[Reposted from devel, this is a more appropriate list]
febootstrap doesn't like:
febootstrap: error: /etc/mtab is a config file which is listed in two packages (setup-2.8.30-1.fc15.noarch.rpm, util-linux-2.19-0.2.fc15.x86_64.rpm)
Is it OK for a %config file to exist in two RPMs?
Wouldn't RPM always create an .rpmsave or .rpmnew file in these circumstances?
Rich.
Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
[Reposted from devel, this is a more appropriate list]
febootstrap doesn't like:
febootstrap: error: /etc/mtab is a config file which is listed in two packages (setup-2.8.30-1.fc15.noarch.rpm, util-linux-2.19-0.2.fc15.x86_64.rpm)
Is it OK for a %config file to exist in two RPMs?
Wouldn't RPM always create an .rpmsave or .rpmnew file in these circumstances?
Yes, ownership of /etc/mtab in setup is planned to be dropped in next rawhide setup build.
Ondrej Vasik
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 03:55:06PM +0100, Ondrej Vasik wrote:
Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
[Reposted from devel, this is a more appropriate list]
febootstrap doesn't like:
febootstrap: error: /etc/mtab is a config file which is listed in two packages (setup-2.8.30-1.fc15.noarch.rpm, util-linux-2.19-0.2.fc15.x86_64.rpm)
Is it OK for a %config file to exist in two RPMs?
Wouldn't RPM always create an .rpmsave or .rpmnew file in these circumstances?
Yes, ownership of /etc/mtab in setup is planned to be dropped in next rawhide setup build.
Great, I will be able to build libguestfs again ...
Thanks,
Rich.
packaging@lists.fedoraproject.org