Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 11:57:54PM +0100, Farkas Levente wrote:
> Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 02, 2009 at 10:32:58PM +0100, Farkas Levente wrote:
>>> Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>>>> ACKed and applied to the Mercurial repository.
>>> in the meantime there is a newer native version:-(
>>> and here is the patches for this.
>> Is this patch still waiting for attention?
> yes imho should have to apply to the hg (at least this still diff from
> the hg repo). anyway why is there the hg repo when openssl is in fedora cvs?
I should have removed it from the hg repository, and if I didn't then
that's a mistake. As is the case here, so I'll remove it shortly.
Can you repost the latest version of your patch against the Fedora
CVS, and I'll try to take a look at it on Monday.
sorry, fedora cvs already contains the latest version i just check
against the hg wrongly:-(
Levente "Si vis pacem para bellum!"