_Mass_Rebuild -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=L1iyyhdvXv&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 5

[Bug 807598] New: aqute-bnd-1.50.0 is available
by Red Hat Bugzilla 16 Jul '15

16 Jul '15

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: aqute-bnd-1.50.0 is available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=807598 Summary: aqute-bnd-1.50.0 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: Unspecified OS/Version: Unspecified Status: NEW Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Component: aqute-bnd AssignedTo: jcapik(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: java-sig-commits(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, jcapik(a)redhat.com Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Regression: --- Mount Type: --- Documentation: --- Latest upstream release: 1.50.0 Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 0.0.363 URL: http://github.com/bndtools/bnd/blob/master/biz.aQute.bnd/bnd.bnd Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 28

[Bug 1021292] New: Transaction check error when upgrading jogl2
by Red Hat Bugzilla 29 Jun '15

29 Jun '15

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021292 Bug ID: 1021292 Summary: Transaction check error when upgrading jogl2 Product: Fedora Version: 20 Component: jogl2 Assignee: c.david86(a)gmail.com Reporter: asaha(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: c.david86(a)gmail.com, java-sig-commits(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Description of problem: # rpm -q jogl2 jogl2-2.0-0.11.rc12.fc20.x86_64 # yum -y update jogl2 Loaded plugins: langpacks, refresh-packagekit Resolving Dependencies --> Running transaction check ---> Package jogl2.x86_64 0:2.0-0.11.rc12.fc20 will be updated ---> Package jogl2.x86_64 0:2.0.2-1.fc20 will be an update --> Finished Dependency Resolution Dependencies Resolved ============================================================================================================================================================================================== Package Arch Version Repository Size ============================================================================================================================================================================================== Updating: jogl2 x86_64 2.0.2-1.fc20 updates-testing 4.0 M Transaction Summary ============================================================================================================================================================================================== Upgrade 1 Package Total size: 4.0 M Downloading packages: Running transaction check Running transaction test Transaction check error: file /usr/share/doc/jogl2/bouml from install of jogl2-2.0.2-1.fc20.x86_64 conflicts with file from package jogl2-2.0-0.11.rc12.fc20.x86_64 Error Summary ------------- Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. See above 2. 3. Actual results: Expected results: Clean ugpgrade Additional info: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=YU8riko2Sl&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 2

[Bug 1008091] New: Building with tycho seems to fail on arm builders
by Red Hat Bugzilla 29 Jun '15

29 Jun '15

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1008091 Bug ID: 1008091 Summary: Building with tycho seems to fail on arm builders Product: Fedora Version: 20 Component: tycho Assignee: rgrunber(a)redhat.com Reporter: gerard(a)ryan.lt QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: java-sig-commits(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, kdaniel(a)redhat.com, mizdebsk(a)redhat.com, rgrunber(a)redhat.com Description of problem: I'm trying to build eclipse-jbosstools, but every time that an arm builder is chosen in koji, the build fails. I'm not sure exactly if the problem is with tycho, but it looks like it's tycho/maven related. How reproducible: It seems to be only on armv7hl. Also, I've only run into the problem on f20, since that's the only place I seem to have been given arm builders. Incredibly, on my 4 attempts, the two scratch builds have been done on x86, so then I go to do a real build, thinking everything is fine, and I get an arm one and it fails. Passes: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5933066 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5925100 Failures: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5925234 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5933332 Here's the build.log from one of the failures (I think those get cleared after a week or so): http://galileo.fedorapeople.org/arm-build.log Additional info: I was talking to Dennis Gilmore on #fedora-devel about this, and he mentioned that if necessary, he can provide access to arm systems to test/debug on. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=ZGobfEfjEs&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 3

[Bug 993244] New: scirenderer: FTBFS in rawhide
by Red Hat Bugzilla 29 Jun '15

29 Jun '15

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=993244 Bug ID: 993244 Summary: scirenderer: FTBFS in rawhide Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: scirenderer Assignee: c.david86(a)gmail.com Reporter: dennis(a)ausil.us QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: c.david86(a)gmail.com, java-sig-commits(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Blocks: 991858 Your package scirenderer failed to build from source in current rawhide. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5769286 For details on mass rebuild see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_20_Mass_Rebuild -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=PVBva6W1Hv&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 2

[Bug 1043158] New: zookeeper-server service silently fails while starting on FC20
by Red Hat Bugzilla 29 May '15

29 May '15

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1043158 Bug ID: 1043158 Summary: zookeeper-server service silently fails while starting on FC20 Product: Fedora Version: 20 Component: zookeeper Assignee: tstclair(a)redhat.com Reporter: rudcy(a)broadbandninja.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: java-sig-commits(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, jeff(a)ocjtech.us, skottler(a)redhat.com, tstclair(a)redhat.com Description of problem: zookeeper-server on fc20 silently fails to start after a fresh install due to unit file precondition on missing file . Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): zookeeper-server-3.4.5-12.fc20.noarch Steps to Reproduce: 1. Fresh install of fc20 2. install zookeeper-server (and zookeeper?) 3. sudo cp /etc/zoo-sample.cfg /etc/zoo.cfg 4. sudo systemctl start zookeeper 5. journalctl -f shows: ``` Dec 14 14:18:32 localhost.localdomain systemd[1]: Started Apache ZooKeeper. ``` Actual results: The service has aborted when trying to start, the errors it reported are not logged to the journal nor /var/log/zookeeper/* Expected results: the service should be running, or log an error to the journal. Additional info: ``` % cat /usr/lib/systemd/system/zookeeper.service ... ConditionPathExists=/var/lib/zookeeper/data/myid ``` Creating /var/lib/zookeeper/data/myid and chowning it over to zookeeper makes the next restart "stick" and zookeeper then logs to the journal (too verbosely, btw). I've found nothing on setting up zookeeper-server on fedora on google, but I'm new here, I may have missed it. So no docs on what is myid or what's it for, zookeeper runs fine without it if it's launched manually. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=ItjXVYdpch&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 11

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

java-sig-commits January 2014