Hey all,
I noticed that LXQt uses Openbox instead of Kwin for the
compositor/window manager. However, Openbox has been dead for almost
six years[1] and doesn't seem to have a path to Wayland. Meanwhile, it
seems Kwin works quite well with LXQt[2] and supports both X11 and
Wayland. Moreover, it's actively maintained and seems to improve the
responsiveness of the LXQt desktop.
Have you folks considered moving from Openbox to Kwin with LXQt 0.16.0
in Fedora 34?
[1]: https://github.com/danakj/openbox
[2]: https://cubiclenate.com/2019/01/27/using-kwin-on-lxqt-with-opensuse/
--
真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth!
Hello,
Do you think to integrate Trojita http://trojita.flaska.net/ in a future LXQt Spin?
Have a nice time with Fedora!
Best regards,
Patux
patux(a)fedoraproject.org
On 2/8/21 11:23 PM, Patrick Vavrina wrote:
> Hi Zamir,
>
> Thank you for your feedback and information.
>
> I would like to participe to Fedora LXQt SIG as packager but I don’t have this status yet. I need a Sponsor to obtain it. Could you please help me or recommend me a person who could become my Packager Sponsor, please?
>
Hi Patrick,
You are more than welcome to help!
Being a packager you need to get 'sponsored' by packager sponsor. It's
unfortunately that none of the LXQt maintainers are packager sponsor. So
I suggest you to follow-up the official guide[1] here. It's a bit long,
but it provides the basic information that is needed in your packaging
workflow.
OTOH, before you get sponsored into the packager group, you can still
contribute to the LXQt stuff by sending pull requests on dist git. Here
is the list of most of the LXQt packages[2]. Existing contributions via
pull requests is regarded a big plus when you are seeking for packager
sponsorship.
Feel free to reach out to the list if you have any questions.
[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers
[2] https://src.fedoraproject.org/group/lxqt-sig
> Enjoy your time!
>
> Kind regards,
> Patux
> Fedora Ambassador and FOSS Contributor
> patux(a)fedoraproject.org
> IRC: patux on Freenode
>
>
> Le 8 févr. 2021 à 15:02, Zamir SUN <zsun(a)fedoraproject.org> a écrit :
>
> Thanks for the heads-up.
>
> It's actually because LXQt recently moved their website off lxqt.org to lxqt.github.io and lxqt-project.org. I've filed a PR to get this updated.
>
> https://pagure.io/fedora-websites/pull-request/1063
>
> On 2/8/21 12:51 PM, Patrick Vavrina wrote:
>> Hello,
>> I saw a mistake in the URL of upstream LXQt Project weblink in the Documentation part :
>> https://spins.fedoraproject.org/en/lxqt/ <https://spins.fedoraproject.org/en/lxqt/>
>> The right website is https://lxqt-project.org instead of http://lxqt.org .
>> Have a nice day!
>> Best regards,
>> Patrick
>> patux(a)fedoraproject.org
>> _______________________________________________
>> LXQt mailing list -- lxqt(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>> To unsubscribe send an email to lxqt-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
>> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
>> List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/lxqt@lists.fedoraproject.org
>
--
Zamir SUN
GPG : 1D86 6D4A 49CE 4BBD 72CF FCF5 D856 6E11 F2A0 525E
Want to know more about Fedora?
Visit https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/
Ready to contribute? See https://whatcanidoforfedora.org/
想了解更多中文资讯，访问 https://zh.fedoracommunity.org/
