Le Mer 24 octobre 2007 13:53, Patrice Dumas a écrit :
On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 01:38:58PM +0200, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
If anyone on the fonts list object to part of this page or wants something clarified, please speak now
Maybe I am demanding too much, but I would hae liked to have explanation on what to do for all of the different fonts, bitmap fonts, truetype fonts and type1 fonts (latex fonts?). There is nothing about /etc/X11/fontpath.d/ for example.
Well nothing stops anyone from pushing a legacy font template through the Fonts SIG later (either by extending this one or by writing another). It's up to the packagers of these legacy fonts to agree in the SIG on a proposal. Right now no one wrote a legacy fonts template, so there's nothing to submit to FPC.
Regards,
Nicolas Mailhot さんは書きました:
Well nothing stops anyone from pushing a legacy font template through the Fonts SIG later (either by extending this one or by writing another). It's up to the packagers of these legacy fonts to agree in the SIG on a proposal. Right now no one wrote a legacy fonts template, so there's nothing to submit to FPC.
True. A few legacy fonts went into Fedora recently: baekmuk-fonts-bdf, taipei-fonts, wqy-unibit-fonts, and a couple of Japanese bitmaps too.
Some of them might be helpful starting points for a template.
Jens
packaging@lists.fedoraproject.org
-
Jens-Ulrik Petersen -
Nicolas Mailhot