On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 01:01:54PM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
This is needed for the i686-by-default feature.
Bill
Index: kernel.spec
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/kernel/devel/kernel.spec,v retrieving revision 1.1634 diff -u -r1.1634 kernel.spec --- kernel.spec 17 Jul 2009 02:07:24 -0000 1.1634 +++ kernel.spec 17 Jul 2009 17:01:15 -0000 @@ -195,9 +195,8 @@ %endif %define debuginfodir /usr/lib/debug
-# We only build -PAE for 686 as of Fedora 11. +# We only build -PAE on 686. %ifarch i686 -%define with_up 0 %define with_pae 1 %else %define with_pae 0
The naming of 'with_up' is subtle here. With this change, we'll try building a '686' kernel as well as a '686-PAE'. (which no longer exists, in favour of using the 586 kernel)
Dave
Dave Jones (davej@redhat.com) said:
+# We only build -PAE on 686. %ifarch i686 -%define with_up 0 %define with_pae 1 %else %define with_pae 0
The naming of 'with_up' is subtle here. With this change, we'll try building a '686' kernel as well as a '686-PAE'.
That was the intent, as the i586 package would be going away.
Bill
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 10:12:06AM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Dave Jones (davej@redhat.com) said:
+# We only build -PAE on 686. %ifarch i686 -%define with_up 0 %define with_pae 1 %else %define with_pae 0
The naming of 'with_up' is subtle here. With this change, we'll try building a '686' kernel as well as a '686-PAE'.
That was the intent, as the i586 package would be going away.
Oh, I thought that proposal got shot down. We're really dropping support for all those old systems?
I'm ok with it if it's been approved, but want to be sure before I start gutting the kernel of 586isms.
Dave
kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org
-
Bill Nottingham -
Dave Jones