Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
--- Comment #4 from Thomas Sailer <t.sailer(a)alumni.ethz.ch> 2009-04-28 14:53:30 EDT
(In reply to comment #3)
! How was it determined that the native's package license should
Good you noticed that. It isn't MIT, it is under zlib. There are a few
copyright notices as comments in source files, eg. sqlite3x.hpp.
I changed the license tag in the above spec file, and I will also change the
native package. David Woodhouse (the reviewer of the native package), has also
been notified, he is ok with the change.
! The package contains documentation already present in the native
! But is there a reason for having the "BuildArch: noarch"
the middle of the list of Thr BuildRequies?
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.