On Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 07:37:34AM -0500, David Woodhouse wrote:
-# CONFIG_LIBERTAS is not set
+CONFIG_LIBERTAS=m +CONFIG_LIBERTAS_USB=m +CONFIG_LIBERTAS_CS=m +CONFIG_LIBERTAS_SDIO=m +CONFIG_LIBERTAS_DEBUG=y
This is probably better placed in a per-arch override rather than building it everywhere no?
Dave
On Mon, 2007-11-26 at 12:52 -0500, Dave Jones wrote:
On Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 07:37:34AM -0500, David Woodhouse wrote:
-# CONFIG_LIBERTAS is not set
+CONFIG_LIBERTAS=m +CONFIG_LIBERTAS_USB=m +CONFIG_LIBERTAS_CS=m +CONFIG_LIBERTAS_SDIO=m +CONFIG_LIBERTAS_DEBUG=y
This is probably better placed in a per-arch override rather than building it everywhere no?
Why? What arches would you exclude it on?
(please don't use tinfoil-hat address)
On Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 12:52:43PM -0500, Dave Jones wrote:
On Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 07:37:34AM -0500, David Woodhouse wrote:
-# CONFIG_LIBERTAS is not set
+CONFIG_LIBERTAS=m +CONFIG_LIBERTAS_USB=m +CONFIG_LIBERTAS_CS=m +CONFIG_LIBERTAS_SDIO=m +CONFIG_LIBERTAS_DEBUG=y
This is probably better placed in a per-arch override rather than building it everywhere no?
That's my point, do we /want/ to build it everywhere? Is it likely to show up on ia64, sparc64, ppc64 etc etc?
Dave
kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org
-
Dave Jones -
David Woodhouse