openlmi-devel July 2014

openlmi-devel@lists.stg.fedorahosted.org

16 participants
37 discussions

Start a nNew thread

openlmi-reviews Digest, Vol 15, Issue 23
by openlmi-reviews-request＠lists.fedorahosted.org 21 Jul '14

21 Jul '14

1 0

openlmi-reviews Digest, Vol 15, Issue 22
by openlmi-reviews-request＠lists.fedorahosted.org 20 Jul '14

20 Jul '14

1 0

openlmi-reviews Digest, Vol 15, Issue 21
by openlmi-reviews-request＠lists.fedorahosted.org 19 Jul '14

19 Jul '14

1 0

openlmi-reviews Digest, Vol 15, Issue 20
by openlmi-reviews-request＠lists.fedorahosted.org 18 Jul '14

18 Jul '14

1 0

openlmi-reviews Digest, Vol 15, Issue 19
by openlmi-reviews-request＠lists.fedorahosted.org 17 Jul '14

17 Jul '14

1 0

RE: A provider for publishing Management Controller (Service Processor) information
by Praveen_Paladugu＠Dell.com 16 Jul '14

16 Jul '14

Firstly, Sorry about the long long delay with the response. Because of a few personal and work items, had to push this to the back burner. Have a few cycles to work on this and would like to get this going again. Based on the comments from the past threads, updated the MOF as follows and added some of my comments below, please take a look. [Description("Model an Out of Band Management Controller and capture its features and capabilities")] class LMI_BMC : CIM_ManagementController { [Description("This variable, should always capture the latest ipv4 IP/s addresses of BMC.")] string IP4Addresses[]; [Description("This variable, should always capture the latest ipv6 IP/s addresses of BMC.")] string IP6Addresses[]; [Description("The VLAN setting on the BMC NIC port.")] string VLAN; [Description("This variable will capture MAC address of the BMC.")] string PermanentMACAddresses; [Description("If BMC provides any user friendly interfaces like http, ftp etc, this variable will capture the related URL/s to interact with BMC.")] string BMC_URL[]; /* COMMENT: If the following properties are rolledup into CIM_LogicalDevice, would a user enumerating LMI_BMC not be able to see these properties? Or is it just a matter of how the Enumeration function is defined for this class? */ /* #Capture this information in IdentifyingDescriptions inherited from CIM_LogicalDevice #string Manufacturer_ID; #string Manufacturer; #string Model; */ [Description("This variable will capture the version of the firmware installed on the BMC")] string FirmwareVersion; [Description("This Array will capture the list of protocols supported by the BMC")] string SupportedProtos[]; [Description("This Array will capture the version of the supported protocol listed in the corresponding index of SupportedProtos ")] string SupportedProtoVersion[]; /*COMMENT: Should the below function assign a new virtual ip address to those already on the BMC? Or should the user be able to pass a list of IP addresses to overwrite the existing ones? Am leaning towards the latter option*/ [Description("Function to add a new IPv4 address to BMC." "If the operation of setting the IP Address succeeds, return 0" "If command fails, return 1" "If the provided input is not a valid IP address, return 2" )] uint32 set_IP4Address( [IN, Description ("Set the IP address of the BMC, to the input value")] string Input_IP, [IN, Description ("Set the netmask to this input value")] string Input_Netmask, [IN, Description ("Set the gateway this input value")] string Input_Gateway); [Description("Function to assign a new IPv6 address to BMC." "If the operation of setting the IP Address succeeds, return 0" "If IPMI command fails, return 1" "If the provided input is not a valid IP address, return 2" )] uint32 set_IP6Address( [IN, Description ("Set the IP address of the BMC, to the input value")] string Input_IP6Address, [IN, Description ("Set the netmask to this input value")] string Input_Netmask, [IN, Description ("Set the gateway on BMC to this input value")] string Input_Gateway); [Description("Function to assign a VLAN ID to BMC." "If the operation of setting the VLAN ID succeeds, return 0" "If command fails, return 1" "If the provided input is not a valid VLAN ID, return 2" )] uint32 set_VLAN( [IN, Description("Set the VLAN ID of BMC NIC to this input value")] string Input_Vlan ); [Description("Some servers have dedicated NIC attached to BMC, some share a LOM used for host n/w communications. This function will let the user determine which the case is." "dedicated: will let the user know that BMC is using a dedicated NIC" "A response like LOM1 will let the user know that BMC is sharing LOM1 of the server with the OS." )] string get_active_nic(); }; Thank you Praveen K Paladugu Dell Linux Engineering

3 7

openlmi-reviews Digest, Vol 15, Issue 18
by openlmi-reviews-request＠lists.fedorahosted.org 16 Jul '14

16 Jul '14

1 0

OpenLMI tracing facility
by Jan Synacek 15 Jul '14

15 Jul '14

I've been trying trying to implement the SELinux provider for a while now. It is written in C and it uses the new job manager. So far, I've only had to implement jobs in storage, which is python, and that was relatively easy compared to all the detail that has to be taken care of in C. This complexity, and the fact that debugging it is pretty hard, led me to an idea... I suggest that all the providers (I'm now mainly concerned about openlmi-providers) have a common, unified tracing facility. We should be able to turn it on as the lowest logging level and it should trace entrance/exit of all functions. This would make debugging and pinpointing failures much easier. #define lmi_trace_in lmi_debug("==> %s", __PRETTY_FUNCTION__); #define lmi_trace_out lmi_debug("<== %s", __PRETTY_FUNCTION__); #define lmi_trace_out_rc(rc) lmi_debug("<== %s (rc=%d)", __PRETTY_FUNCTION__, rc); Every function would look like: void function() { lmi_trace_in stuff(); lmi_trace_out /* or lmi_trace_out_rc(rc) where relevant */ } Note that "lmi_debug" could be replaced with something like "lmi_trace", which would be defined via CMPI bindings to be even lower level than "lmi_debug". Suggestions and constructive criticism welcome. -- Jan Synacek Software Engineer, Red Hat

4 5

openlmi-reviews Digest, Vol 15, Issue 17
by openlmi-reviews-request＠lists.fedorahosted.org 15 Jul '14

15 Jul '14

1 0

openlmi-reviews Digest, Vol 15, Issue 16
by openlmi-reviews-request＠lists.fedorahosted.org 15 Jul '14

15 Jul '14

Send openlmi-reviews mailing list submissions to openlmi-reviews(a)lists.fedorahosted.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/openlmi-reviews or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to openlmi-reviews-request(a)lists.fedorahosted.org You can reach the person managing the list at openlmi-reviews-owner(a)lists.fedorahosted.org When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of openlmi-reviews digest..." Today's Topics: 1. Re: Review Request 1893: openlmi-providers: polkit v2 [1/3] Add documentation of polkit usage. (Jan Safranek) 2. Re: Review Request 1699: OpenLMI SSSD provider (Jan Safranek) 3. Re: Review Request 1699: OpenLMI SSSD provider (=?utf-8?b?UGF2ZWwgQsOF4oSiZXppbmE=?=) 4. buildbot failure in OpenLMI on providers-rhel7 (openlmiproject(a)gmail.com) 5. buildbot failure in OpenLMI on providers-rhel6 (openlmiproject(a)gmail.com) 6. Re: Review Request 1897: fix tests for openlmi-providers (Peter Hatina) 7. Re: Review Request 1870: jobmanager: added README (Michal Minar) 8. Review Request 1899: jobmanager: set ReturnValue property on CIM_InstMethodCall (Michal Minar) 9. Review Request 1900: sw(fix&enhance) [1/5] software: fix description in mof file (Michal Minar) 10. Review Request 1901: sw(fix&enhance) [2/5] software-dbus: instrument SoftwareInstDeletion class (Michal Minar) 11. Review Request 1902: sw(fix&enhance) [3/5] software-dbus: implemented FindIdentity() method (Michal Minar) 12. Review Request 1903: sw(fix&enhance) [4/5] software-dbus: fix input parameter creation (Michal Minar) 13. Review Request 1904: sw(fix&enhance) [5/5] software-dbus: correctly deal with reinstallation and updates (Michal Minar) 14. Re: Review Request 1899: jobmanager: set ReturnValue property on CIM_InstMethodCall (scanbot) 15. Re: Review Request 1900: sw(fix&enhance) [1/5] software: fix description in mof file (scanbot) 16. Re: Review Request 1901: sw(fix&enhance) [2/5] software-dbus: instrument SoftwareInstDeletion class (scanbot) 17. Re: Review Request 1902: sw(fix&enhance) [3/5] software-dbus: implemented FindIdentity() method (scanbot) 18. Re: Review Request 1904: sw(fix&enhance) [5/5] software-dbus: correctly deal with reinstallation and updates (scanbot) 19. Review Request 1898: spec: ship README for jobmanager (Michal Minar) 20. Re: Review Request 1899: jobmanager: set ReturnValue property on CIM_InstMethodCall (scanbot) 21. Re: Review Request 1900: sw(fix&enhance) [1/5] software: fix description in mof file (scanbot) 22. Re: Review Request 1901: sw(fix&enhance) [2/5] software-dbus: instrument SoftwareInstDeletion class (scanbot) 23. Re: Review Request 1902: sw(fix&enhance) [3/5] software-dbus: implemented FindIdentity() method (scanbot) 24. Re: Review Request 1903: sw(fix&enhance) [4/5] software-dbus: fix input parameter creation (scanbot) 25. Re: Review Request 1904: sw(fix&enhance) [5/5] software-dbus: correctly deal with reinstallation and updates (scanbot) 26. buildbot failure in OpenLMI on providers-rawhide (openlmiproject(a)gmail.com) 27. buildbot failure in OpenLMI on providers-rawhide (openlmiproject(a)gmail.com) 28. buildbot failure in OpenLMI on storage-rawhide (openlmiproject(a)gmail.com) 29. buildbot failure in OpenLMI on networking-rawhide (openlmiproject(a)gmail.com) 30. buildbot failure in OpenLMI on providers-rawhide (openlmiproject(a)gmail.com) 31. buildbot failure in OpenLMI on storage-rawhide (openlmiproject(a)gmail.com) 32. buildbot failure in OpenLMI on networking-rawhide (openlmiproject(a)gmail.com) 33. buildbot failure in OpenLMI on storage-rawhide (openlmiproject(a)gmail.com) 34. buildbot failure in OpenLMI on networking-rawhide (openlmiproject(a)gmail.com) 35. buildbot failure in OpenLMI on providers-rawhide (openlmiproject(a)gmail.com) 36. buildbot failure in OpenLMI on providers-rawhide (openlmiproject(a)gmail.com) 37. buildbot failure in OpenLMI on providers-rawhide (openlmiproject(a)gmail.com) 38. buildbot failure in OpenLMI on networking-rawhide (openlmiproject(a)gmail.com) 39. buildbot failure in OpenLMI on storage-rawhide (openlmiproject(a)gmail.com) 40. buildbot failure in OpenLMI on providers-rawhide (openlmiproject(a)gmail.com) 41. buildbot failure in OpenLMI on providers-rawhide (openlmiproject(a)gmail.com) 42. buildbot failure in OpenLMI on storage-rawhide (openlmiproject(a)gmail.com) 43. buildbot failure in OpenLMI on networking-rawhide (openlmiproject(a)gmail.com) 44. buildbot failure in OpenLMI on networking-rawhide (openlmiproject(a)gmail.com) 45. buildbot failure in OpenLMI on storage-rhel6 (openlmiproject(a)gmail.com) 46. buildbot failure in OpenLMI on providers-rhel6 (openlmiproject(a)gmail.com) 47. buildbot failure in OpenLMI on networking-rhel6 (openlmiproject(a)gmail.com) 48. buildbot failure in OpenLMI on storage-rawhide (openlmiproject(a)gmail.com) 49. buildbot failure in OpenLMI on storage-rhel7stable (openlmiproject(a)gmail.com) 50. buildbot failure in OpenLMI on storage-rhel7 (openlmiproject(a)gmail.com) 51. buildbot failure in OpenLMI on providers-rhel7 (openlmiproject(a)gmail.com) 52. buildbot success in OpenLMI on networking-rhel7 (openlmiproject(a)gmail.com) 53. buildbot failure in OpenLMI on providers-rawhide (openlmiproject(a)gmail.com) 54. buildbot failure in OpenLMI on providers-rawhide (openlmiproject(a)gmail.com) 55. Re: Review Request 1891: openlmi-providers: polkit v2 [2/3] Add lmipolkitagent (Jan Synacek) 56. buildbot failure in OpenLMI on providers-rawhide (openlmiproject(a)gmail.com) 57. Re: Review Request 1897: fix tests for openlmi-providers (Michal Minar) 58. Re: Review Request 1886: [1/2] jobmanager: improve lmi_job_set_state and lmi_job_finish_exception (Jan Synacek) 59. buildbot failure in OpenLMI on providers-rhel7 (openlmiproject(a)gmail.com) 60. buildbot failure in OpenLMI on providers-rhel6 (openlmiproject(a)gmail.com) 61. Re: Review Request 1900: sw(fix&enhance) [1/5] software: fix description in mof file (Jan Synacek) 62. Re: Review Request 1901: sw(fix&enhance) [2/5] software-dbus: instrument SoftwareInstDeletion class (Jan Synacek) 63. Re: Review Request 1901: sw(fix&enhance) [2/5] software-dbus: instrument SoftwareInstDeletion class (Jan Synacek) 64. Re: Review Request 1902: sw(fix&enhance) [3/5] software-dbus: implemented FindIdentity() method (Jan Synacek) 65. Re: Review Request 1903: sw(fix&enhance) [4/5] software-dbus: fix input parameter creation (Jan Synacek) 66. Re: Review Request 1904: sw(fix&enhance) [5/5] software-dbus: correctly deal with reinstallation and updates (Jan Synacek) 67. buildbot failure in OpenLMI on providers-rawhide (openlmiproject(a)gmail.com) 68. Re: Review Request 1893: openlmi-providers: polkit v2 [1/3] Add documentation of polkit usage. (Jan Synacek) 69. buildbot failure in OpenLMI on networking-rawhide (openlmiproject(a)gmail.com) 70. Re: Review Request 1897: fix tests for openlmi-providers (Peter Hatina) 71. buildbot failure in OpenLMI on providers-rhel7stable (openlmiproject(a)gmail.com) 72. buildbot failure in OpenLMI on storage-rawhide (openlmiproject(a)gmail.com) 73. Re: Review Request 1897: fix tests for openlmi-providers (Michal Minar) 74. Re: Review Request 1897: fix tests for openlmi-providers (Peter Hatina) 75. buildbot failure in OpenLMI on providers-rhel7 (openlmiproject(a)gmail.com) 76. buildbot failure in OpenLMI on providers-rhel6 (openlmiproject(a)gmail.com) 77. Re: Review Request 1887: [2/2] jobmanager: add tracing facility (Jan Synacek) 78. Re: Review Request 1893: openlmi-providers: polkit v2 [1/3] Add documentation of polkit usage. (Jan Safranek) 79. buildbot failure in OpenLMI on storage-rawhide (openlmiproject(a)gmail.com) 80. buildbot failure in OpenLMI on networking-rawhide (openlmiproject(a)gmail.com) 81. Review Request 1905: [1/2] jobmanager: display job error in debug log (Jan Synacek) 82. Review Request 1906: [2/2] jobmanager: fix spelling (Jan Synacek) 83. Re: Review Request 1905: [1/2] jobmanager: display job error in debug log (scanbot) 84. Re: Review Request 1906: [2/2] jobmanager: fix spelling (scanbot) 85. Re: Review Request 1905: [1/2] jobmanager: display job error in debug log (scanbot) 86. Re: Review Request 1906: [2/2] jobmanager: fix spelling (scanbot) 87. buildbot failure in OpenLMI on providers-rawhide (openlmiproject(a)gmail.com) _______________________________________________ openlmi-reviews mailing list openlmi-reviews(a)lists.fedorahosted.org https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/openlmi-reviews

1 0

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

openlmi-devel July 2014