====================== #fedora-meeting-1: fpc ======================
Meeting started by geppetto at 16:00:20 UTC. The full logs are available at http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2015-10-08/fpc.2015-10-08-... .
Meeting summary --------------- * Roll Call (geppetto, 16:00:20)
* Schedule (geppetto, 16:04:18) * LINK:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/packaging/2015-October/011043.html (geppetto, 16:04:23)
* Rant about bundling (geppetto, 16:04:39) * LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Tibbs/BundlingDraft2 as well as "deleting" the two standalone pages on bundling. (tibbs|w, 16:17:06) * ACTION: Bundling Guidelines Overhaul (+1:7, 0:0, -1:0) (geppetto, 16:23:49) * For what it's worth nobody in FPC seems to be of the opinion that this was a good change. (geppetto, 16:24:38)
* #567 Packaging Python 3 applications and modules for EPEL 7+ (geppetto, 16:25:02) * LINK: https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/567 (geppetto, 16:25:03)
* #558 Application/Library distinction and package splitting (geppetto, 16:41:31) * LINK: https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/558 (geppetto, 16:41:32)
* Open Floor (geppetto, 16:46:33)
Meeting ended at 16:50:41 UTC.
Action Items ------------ * Bundling Guidelines Overhaul (+1:7, 0:0, -1:0)
Action Items, by person ----------------------- * **UNASSIGNED** * Bundling Guidelines Overhaul (+1:7, 0:0, -1:0)
People Present (lines said) --------------------------- * geppetto (55) * tibbs|w (52) * tomspur (16) * zodbot (11) * orionp (9) * racor (6) * Rathann (6) * mbooth (4) * nirik (3) * tibbs (0)
Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4
.. _`MeetBot`: http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot
On Thu, Oct 08, 2015 at 12:52:07PM -0400, James Antill wrote:
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2015-10-08/fpc.2015-10-08-...
[...]
- Rant about bundling (geppetto, 16:04:39)
- LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Tibbs/BundlingDraft2 as well as "deleting" the two standalone pages on bundling. (tibbs|w, 16:17:06)
- ACTION: Bundling Guidelines Overhaul (+1:7, 0:0, -1:0) (geppetto, 16:23:49)
- For what it's worth nobody in FPC seems to be of the opinion that this was a good change. (geppetto, 16:24:38)
I want to emphasize
16:05:09 <nirik> note: I think fesco would be open to changes...
As I'm sure everyone knows but is worth repeating, Fedora is an ongoing process, and the new direction isn't set in stone. I know some of FPC would like it be reversed, but — see long, long thread! — I don't think that's the only possible positive approach and would really like to encourage proposals for refinement to address missing parts.
packaging@lists.fedoraproject.org