---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: "George varghese" georgooty@gmail.com Date: Apr 27, 2013 12:31 PM Subject: Re: software update profile support To: miminar@redhat.com
Hi,
I have installed openlmi-provider into my system. After the installation openlmi-privider folder contains some mof and reg files. But missing software reg file . So I don't able to openlmi-mof register this file . my requirement is I want to check software update profile.
Pleas help me, for the initial set up, hoe to do this, I have used CIMOM is sfcb.
Regards, George
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 4:27 PM, George varghese georgooty@gmail.comwrote:
Thank you so much. I have done as per u said. Renamed LMI_Qualifiers.mof to 00_LMI_Qualifiers.mof file which installed openlmi-providers.
Error still remains.
One question LMI_Software reg file missing after the installation of the openlmi-provider-0.0.20.
Please suggest me, anything I missed here also please share to me soap xml document for testing it via http request.
Regards, George
Regards, George
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 11:14 AM, Michal Minář miminar@redhat.com wrote:
Hi George,
I presume you are trying openlmi-providers-0.0.20. We already know about a problem with sbcb. It failes in compiling mof files with dependencies among them in arbitrary order. So in order for LMI_Software.mof to compile, it must be parsed after LMI_Qualifiers.mof.
Solution: Rename LMI_Qualifiers.mof to 00_LMI_Qualifiers.mof or checkout current master branch from our repository.
Unfortunately this is not the only problem you will face when dealing with sfcb. The others are crashing interop provider and not working indications. We are working on them. Jan Šafránek have already solved most of issues [1].
Updated package will be released soon. So for the time being you may try to apply patches from sourceforge ticket [1] or test with tog-pegasus.
If you bump into any problem with our providers next time, feel free to file a bug against them in our bugzilla [2].
[1] http://sourceforge.net/p/sblim/sfcb-tix/37/ [2] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=openlmi-providers&li...
Best regards, Michal
On 24.4.2013 11:34, George varghese wrote:
Hi,
I have installed openlmi-provider into my system.
How to test software update via sfcb.
LMI_Software.mof
$ sfcbrepos -f
got following errors.
*/usr/local/var/lib/sfcb/stage/**mofs/root/cimv2/LMI_Software.**mof line 556 near true: Implemented is not a known qualifier*
*How to resolve this error?*
Regards,
George
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 8:58 PM, George varghese georgooty@gmail.comwrote:
Thank you so much for your advice. In my previous mail, there are some unanswered questions.. Can you please explain on that too. Regards, George On Apr 23, 2013 6:35 PM, "Michal Minář" miminar@redhat.com wrote:
It depends on how much do you want to be profile compliant. All SMASH profiles are well described in specific documents [1]. There you can find all requirements for your providers. If you don't aim for profile-feature complete implementation, you may save yourself a lot of time. But users of your API then won't know what to expect and how to call your providers.
For start, you may check out the code of software provider [2], which conforms to software inventory [3] and software update [4] profiles. See the methods implemented there and try to do it in your own way. Please, if you find some inconsistency between profiles and OpenLMI implementation, let us know by opening a ticket at our track.
Good luck, Michal
[1] http://www.dmtf.org/standards/profiles [2] https://fedorahosted.org/openlmi/browser/openlmi-providers/src/software/ [3] http://www.dmtf.org/sites/default/files/standards/documents/DSP1023_1.0.1.pd... [4] http://www.dmtf.org/sites/default/files/standards/documents/DSP1025_1.0.0.pd...
On 23.4.2013 14:08, George varghese wrote:
Hi,
I want to implement Software Update Profile in to my board.
I have installed openwsman, CIMOM as SFCB , OpenLMI-Provider, CMPI-base providers,konkretCMPI.
I read CIM provider document of OpenLMI. Its good document.
for software update, Have these kind of classes are defined( https://fedorahosted.org/openlmi/wiki/software ).
if we implement a new CIM provider for software update, shall I derive existing CIM_ classes to my new classes?
if so, I shall creating a .c and .h file using konkretcmpi tool. In these classes have some methods.. which method is need implementation? is enumclass method?
I have used mod_wsman apache plugin for openwsman. if have, sample wsman soap request for software update, please..
please advise me for implement this.
Regards, George
openlmi-devel mailing listopenlmi-devel@lists.fedorahosted.orghttps://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/openlmi-devel
openlmi-devel mailing list openlmi-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/openlmi-devel
openlmi-devel mailing listopenlmi-devel@lists.fedorahosted.orghttps://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/openlmi-devel
openlmi-devel mailing list openlmi-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/openlmi-devel
On 04/29/2013 08:13 AM, George varghese wrote:
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: "George varghese" georgooty@gmail.com Date: Apr 27, 2013 12:31 PM Subject: Re: software update profile support To: miminar@redhat.com
Hi,
I have installed openlmi-provider into my system. After the installation openlmi-privider folder contains some mof and reg files. But missing software reg file . So I don't able to openlmi-mof register this file . my requirement is I want to check software update profile.
So you have only openlmi-providers package installed? For software provider you have to install openlmi-software package also.
Pleas help me, for the initial set up, hoe to do this, I have used CIMOM is sfcb.
Quick how to on our wiki can help you: https://fedorahosted.org/openlmi/wiki/Howto We are developing and testing on Fedora distribution. For other distributions some parts of set up can be different.
Feel free to join us on IRC: #openlmi @ freenode.
RR
Regards, George
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 4:27 PM, George varghese georgooty@gmail.comwrote:
Thank you so much. I have done as per u said. Renamed LMI_Qualifiers.mof to 00_LMI_Qualifiers.mof file which installed openlmi-providers.
Error still remains.
One question LMI_Software reg file missing after the installation of the openlmi-provider-0.0.20.
Please suggest me, anything I missed here also please share to me soap xml document for testing it via http request.
Regards, George
Regards, George
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 11:14 AM, Michal Minář miminar@redhat.com wrote:
Hi George,
I presume you are trying openlmi-providers-0.0.20. We already know about a problem with sbcb. It failes in compiling mof files with dependencies among them in arbitrary order. So in order for LMI_Software.mof to compile, it must be parsed after LMI_Qualifiers.mof.
Solution: Rename LMI_Qualifiers.mof to 00_LMI_Qualifiers.mof or checkout current master branch from our repository.
Unfortunately this is not the only problem you will face when dealing with sfcb. The others are crashing interop provider and not working indications. We are working on them. Jan Šafránek have already solved most of issues [1].
Updated package will be released soon. So for the time being you may try to apply patches from sourceforge ticket [1] or test with tog-pegasus.
If you bump into any problem with our providers next time, feel free to file a bug against them in our bugzilla [2].
[1] http://sourceforge.net/p/sblim/sfcb-tix/37/ [2] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=openlmi-providers&li...
Best regards, Michal
On 24.4.2013 11:34, George varghese wrote:
Hi,
I have installed openlmi-provider into my system.
How to test software update via sfcb.
LMI_Software.mof
$ sfcbrepos -f
got following errors.
*/usr/local/var/lib/sfcb/stage/**mofs/root/cimv2/LMI_Software.**mof line 556 near true: Implemented is not a known qualifier*
*How to resolve this error?*
Regards,
George
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 8:58 PM, George varghese georgooty@gmail.comwrote:
Thank you so much for your advice. In my previous mail, there are some unanswered questions.. Can you please explain on that too. Regards, George On Apr 23, 2013 6:35 PM, "Michal Minář" miminar@redhat.com wrote:
It depends on how much do you want to be profile compliant. All SMASH profiles are well described in specific documents [1]. There you can find all requirements for your providers. If you don't aim for profile-feature complete implementation, you may save yourself a lot of time. But users of your API then won't know what to expect and how to call your providers.
For start, you may check out the code of software provider [2], which conforms to software inventory [3] and software update [4] profiles. See the methods implemented there and try to do it in your own way. Please, if you find some inconsistency between profiles and OpenLMI implementation, let us know by opening a ticket at our track.
Good luck, Michal
[1] http://www.dmtf.org/standards/profiles [2] https://fedorahosted.org/openlmi/browser/openlmi-providers/src/software/ [3] http://www.dmtf.org/sites/default/files/standards/documents/DSP1023_1.0.1.pd... [4] http://www.dmtf.org/sites/default/files/standards/documents/DSP1025_1.0.0.pd...
On 23.4.2013 14:08, George varghese wrote:
Hi,
I want to implement Software Update Profile in to my board.
I have installed openwsman, CIMOM as SFCB , OpenLMI-Provider, CMPI-base providers,konkretCMPI.
I read CIM provider document of OpenLMI. Its good document.
for software update, Have these kind of classes are defined( https://fedorahosted.org/openlmi/wiki/software ).
if we implement a new CIM provider for software update, shall I derive existing CIM_ classes to my new classes?
if so, I shall creating a .c and .h file using konkretcmpi tool. In these classes have some methods.. which method is need implementation? is enumclass method?
I have used mod_wsman apache plugin for openwsman. if have, sample wsman soap request for software update, please..
please advise me for implement this.
Regards, George
openlmi-devel mailing listopenlmi-devel@lists.fedorahosted.orghttps://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/openlmi-devel
openlmi-devel mailing list openlmi-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/openlmi-devel
openlmi-devel mailing listopenlmi-devel@lists.fedorahosted.orghttps://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/openlmi-devel
openlmi-devel mailing list openlmi-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/openlmi-devel
openlmi-devel mailing list openlmi-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/openlmi-devel
Thank you. For installing software package, I try , python setup.py install in /software folder. But where its lib was copying .. On Apr 29, 2013 5:36 PM, "Roman Rakus" rrakus@redhat.com wrote:
On 04/29/2013 08:13 AM, George varghese wrote:
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: "George varghese" georgooty@gmail.com Date: Apr 27, 2013 12:31 PM Subject: Re: software update profile support To: miminar@redhat.com
Hi,
I have installed openlmi-provider into my system. After the installation openlmi-privider folder contains some mof and reg files. But missing software reg file . So I don't able to openlmi-mof register this file . my requirement is I want to check software update profile.
So you have only openlmi-providers package installed? For software provider you have to install openlmi-software package also.
Pleas help me, for the initial set up, hoe to do this, I have used CIMOM is sfcb.
Quick how to on our wiki can help you: https://fedorahosted.org/** openlmi/wiki/Howto https://fedorahosted.org/openlmi/wiki/Howto We are developing and testing on Fedora distribution. For other distributions some parts of set up can be different.
Feel free to join us on IRC: #openlmi @ freenode.
RR
Regards, George
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 4:27 PM, George varghese <georgooty@gmail.com
wrote:
Thank you so much.
I have done as per u said. Renamed LMI_Qualifiers.mof to 00_LMI_Qualifiers.mof file which installed openlmi-providers.
Error still remains.
One question LMI_Software reg file missing after the installation of the openlmi-provider-0.0.20.
Please suggest me, anything I missed here also please share to me soap xml document for testing it via http request.
Regards, George
Regards, George
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 11:14 AM, Michal Minář miminar@redhat.com wrote:
Hi George,
I presume you are trying openlmi-providers-0.0.20. We already know about a problem with sbcb. It failes in compiling mof files with dependencies among them in arbitrary order. So in order for LMI_Software.mof to compile, it must be parsed after LMI_Qualifiers.mof.
Solution: Rename LMI_Qualifiers.mof to 00_LMI_Qualifiers.mof or checkout current master branch from our repository.
Unfortunately this is not the only problem you will face when dealing with sfcb. The others are crashing interop provider and not working indications. We are working on them. Jan Šafránek have already solved most of issues [1].
Updated package will be released soon. So for the time being you may try to apply patches from sourceforge ticket [1] or test with tog-pegasus.
If you bump into any problem with our providers next time, feel free to file a bug against them in our bugzilla [2].
[1] http://sourceforge.net/p/**sblim/sfcb-tix/37/http://sourceforge.net/p/sblim/sfcb-tix/37/ [2] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/**buglist.cgi?quicksearch=** openlmi-providers&list_id=**1308951https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=openlmi-providers&list_id=1308951
Best regards, Michal
On 24.4.2013 11:34, George varghese wrote:
Hi,
I have installed openlmi-provider into my system.
How to test software update via sfcb.
LMI_Software.mof
$ sfcbrepos -f
got following errors.
*/usr/local/var/lib/sfcb/**stage/**mofs/root/cimv2/LMI_**Software.**mof line 556 near true: Implemented is not a known qualifier*
*How to resolve this error?*
Regards,
George
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 8:58 PM, George varghese <georgooty@gmail.com
wrote:
Thank you so much for your advice.
In my previous mail, there are some unanswered questions.. Can you please explain on that too. Regards, George On Apr 23, 2013 6:35 PM, "Michal Minář" miminar@redhat.com wrote:
It depends on how much do you want to be profile compliant.
All SMASH profiles are well described in specific documents [1]. There you can find all requirements for your providers. If you don't aim for profile-feature complete implementation, you may save yourself a lot of time. But users of your API then won't know what to expect and how to call your providers.
For start, you may check out the code of software provider [2], which conforms to software inventory [3] and software update [4] profiles. See the methods implemented there and try to do it in your own way. Please, if you find some inconsistency between profiles and OpenLMI implementation, let us know by opening a ticket at our track.
Good luck, Michal
[1] http://www.dmtf.org/standards/**profileshttp://www.dmtf.org/standards/profiles [2] https://fedorahosted.org/**openlmi/browser/openlmi-** providers/src/software/https://fedorahosted.org/openlmi/browser/openlmi-providers/src/software/ [3] http://www.dmtf.org/sites/**default/files/standards/** documents/DSP1023_1.0.1.pdfhttp://www.dmtf.org/sites/default/files/standards/documents/DSP1023_1.0.1.pdf [4] http://www.dmtf.org/sites/**default/files/standards/** documents/DSP1025_1.0.0.pdfhttp://www.dmtf.org/sites/default/files/standards/documents/DSP1025_1.0.0.pdf
On 23.4.2013 14:08, George varghese wrote:
Hi,
I want to implement Software Update Profile in to my board.
I have installed openwsman, CIMOM as SFCB , OpenLMI-Provider, CMPI-base providers,konkretCMPI.
I read CIM provider document of OpenLMI. Its good document.
for software update, Have these kind of classes are defined( https://fedorahosted.org/**openlmi/wiki/softwarehttps://fedorahosted.org/openlmi/wiki/software).
if we implement a new CIM provider for software update, shall I derive existing CIM_ classes to my new classes?
if so, I shall creating a .c and .h file using konkretcmpi tool. In these classes have some methods.. which method is need implementation? is enumclass method?
I have used mod_wsman apache plugin for openwsman. if have, sample wsman soap request for software update, please..
please advise me for implement this.
Regards, George
______________________________**_________________ openlmi-devel mailing listopenlmi-devel@lists.** fedorahosted.orghttps://lists.**fedorahosted.org/mailman/** listinfo/openlmi-develhttp://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/openlmi-devel
______________________________**_________________ openlmi-devel mailing list openlmi-devel@lists.**fedorahosted.orgopenlmi-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org https://lists.fedorahosted.**org/mailman/listinfo/openlmi-**develhttps://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/openlmi-devel
______________________________**_________________ openlmi-devel mailing listopenlmi-devel@lists.** fedorahosted.orghttps://lists.**fedorahosted.org/mailman/** listinfo/openlmi-develhttp://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/openlmi-devel
______________________________**_________________ openlmi-devel mailing list openlmi-devel@lists.**fedorahosted.orgopenlmi-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org https://lists.fedorahosted.**org/mailman/listinfo/openlmi-**develhttps://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/openlmi-devel
______________________________**_________________ openlmi-devel mailing list openlmi-devel@lists.**fedorahosted.orgopenlmi-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org https://lists.fedorahosted.**org/mailman/listinfo/openlmi-**develhttps://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/openlmi-devel
openlmi-devel@lists.stg.fedorahosted.org