Kamil Dudka wrote:
On Thursday, July 24, 2014 08:39:01 Elio Maldonado wrote:
> On 04/02/2012 10:42 AM, Kamil Dudka wrote:
>> On Monday 02 April 2012 18:50:24 Elio Maldonado Batiz wrote:
>>> Keeping Rob's naming convention of nss-pem-yyyymmdd.tar.bz2 via 'tar
>>> cvjf nss-pem-$(date +%Y%m%d).tar.bz2 mozilla' unless someone suggests
>> I would suggest to use git-archive instead:
>> $ git archive --format=tar HEAD | bzip2 -c > nss-pem-$(date
>> The advantage is that only files tracked by git will appear in the
>> resulting archive (stray files in the working directory are simply
> Resurrecting this old email thread. I am not happy keeping doing this.
> Time-stamping the name was okay in the early stages but not now. It can
> lead to errors which are hard to track. I want to get out of the
> business of making pseudo release tar balls balls in fedora. Now we have
> an interim upstream repo for the pem work and Kai is making steady
> progress in cleaning up the code for the submission upstream as part of
> Would it be a good idea to make and post release tar balls as Kai
> reaches certain milestones?
Sounds like a good idea. Would it be possible to create a lightweight git tag
per release so that we can keep track of changes between releases?