packaging July 2007

packaging@lists.fedoraproject.org

31 participants
24 discussions

Tcl packaging guidelines proposal
by Michael Thomas 02 Jan '08

02 Jan '08

I sent this proposal to f-m-l about a week ago to gather comments, and there were no serious disagreements with the proposal which have not yet been addressed (thanks to Tibbs and Toshio for their feedback). Basically, I want to establish a set of guidelines for packaging Tcl extensions, as we already have guidelines for other popular scripting languages. In addition to making Tcl packages more consistent with each other, it will also help work toward fixing my pet-peeve bug (bz #226893) http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Tcl Please let me know if I need to do anything to help get these draft guidelines adopted. Thanks, --Wart

4 10

font package naming
by Jens-Ulrik Petersen 21 Sep '07

21 Sep '07

Hi, I would like to propose adding the following text to our "Package Naming Guidelines". http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines ''' == Fonts Packages == Font packages should be named with the upstream name appended with `-fonts`. Examples: {{{ bitmap-fonts dejavu-lgc-fonts ghostscript-fonts urw-fonts xorg-x11-fonts }}} ''' Should the text discuss what to do when the upstream name contains the word "font" already? See https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-maintainers/2007-February/msg00794.h… and https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-maintainers/2007-March/msg00262.html for some recent discussion of <upstreamname>-fonts vs fonts-<language> and "-fonts" vs "-font" for singlet font packages. Comments or objections? Jens ps We might even consider renaming some of our "fonts-*" packages to follow this naming scheme for F8.

4 10

why not %{_datadir} on fonts scripletsnippet
by Jens-Ulrik Petersen 23 Aug '07

23 Aug '07

Hi, http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#head-4863fc4c93ce… The "Fonts" scriptlets currently have: %{_bindir}/fc-cache /usr/share/fonts is there some subtle reason for not using %{_datadir} here? I'll for responses before changing it to: %{_bindir}/fc-cache %{_datadir}/fonts Jens -- Jens Petersen Internationalization Team Red Hat

4 8

Packaging guidelines for Emacsen add-on packages
by Jonathan Underwood 15 Aug '07

15 Aug '07

Dear Packaging Committee, I have placed a draft Guidelines document on the wiki for your consideration. This document covers the packaging of Emacs and XEmacs add-on packages, and provides two template spec files with the intention of lowering the inertial barrier to developing packages for (X)Emacs. The doc can be found here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/EmacsenAddOns And I have added it to the table here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/DraftsTodo This document doesn't attempt to change guidelines in any way, but rather clarify the situation as presented in the Package Naming Guidelines, and codify them in the form of spec templates. Comments gladly received! Best wishes, Jonathan

7 49

License Tag Draft
by Tom Callaway 12 Aug '07

12 Aug '07

OK, I know this is going to be painful, but we need to solve this (FESCo is waiting for us to do it), and I think this is the cleanest way: Please review: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/LicenseTag and http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing . We'll vote on it next week. Thanks, ~spot

18 70

Missing most meetings until mid-September
by Axel Thimm 31 Jul '07

31 Jul '07

Hi, I'm quite busy in August [no, not with a vacation ... :/], so I will have to skip most meetings. Please ping me when my vote is needed (although most voting are almost unanimous, so my vote will not be neccessary). I'll try to look into the meetings whenever possible. -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net

1 0

Users and groups -- the static alternative
by Toshio Kuratomi 29 Jul '07

29 Jul '07

The Packaging committee has been discussing users and groups for a long time, coming up with increasingly elaborate methods of solving the problems with dynamic allocation of uids. As an alternative we want to explore biting the bullet and just allocating another uid range for static assignment. We thought of two possible ways to do this that made some sense: 1) Allocate the uids at the high end of the 32 bit range: 2**32-(range) to avoid the uids being used on as many systems as possible. 2) Work with another distro to share the range of static uids. What do people think of this? Will it cause pain for too many sites? Is it an acceptable cost to avoid having to debate dynamic vs static uids for every package review in the future? -Toshio

7 10

Make empty debuginfo packages a build error?
by Ville Skyttä 28 Jul '07

28 Jul '07

Hi, How about making empty debuginfo packages a build error? I can't think of a reason why an empty one would be a desired result, but empty ones do almost always indicate problems with the build. Arch specific packages that expectedly don't have anything to place into the debuginfo package should explicitly disable it eg. with "%define debug_package %{nil}". Also submitted as https://bugzilla.redhat.com/249956

3 7

rpmlint check for proper %defattr?
by Jason L Tibbitts III 28 Jul '07

28 Jul '07

I'm seeing a lot of reviews lately with complaints about %defattr. I admit to not always checking it myself, but this seems to be the kind of thing that rpmlint could easily check for. I know that the complete lack of %defattr is problematic, but I'm not sure whether "%defattr(-,root,root)" is a blocker or not. The only place it seems to be mentioned is in %lang section of the guidelines (and in templates contained in the various language-specific guidelines). - J<

4 4

License Tag Draft: Revised
by Tom Callaway 27 Jul '07

27 Jul '07

Please go take a look at the revised License Tag Draft: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/LicenseTag http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing has also had some minor short name changes. Constructive criticism is welcomed. Conspiratorial rantings will neither be confirmed nor denied. Thanks, ~spot

3 2

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

packaging July 2007