kernel June 2011

kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org

22 participants
14 discussions

Start a nNew thread

iwlwifi: fix general 11n instability (common bug 648732)
by Stanislaw Gruszka 20 Jun '11

20 Jun '11

These patches fix fedora common bug 648732 on F-14. Patches were already posted to stable, bud did not get applied.

2 4

[PATCH] AR2413/AR5413 - Disable fast channel change by default
by Joshua C. 11 Jun '11

11 Jun '11

Can someone please apply this patch http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/mickflemm/01-fast-chan-switch… to the f15 kernel? It fixes an introduced regression with the 2.6.38 kernel https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34992 . I already filed a bug for this https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=709122 but it's not been processed yet. Thanks.

2 2

Re: [fedora-arm] adding fake-kernel to repository
by Jon Masters 08 Jun '11

08 Jun '11

On Wed, 2011-06-08 at 13:29 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: > On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 1:23 PM, Chris Tyler <chris(a)tylers.info> wrote: > > On Wed, 2011-06-08 at 09:54 +0200, Dan Horák wrote: > >> Similar package (fake-build-provides [1], [2]) is required in koji on > >> platforms where 32bit userspace lives with 64bit-only kernel (sparc and > >> s390x) so I may be worth adding such package to the collection and track > >> the changes in dist-git instead of using an ad-hocs rpms. > > > > Shouldn't fake-kernel be a subpackage of kernel? > > Certainly seems to be the obvious way to deal with it. That sounds reasonable and obvious, but I was thinking that wouldn't fly with the kernel maintainers...how about we ask them (copied). Folks: we currently don't have a kernel package in Fedora ARM. Several people are working on fixing this by working on kernel images that support various targets, and it will be excellent to get to a point where we can ask you to endorse a couple of subpackage ARM kernel variants like -omap perhaps by having a branch on the official kernel package that can carry some of the bits being worked on in a more official capacity than them living in separate packages, eventually. That will combine with support for ARM kernel unification and DeviceTree upstream so that eventually, we can do a single kernel image for most/many ARM systems (esp. v7 systems). But for some while yet, there will be some systems for which we have no useful ARM kernel package. Currently, Fedora ARM carries a special package that just provides fake deps (and we're not alone in this, other secondaries have fake deps packages for other stuff, so there is precedent for doing this). What do the kernel maintainers think about having a kernel subpackage that just provides fake deps as part of the main kernel package? Jon.

5 13

2.6.39.1
by Genes MailLists 03 Jun '11

03 Jun '11

Are there any plans to build stable 2.6.39.1 for F15 (until 3.0 is placid anyway) ? gene/

1 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

kernel June 2011