Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=889131
Bug ID: 889131
Summary: [abrt] jpackage-utils-1.7.5-18.1.fc17:
zipfile.py:781:_RealGetContents:IOError: [Errno 22]
Invalid argument
Product: Fedora
Version: 18
Component: javapackages-tools
Severity: unspecified
Priority: unspecified
Reporter: mizdebsk(a)redhat.com
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #853759 +++
Version-Release number of selected component:
jpackage-utils-1.7.5-18.1.fc17
Additional info:
libreport version: 2.0.13
abrt_version: 2.0.12
cmdline: /usr/bin/python /usr/lib/rpm/osgi.prov
kernel: 3.5.2-3.fc17.x86_64
--- Additional comment from Ilyes Gouta on 2012-09-02 19:45:38 CEST ---
Created attachment 609141
File: backtrace
--- Additional comment from Ilyes Gouta on 2012-09-02 19:45:40 CEST ---
Created attachment 609142
File: core_backtrace
--- Additional comment from Przemek Klosowski on 2012-09-05 17:42:24 CEST ---
rebooted after update, logged into standard Gnome session, got black background
error announcement
Package: jpackage-utils-1.7.5-18.1.fc17
OS Release: Fedora release 17 (Beefy Miracle)
--- Additional comment from Mikolaj Izdebski on 2012-12-19 19:01:20 CET ---
For me this looks like a bug in python - _RealGetContents from zipfile.py is
calling seek() with invalid argument.
Reassigning to python package.
--- Additional comment from Bohuslav "Slavek" Kabrda on 2012-12-20 09:30:37 CET
---
Notes:
- Although the error is raised in _RealGetContents, the actual problem seems to
be in zipfile.is_zipfile, which wrongly returns True for /usr/bin/fastjar
(normal binary).
- Reproduce:
-- yum install libgcj, that provides /usr/bin/fastjar
-- # the following line should print False, but prints True
-- python -c "import zipfile; print zipfile.is_zipfile('/usr/bin/fastjar')"
- The core of the problem seems to be in fact, that stringEndArchive
("PK\005\006") is found in the file.
Reported upstream as http://bugs.python.org/issue16735
--- Additional comment from Stanislav Ochotnicky on 2012-12-20 09:38:41 CET ---
Part of the problem is that osgi.prov should have never been called on that
binary because it doesn't end with ".jar". Quick look doesn't tell me why it
was called because we have this in osgi.attr (rpm auto-requires/provides
generator):
%__osgi_provides %{_rpmconfigdir}/osgi.prov
#%__osgi_requires %{_rpmconfigdir}/osgi.req
%__osgi_path ^(.*\.jar|((%{_libdir}|%{_datadir}).*/MANIFEST.MF))
Note that third line has correctly escaped dot before jar
--- Additional comment from Mikolaj Izdebski on 2012-12-20 10:39:24 CET ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> Note that third line has correctly escaped dot before jar
I think there needs to be double escaping - one for rpm and one for glibc.
--- Additional comment from Mikolaj Izdebski on 2012-12-20 10:57:39 CET ---
Created attachment 666574
Reproducer
Reproduce with: rpmbuild -ba foo.spec
--- Additional comment from Mikolaj Izdebski on 2012-12-20 11:08:07 CET ---
Fixed upstream:
http://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/javapackages.git/commit/?id=5a855c8b189a46…
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=F2JO9FI4ut&a=cc_unsubscribe
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Provide OSGi metadata in junit.jar manifest file
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=784935
Summary: Provide OSGi metadata in junit.jar manifest file
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: high
Priority: high
Component: junit
AssignedTo: sochotni(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: rgrunber(a)redhat.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: sochotni(a)redhat.com,
java-sig-commits(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Classification: Fedora
Story Points: ---
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
It would be nice if the latest junit package provided OSGi metadata in the
manifest of the junit.jar . This change would allow a consumer (eclipse) to
simplify its build process which would allow a consumer of eclipse jars (tycho)
to properly process dependencies.
This change should not affect other consumers of the jar that happen to also
require certain OSGi metadata as they would already be injecting their own
attributes. (In fact it should ease their situation as well). As for consumers
of the jar who do not depend on any of the OSGi metadata, the attributes being
added would be ignored.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842346
Bug ID: 842346
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
Severity: unspecified
Version: rawhide
Priority: unspecified
CC: akurtako(a)redhat.com, ivan.afonichev(a)gmail.com,
java-sig-commits(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
kdaniel(a)redhat.com
Assignee: ivan.afonichev(a)gmail.com
Summary: Properly migrate tomcat to systemd
Regression: ---
Story Points: ---
Classification: Fedora
OS: Unspecified
Reporter: johannbg(a)gmail.com
Type: Bug
Documentation: ---
Hardware: Unspecified
Mount Type: ---
Status: NEW
Component: tomcat
Product: Fedora
Description of problem:
Let's try and properly migrate tomcat to native systemd units the
tomcat.service is just an ugly hack.
I propose that we split tomcat startup into 4 units...
1 tomcat.service
2 tomcat-security.service
3 tomcat@.service ( For multiple instances )
4.tomcat-security@.service ( For multiple instance )
Have all the required environmental parameters in one configuration file only
( /etc/tomcat/tomcat.conf )
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
How reproducible:
Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
Actual results:
Expected results:
Additional info:
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=875817
Bug ID: 875817
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
Severity: unspecified
Version: rawhide
Priority: unspecified
CC: devrim(a)gunduz.org,
java-sig-commits(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
mizdebsk(a)redhat.com, sochotni(a)redhat.com
Assignee: sochotni(a)redhat.com
Summary: Port velocity not to use werken-xpath
Regression: ---
Story Points: ---
Classification: Fedora
OS: Unspecified
Reporter: sochotni(a)redhat.com
Type: Bug
Documentation: ---
Hardware: Unspecified
Mount Type: ---
Status: NEW
Component: velocity
Product: Fedora
Description of problem:
werken is an old unmaintained library. Velocity should be ported away and just
use standard Java interfaces preferably. Needs getting in touch with upstream
of course
Slightly related bugreports upstream:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VELOCITY-757https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VELOCITY-694
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=875777
Bug ID: 875777
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
Severity: unspecified
Version: rawhide
Priority: unspecified
CC: java-sig-commits(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
jcapik(a)redhat.com, mizdebsk(a)redhat.com,
mmorsi(a)redhat.com
Assignee: jcapik(a)redhat.com
Summary: Snakeyaml bundles base64coder and part of gdata-utils
Regression: ---
Story Points: ---
Classification: Fedora
OS: Unspecified
Reporter: sochotni(a)redhat.com
Type: Bug
Documentation: ---
Hardware: Unspecified
Mount Type: ---
Status: NEW
Component: snakeyaml
Product: Fedora
Description of problem:
src/main/java/org/yaml/snakeyaml/external contains external modules that are
source-bundled within snakeyaml. Ideally they should be unbunled (they are
already packaged separately)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=880297
Bug ID: 880297
Summary: Missing license file
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7
Version: 7.0
Component: maven-plugin-exec
Severity: unspecified
Priority: unspecified
Reporter: edewata(a)redhat.com
Depends On: 880290
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #880290 +++
[2012-11-23 08:11:21] sochotni:
Upstream tarball contains LICENSE.txt which is MIT + pom.xml lists ASL 2.0 as
license and most of source files have ASL 2.0 headers.
spec file removes LICENSE.txt saying no file is actually licensed under that
license. As I understand it, files that do not have ASL 2.0 headers are MIT
actually.
Also since this is ASL 2.0 licensed package: ASL 2.0 license text has to be
included
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=880266
Bug ID: 880266
Summary: license files needed
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7
Version: 7.0
Component: maven-checkstyle-plugin
Severity: unspecified
Priority: unspecified
Reporter: alee(a)redhat.com
Depends On: 880265
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #880265 +++
Description of problem:
NOTICE file is not installed but it's required by ASL 2.0. This needs to be
fixed
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
How reproducible:
Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
Actual results:
Expected results:
Additional info:
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: ant can't find antRun
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=675949
Summary: ant can't find antRun
Product: Fedora
Version: 14
Platform: x86_64
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: unspecified
Priority: unspecified
Component: ant
AssignedTo: pcheung(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: fropeter(a)online.no
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: pcheung(a)redhat.com, akurtako(a)redhat.com,
mmatejov(a)redhat.com,
java-sig-commits(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Classification: Fedora
Description of problem:
The bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428502
is reproducible in fedora 14
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
Apache Ant version 1.7.1 compiled on April 16 2010
How reproducible:
See original bug report
Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
Actual results:
Ant fails to build, complaining about missing /usr/share/ant/bin/antRun
Expected results:
Ant finds the file and completes the build successfully
Additional info:
Fix:
# create the directory /usr/share/ant/bin
# symlink the file /usr/bin/antRun to /usr/share/ant/bin/antRun
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=865876
Bug ID: 865876
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
Severity: unspecified
Version: rawhide
Priority: unspecified
CC: java-sig-commits(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
jcapik(a)redhat.com, mizdebsk(a)redhat.com
Assignee: jcapik(a)redhat.com
Summary: jsoup-1.7.1 is available
Regression: ---
Story Points: ---
Classification: Fedora
OS: Unspecified
Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org
Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Hardware: Unspecified
Mount Type: ---
Status: NEW
Component: jsoup
Product: Fedora
Latest upstream release: 1.7.1
Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 1.6.1
URL: http://jsoup.org/download
Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy
More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.