Kevin Kofler wrote:
Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> They're OK as long as they are development tools, and in this case
> they look like mostly development tools, so I would say this is OK.
But why would you need the EXE versions of those as opposed to the native
let see a simpler example openssl ship the openssl.exe too since many
tools used to generate/sign etc. certificate and if the result binary
which use the openssl*dll would like to the openssl.exe how can be solve
Levente "Si vis pacem para bellum!"