Hi everyone!
I, and you probably as well, noticed, that a lot of packages use tap module for testing. The version packaged in fedora is quite outdated and obviously needs an update. My question is, is it a good idea to multiversion this package or should we just update to latest version? I can see developers use 2.x and 1.x version, sometimes even 0.x, 1.x and 2.x dependencies are mostly the same packages in the same versions.
Thanks
Zuzka
On 21/12/15 16:05, Zuzana Svetlikova wrote:
I, and you probably as well, noticed, that a lot of packages use tap module for testing. The version packaged in fedora is quite outdated and obviously needs an update. My question is, is it a good idea to multiversion this package or should we just update to latest version? I can see developers use 2.x and 1.x version, sometimes even 0.x, 1.x and 2.x dependencies are mostly the same packages in the same versions.
Our general policy has been that we only multiversion if we really have to so if packages using older versions can relatively easily be patched to use a newer one then we usually wouldn't bother.
How big are the differences? Is it common to need to patch things, and it so how hard is it?
Tom
On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 11:15 AM, Tom Hughes tom@compton.nu wrote:
How big are the differences? Is it common to need to patch things, and it so how hard is it?
I've had two recent packages that needed to be patched for the old version of tap, and it wasn't that hard to patch. I'm assuming it would be even easier to patch going from an older version to a newer version.
-- Jared Smith
nodejs@lists.fedoraproject.org